He complained that I had expressed that he wasn't helping a lynch situation and derided me for thinking as such.In post 2571, Titus wrote:@Thor then what did you think Anti said? I don't think his point is idiotic.
I said I had declared no such thing and asked for supporting evidence.
He provided a bold comment of a generic address that we should get a lynch, made after a paragraph with very specific call outs that had no points addressed at him.
I don't see me doing what he said I did.
I don't see him calling anything I did hypocritical.
Clarify?
Okay, first off - seriously now. Would you ever expect to be able to *fakeclaim IC*?In post 2571, Titus wrote:IC fakeclaim + lack of cirrection + lack of defense + OMGUS reads + deadline + refusal to correct at latest opportunity.
Like...how would that even work?
Who would even buy it?
Lack of direction...hardly a unique state in this game.
Lack of defense...I don't even understand the case on him, if I was him my defense would be 'where's the fire?' but I don't see this as a scumtell. Most scum are happy to defend themselves.
I don't think he's done OMGUS.
Correct what? The mason claim with himself or the IC fakeclaim?
The scummiest thing he did was not just give a straight claim answer.
But to even mention the IC thing like it was scummy is terrible. You might as well have called him scum for faking mason with himself. It was never a credible claim and would never have done anything to push a lynch off him. It is a big pile of null.