Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2019 1:38 pm
gimme fruit this time
gimme fruit this time
What do you think of him continually defending me? is that scum wisdom?In post 2540, Ausuka wrote:wisdom and i think i've explained it - to be clear i think he's intentionally refusing to engage or give any substance so he can just get by. i wouldn't expect town!wisdom to create walls or anything but i'd expect him to throw out a sentence or two occasionally and making pointless points that don't say anything. i feel stronger about them now because i didn't really know what to make of him before recently and now i think he's scum.In post 2362, Party Boat wrote:so one is vaxIn post 2361, Ausuka wrote:I meant that I have stronger reads, as in two scumreads I believe in rather than just one and I feel more strongly about both. that was unclear sorry. I would argue that my Vax read is now better because I now have more evidence for it but that's an opinion.In post 2359, Party Boat wrote:?Ausuka wrote: i have better reads now though? and since i'm a wagon i have to at least try and produce content to make people tr me, that goes for either alignment. And like am I not supposed to talk about my scumreads because that's news to me?
so like
what "better" reads do you have now exactly
is the other Saud or Gemerald or Xtomx or someone else b/c I can't really tell from your iso
and what makes you feel stronger about them now?
In post 2578, Vaxkiller wrote:Danifloor: Ugh, hes like taking everyone popular opinions, and playing off past emotions. this looks bad.
No offense but your posts are far from the clearest, most easy to understand, so that is more a reflection of your confusing writing style than any “reading comprehension” issue on my end. That said, that is a good point that anyone who pushes me here or anyone widely obvtown read is more likely scum than not. It gets confusing like in the case of Dannflor who seems really townie - unlike his predecessors. I could argue that really smart scum only sr the more mislynchable players and pocket obvtown.In post 2533, mastina wrote:Nancy I appreciate you but your reading comprehension continues to be absolute shit.In post 2521, Nancy Drew 39 wrote:,
You are one of my strongest townreads. I wasn't asking how obvtown I should treat you; I was asking how obvtown OTHERS have treated you, which should be stupidly self evident as to why I it makes a difference.
A player targeting someone who they know will live due to not being a likely night kill is more likely town; a player targeting someone who's obvtown enough where their target could eat the nightkill is likely scum, who knew that their target would live, making it a pocketing attempt. Thus my stupidly self-obvious question; the answer makes a difference in his alignment. Since it sounds like you are indeed that obvtown to others, it makes Purrcocet more likely scum.
How tf am I being even remotely hypocritical here? Sheep was your partner in that game and you voice no opinion on his play here wrt to that game. You were also unclear in your post re: the “obvtown” thing.In post 2534, mastina wrote:Also stop being hypocritical. You ranted about people who didn't sheep your strong read that game (the worst as town), but now are complaining about the fact that I AM sheeping the read.
You've been in the game, I haven't. You've seen all his posts, I've seen only the ones since I replaced in: too few to accurately pin him down. Why WOULDN'T I sheep you on sheep? You'd be the expert there.
https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.p ... B%5D=30560In post 2535, Dannflor wrote:I had a lot of free time yesterday and a good memory. I did mark down the roles of the dead players and the neighborhood (because I wanted to keep track of who those players were as I read through) straight away. The rest of the claims I just made a mental note of as I went. I didn't see the fruit vendor until I started ISOing people, so I might have missed other small things like that?In post 2508, Wagonomics wrote:That's really interesting. I guess partly I thought it was interesting the way you constructed the list (where you seemed to be consciously thinking about claims, which might have been easy to miss or forget on a quick skim). I also thought it was a bit interesting that you seemed to grapple onto specific posts.
Effort does not equal alignment, of course, I would completely agree with you there. However, that doesn't change the fact that I think many players are likely to (even subconsciously) associate that effort with town. If you are town, I would have expected that energy when you entered the game to be used literally elsewhere, instead of something that's basically fluff.In post 2507, mastina wrote:What.
The words you say are in a vacuum my own beliefs but in context are divorced from reality.
Effort != alignment. I am the strongest proponent of this on site. Literally THE strongest proponent, I know this better than anyone else, I fucking invented the expression for god's sake.
The reason your attitude right now gives me bad vibes is because it's eerily similar to Sheep's "heh heh idk what to rlly think about leodanny guys" before voting him, for which I scum read him heavily. The fact that you actually scum read my slot makes me feel better about this than say the Sheep situation, but the way you are framing it as a "third axis read" where you're just going along with other player's reads makes it really easy to have plausible deniability, and that feels icky to me.
