Mafiascum.net

In post 2547, Stephen A Smith wrote:the rolecop claimed he investigated the gs backup? lol what

In post 2485, wavemode wrote:what if I told you that I'm a 1-shot rolecop and I know for a fact that hockeyfan is a backup 1-shot gunsmith

so my knee jerk reaction to nero's claim was, how did he know to claim gunsmith of all things? hockey had not told us what he was a backup for

unless they are mafia GS and mafia backup GS? which, wow wtf. but it's technically possible I suppose. still, it's strange to claim that together and become joined at the hip (the typical risk associated with mason fakeclaims)

^

hey DW, lets kill AD

NERO ahhh

In post 2551, Nero Cain wrote:hey DW, lets kill AD

andante can't die. nice try

whatever

VOTE: eyes

cant wait to see how modtisi fucks me over this game

I want Scorpious or eyes. If you can't do those for whatever reason I need more than "let's get Andante instead"

VOTE: eyes let's make it happen people

will u accept "wanted to eliminate the EN GS so mafia (presumably her team) can shoot the backup"

In post 2557, Nero Cain wrote:will u accept "wanted to eliminate the EN GS so mafia (presumably her team) can shoot the backup"

No

In post 2555, Dwlee99 wrote:I want Scorpious or eyes. If you can't do those for whatever reason I need more than "let's get Andante instead"

wooooo andante is town!!! glad you're seeing it!

In post 2557, Nero Cain wrote:will u accept "wanted to eliminate the EN GS so mafia (presumably her team) can shoot the backup"

yeah but... shooting you tonight already prevents you from sharing your results, no?

then shoot the backup tomorrow

Is there a particular reason to lim eyes over scorpious today?

Like okay I understand I've been pushing eyes longer but I felt like scorpious had more traction to begin with but now it's all going to Eyes? And I'm not quite sure why

In post 2476, Stephen A Smith wrote:

In post 2427, HockeyFan wrote:

In post 2419, Stephen A Smith wrote:which nero post do you find townie again?

I can not be fucked to sift through 25 pages of thier interactions. Anwyays, i decided that thier interaction was t/s, and i found FA scummier since she repeated the same talking abounts about 20 times

this explanation makes no sense

if you think Nero/FA is T/S and FA flips town that makes Nero Scum

yes, I did come to this conclusion, but I reconsidered it over N1


Are we really gonna go through 20+ pages just to come back to voting Eyes, fucking lol. Scorp is much scummier than eyes here imo

I also feel better about the likely hypothetical vigilante shooting the VT claim over an unclaimed person (scorpious)

In post 2548, Andante wrote:VOTE: eyes
if we can't yeet a pr, I'm down to yeet the one who voluntarily claimed VT d1

This logic doesn’t suck..

I’m at “fuck it “ levels right now..

People are giving roadmaps for fake claims and every single wagon fizzles because of whatever.

VOTE: Eyes

In post 2548, Andante wrote:VOTE: eyes
if we can't yeet a pr, I'm down to yeet the one who voluntarily claimed VT d1

SCUM

In post 2554, Stephen A Smith wrote:whatever

VOTE: eyes

cant wait to see how modtisi fucks me over this game

Probably Scum

In post 2556, wavemode wrote:VOTE: eyes let's make it happen people

Bad town

In post 2564, Scorpious wrote:

In post 2548, Andante wrote:VOTE: eyes
if we can't yeet a pr, I'm down to yeet the one who voluntarily claimed VT d1

This logic doesn’t suck..

I’m at “fuck it “ levels right now..

People are giving roadmaps for fake claims and every single wagon fizzles because of whatever.

VOTE: Eyes

Bad Town

ok maybe i should have just done this right away but i didn't want to. sue me. i don't think eyes is scum so i think it's worth doing now. scum might have overplayed their hand here

i CC gunsmith. im gunsmith straight up, no modifiers. i looked at nero n1 and got action failed, no result

unvote eyes and probably vote nero

In post 2566, fireisredsir wrote:ok maybe i should have just done this right away but i didn't want to. sue me. i don't think eyes is scum so i think it's worth doing now. scum might have overplayed their hand here

i CC gunsmith. im gunsmith straight up, no modifiers. i looked at nero n1 and got action failed, no result

unvote eyes and probably vote nero

Do you feel nero eyes scum team?

i do not think that Nero and hockey are scum together. i think maf team has a rolecop and checked out hockey to see what they could fakeclaim, and Nero claimed to try to draw out the gunsmith claim since he was going down

no not particularly? everyone piled on eyes just now and at least one of the people who did is scum

In post 2485, wavemode wrote:what if I told you that I'm a 1-shot rolecop and I know for a fact that hockeyfan is a backup 1-shot gunsmith

so my knee jerk reaction to nero's claim was, how did he know to claim gunsmith of all things? hockey had not told us what he was a backup for

unless they are mafia GS and mafia backup GS? which, wow wtf. but it's technically possible I suppose. still, it's strange to claim that together and become joined at the hip (the typical risk associated with mason fakeclaims)

I believe this 100% (or as close to 100% as I ever believe anything in this game) and think it pretty much clears both Hockey and Nero unless there is some further mechanical revelation to the contrary.

I just can't imagine a setup with town gunsmith and scum backup gunsmith, or vice versa, would pass review, because it's way too swingy (you kill an opposing power role and your own team gets even powerful as a result? That's, like, the opposite of how to keep a game balanced).

I imagine a setup with scum gunsmith and scum backup gunsmith, but I don't believe Hockey and Nero make this sort of absurd all-in in the case where they're both scum. If they did it should be obvious eventually.

never mind

VOTE: Nero

jfc, i'm gonna come back later re these claims, im too tired rn

In post 2568, fireisredsir wrote:i do not think that Nero and hockey are scum together. i think maf team has a rolecop and checked out hockey to see what they could fakeclaim, and Nero claimed to try to draw out the gunsmith claim since he was going down

ok this kind of makes sense to me