Mafiascum.net

In post 2574, Nimueh wrote:Based on meta, I’m pretty sure this is town!Creature we’re seeing here.

In post 2554, Ankamius wrote:Sort creature based on how he proceeds from here, tbh I can buy town being unenthused about catching up this game, but he reached out to me for help with that and I think the way he uses that information will be more indicative to his alignment than how he entered the game

In post 2575, Flubbernugget wrote:

In post 2574, Nimueh wrote:Based on meta, I’m pretty sure this is town!Creature we’re seeing here.

internal screaming

In post 2577, Ankamius wrote:I'm glad you believe that Nim

I don't like meta reading creature so I don't

In post 2574, Nimueh wrote:I’m a bit confused here as I don’t see Ank and myself as a 1v1 and also, Skitter didn’t sheep Ank onto me. Ank never voted me. I think Ank is town and reading me incorrectly. Sure there’s a very small part of me that thinks there’s a slight possibility of her being S v S with Skitter but unlikely. I would love it if Ank were scum misreading me here, rather than believe she could ever be this off on me, I just really don’t think so.

Re: Xtoxm. I have to say that his comment on Brigitte hammering NMSA, is at least part of why I initially voted him, so I was very shocked that he instead voted Flubber.

Based on meta, I’m pretty sure this is town!Creature we’re seeing here.

Agree on Chara and Tris.

In post 2558, Ankamius wrote:

In post 2555, Flubbernugget wrote:

In post 2537, Ankamius wrote:I've been paying attention to skitter's trajectory on reading you and nothing she's done so far was weird relative to that. This omgusing on her is silly.

Flubber's last two posts are scummy.

Well luckily the trajectory isn't the issue. It's actually a lot simpler than that.

I'm not the only one that thought that skitter's vote on me was weird. Why is only my concern scummy? How is it omgus when I called out a second vote outside of her scum reads., which exactly what struck everyone as odd the first time?

Okay that explains it, I thought you were talking about the Nimueh read.

That reads null then

In post 2532, Flubbernugget wrote:Skitter's new vote is even more bizarre than their previous one

In post 2581, tris wrote:So, I know who Nimueh is because I have read the game skitter was in with her. So, I understand Nimueh's point that skitter shouldn't scumread her for "overreacting". Because I know who she is, I was able to find the game Ankamius referred to where she last scumread her. I wish we were able to talk more directly about it, because I don't see what the scumtell Ankamius is referring to here is. But, it's hard to discuss this to try to understand.

In post 2582, Ankamius wrote:that's because the scumtell I'm referring to specifically this game is related to how I've read her in past games, but the exact implementation is different in a way that I've never stated publicly before

In post 2580, xRECKONERx wrote:

In post 2574, Nimueh wrote:I’m a bit confused here as I don’t see Ank and myself as a 1v1 and also, Skitter didn’t sheep Ank onto me. Ank never voted me. I think Ank is town and reading me incorrectly. Sure there’s a very small part of me that thinks there’s a slight possibility of her being S v S with Skitter but unlikely. I would love it if Ank were scum misreading me here, rather than believe she could ever be this off on me, I just really don’t think so.

Re: Xtoxm. I have to say that his comment on Brigitte hammering NMSA, is at least part of why I initially voted him, so I was very shocked that he instead voted Flubber.

Based on meta, I’m pretty sure this is town!Creature we’re seeing here.

Agree on Chara and Tris.

i didnt say you were a 1v1, i just said yalls interactions were pinging me as opposite alignments, basically

idgaf about meta. meta is trash

In post 2583, tris wrote:

In post 2558, Ankamius wrote:

In post 2555, Flubbernugget wrote:

In post 2537, Ankamius wrote:I've been paying attention to skitter's trajectory on reading you and nothing she's done so far was weird relative to that. This omgusing on her is silly.

Flubber's last two posts are scummy.

Well luckily the trajectory isn't the issue. It's actually a lot simpler than that.

I'm not the only one that thought that skitter's vote on me was weird. Why is only my concern scummy? How is it omgus when I called out a second vote outside of her scum reads., which exactly what struck everyone as odd the first time?

Okay that explains it, I thought you were talking about the Nimueh read.

That reads null then

Isn't this referring to skitter's "new" vote?

In post 2532, Flubbernugget wrote:Skitter's new vote is even more bizarre than their previous one

In post 300, northsidegal wrote:

It was hard to notice given that the sun was still directly overhead, but many of the lights weren't working as well.

Votecount 1.4

NotMySpamAccount (5):

u r a person 2 5, tris 62, tictac 67, Brigitte 144, Enter 207

skitter30 (2):

Chara 69, Bronson 259

Brigitte (1):

NotMySpamAccount 198

Enter (1):

xRECKONERx 82

Not voting (4):

Nimueh, Ankamius, skitter30 190, Flubbernugget 258

With 13 alive, it’s 7 to lynch. The Day 1 deadline is in (expired on 2019-03-08 00:58:59).

In post 886, skitter30 wrote:oh that reminds me: is forgetting that the game is nightless ai at all?

In post 2582, Ankamius wrote:that's because the scumtell I'm referring to specifically this game is related to how I've read her in past games, but the exact implementation is different in a way that I've never stated publicly before

In post 2542, Ankamius wrote:It's very unlikely I'll push for a lynch on you today precisely because it doesn't further towns wincon regardless of your flip. It's too early for that

In post 2594, Ankamius wrote:well ok

they're completely separate thoughts that don't actually go together but sure