Hm, interesting. Do you have a link to that game?In post 2520, Nancy Drew 39 wrote:I just finished a game with scum!sheep and he acted completely different than here but I otherwise like this. post so . . .
This is the one I'm using as my frame of reference: https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=78097
is this sarcasmIn post 2531, Purrcocet wrote:- Its ok to fence sit as long as you do it across 5 posts and 2456 words
In post 2581, Nancy Drew 39 wrote:
Not sure where Purrcocet fits into this wrt to me. She has had me as locktown from the getgo - something she also did in BoR - where she was town. I have yet to be in a game with Purr where she doesn’t hardtown read me. She obviously does or else she wouldn’t have given me fruit N1.
I don’t understand. How are Purr and Dann remotely linked? I think Purr’s handlng of the whole fruit thing, seels townie to me. Had she jumped on me for the way I dealt with it, would have majorly pinged me but she was totally chill about it.In post 2537, mastina wrote:So Kokichi should be a tier below the top, but NOT the middle tier, in a new second tier. I'm not sure if anyone joins him there or not; candidates are Enter, sheep, and Wagonomics. If any of them aren't joining Kokichi in the new second tier, they instead form a third tier, leaving a mostly unchanged former middle tier as fourth tier/second from bottom tier. This pile contains the secret scumread.In post 2314, mastina wrote:Wisdom
Nancy Drew 39
vonflare
Party Boat
Flavor Leaf
Kokichi Oma
Enter
sheepsaysmeep
Wagonomics
Vaxkiller
Ausuka
light_ganski
Jingle
Purrcocet
Trekkie99
Gamma Emerald
TheBrie
singletonking
Saudade
Xtoxm
Okay so the names from pretty much Party Boat to light are highly flexible and in the bottom six the names there are largely interchangeable meaning this list is a rough of roughest drafts for a readslist but hey, it's here.
Purrcocet and Dannflor are an either/or now. I don't think that they're both scum, but I DO think one IS scum.
Xtoxm and singleton are strong enough scumreads to almost warrant their own tier. Plus the scum in Dann/Purr. The remaining 3, Gamma/Brie/Trekkie, are interchangeable.
I'd give the list properly if not phoneposting and pressed for time.
Yeah, you weren’t open wolfing in that game, like you were in BoS. How I got mislynched over you, still blows my mind.In post 2538, sheepsaysmeep wrote:this feels a lot like town!dann already even from the first post alone (i did a meta dive on him in the trekkie game leaned earlier ps trekkie is still villa)
and i'd honestly expect him to have that type of w read on me with the meta information he has
There are NO DEADLINES, I don’t sr Ausuka and Dann seemed really townie. Why shouldn’t we have unvoted him?In post 2539, Jingle wrote:I am extremely annoyed that you all have taken someone out of hammer range and demand that a new wagon that I can hammer be arranged in the next 48 hours.
No deadlines doesn't mean no thread apathy.In post 2590, Nancy Drew 39 wrote:There are NO DEADLINES, I don’t sr Ausuka and Dann seemed really townie. Why shouldn’t we have unvoted him?In post 2539, Jingle wrote:I am extremely annoyed that you all have taken someone out of hammer range and demand that a new wagon that I can hammer be arranged in the next 48 hours.
Would you have been less annoyed had no one unvoted and he flipped town?
If this was a deadline game, your annoyance would make a helluva lot more sense. We aren’t risking a no lynch here.
0.In post 2593, Wagonomics wrote:Jingle, what do you think the likelihood is that there is a scum triple voter in this setup?
No, not really. I was hard scumreading that slot before the Dann replace in, so that’s totally NAI.In post 2551, Xtoxm wrote:ausuka being willing to vote saudade to save herself but is happy to die for mastina says a lot tbh
Which reads townie to me?In post 2555, Xtoxm wrote:and now that the absent slot got a replacement and the wagon is dead shes your cw
and youre throwing yourself in front of her
I disagree that it’s a meh wagon. The case is meh, but that’s been admittedly.In post 2592, Jingle wrote:mastina wagon is meh. She hasn't done things of either alignment yet and she's been active. Down with taking a passive stance there.
Dannflor slot continues to be a murder target. Reads unchanged from ~20 pages ago. Someone make this game more interesting and I'll pretend I care more.