Posted: Thu Jun 07, 2012 10:48 am
Scum on which side?
Page 104 of 179
Posted: Thu Jun 07, 2012 10:51 am
I'd assume the right since they aren't going on his wagon
Posted: Thu Jun 07, 2012 11:06 am
No, I'm saying it's scummy to park your vote on somebody with very little chance of being lynched, when there are other more viable wagons.
If they are actively engaging in discussion, it's one thing. But they aren't. So it's THE OTHER THING (they're scum). I will go straight down this list and lynch every single one of these fuckers. I give no fucks.
Posted: Thu Jun 07, 2012 11:19 am
Kondi, while DW is not the brightest of players, he's not a moron, either. Do you know what non-morons do when they are asked to claim upon replacing in? They ISO their predecessor.
Posted: Thu Jun 07, 2012 11:30 am
votecount
Spyrex (7): amrun, mattp, Jackal711, uberninja, syndromeofadown, TechnoWC, kondi2424
bbmolla (4): PeregrineV, staeg, callforjudgement, thetrollie
technowc (3): Ellibereth, Trevor, zdenek
sykedoc (1): theamatuer
amrun (1): hoopla
Kondi2424 (1): Redff
thetrollie (1): petapan
peregrinev (1): BBmolla
zoraster (1) zajnet
Posted: Thu Jun 07, 2012 11:33 am
Meh. I remember seeing it work somewhere before.
Posted: Thu Jun 07, 2012 11:37 am
You really think I'm going to replace into a game and claim in my very next post after reading literally nothing other than my role PM and the text on that page?
Anyway, Kiyaruu's claim is correct in every respect. I will also decline to say how many times this ability can be used.
ALSO HI UBERNINJA
Anyway, Kiyaruu's claim is correct in every respect. I will also decline to say how many times this ability can be used.
ALSO HI UBERNINJA
Posted: Thu Jun 07, 2012 12:32 pm
Uber, let's start with Hoopla, since SpyreX says she's scum and he's a POWERFUL WIZARD and all that.
Vote: Hoopla
Posted: Thu Jun 07, 2012 12:34 pm
Let's lynch NS after this.
Posted: Thu Jun 07, 2012 12:46 pm
Why?
Posted: Thu Jun 07, 2012 1:05 pm
V/LA again until Monday.
Posted: Thu Jun 07, 2012 1:21 pm
Posted: Thu Jun 07, 2012 1:30 pm
Depends on how Spyrex flips. Also, he's not EXACTLY buddying; he called him a town read and is voting based on Uber's reasoning.
I agree with Uber's reasoning on the inactive voters. Uber is looking very, very town at this stage. Looks like I might have been wrong about him as I was Luffy
Posted: Thu Jun 07, 2012 2:06 pm
I'm not sure whether to throw a book at NS for trying to start a Hoopla wagon BEFORE SpyreX is dead, or for trying to get me to join him.
Either way... *bookthrow*
Either way... *bookthrow*
Posted: Thu Jun 07, 2012 2:21 pm
Posted: Thu Jun 07, 2012 4:25 pm
^ *Laughs*
Moar spyrex votes!
Moar spyrex votes!
Posted: Thu Jun 07, 2012 4:31 pm
↑ callforjudgement wrote:People who are voting but not on the main wagons, do you think both main wagons are bad? Or do you have other reasons for your votes?
Haven't really kept up with the game. Amrun started the last wagon that ended with scum death, so I'll sheep that I guess.
VOTE: Spyrex
Although looking at the latest post, Nobody Special doesn't seem like a bad idea either.
Posted: Thu Jun 07, 2012 4:35 pm
I've also seen it horribly backfire.
Like when it was done to me when I replaced into Reck's Batman game, and I almost got lynched for it because my predecessor claimed strangely. Y'know, where I was the Town Vig that fired the game winning shot a night or two later.
Anyways, I don't like either of the current bigger wagons, but I also don't really want to lynch zoraster anymore now that I think about it better.
UNVOTE: zoraster
VOTE: NS
@UN: Why do you consider it scummier to park your vote on someone who isn't likely to get lynched as opposed to not voting at all?
Posted: Thu Jun 07, 2012 4:37 pm
↑ Zajnet wrote:
I've also seen it horribly backfire.
Like when it was done to me when I replaced into Reck's Batman game, and I almost got lynched for it because my predecessor claimed strangely. Y'know, where I was the Town Vig that fired the game winning shot a night or two later.
Anyways, I don't like either of the current bigger wagons, but I also don't really want to lynch zoraster anymore now that I think about it better.
UNVOTE: zoraster
VOTE: NS
Why don't you want to lynch Zoraster? His current activity for me has taken him from nulltell lurker to likely scum lurker.Do you think he is town?
@UN: Why do you consider it scummier to park your vote on someone who isn't likely to get lynched as opposed to not voting at all?
Posted: Thu Jun 07, 2012 4:39 pm
What the heck, I wrote shit.
@Zoraster: Do you think zoraster is town now and why so? His recent activity, for me anyway, has taken him from nulltell lurker to likely scum lurker.
@Zoraster: Do you think zoraster is town now and why so? His recent activity, for me anyway, has taken him from nulltell lurker to likely scum lurker.
Posted: Thu Jun 07, 2012 4:39 pm
@Zajnet*
FUCK! Bloody posts
FUCK! Bloody posts
Posted: Thu Jun 07, 2012 4:48 pm
↑ callforjudgement wrote:zoraster's town. In both AFFC and WIH3, he was busy complaining that players weren't playing the setup "properly", i.e. fitting in with the theme rather than with the optimal town strategy; that's not happening here, even though arguably we aren't (I'd expect zoraster to want to push a bunch of crazy policy lynches in a 50-player game).
So I think he's being reasonably unselfish here. From zoraster, that's a towntell.
This post is what changed my mind on zoraster.
Posted: Thu Jun 07, 2012 5:39 pm
Because people not voting at all are more likely to get called out than the ones who say "herp derp i'm just voting who I want lynched, don't judge me" and that's a much better place to hide as scum.
Sheep me lest I slay thee.
Posted: Thu Jun 07, 2012 5:41 pm
