Mafiascum.net

In post 2574, Ircher wrote:We could kill ratman instead you know. If we don't want to kill Gamma that is.

galron looks worse lol

In post 2500, Galron wrote:Why are you voting me Grandpa?

like this is such a weird post to come back and return to ?

they come say this and never talk ever again.

like the question itself is a not even a good question -- like?

im obviously voting you for a specific reason??

No, Flavor Leaf
Also idgaf about shellyc, and I don’t associate with any site made as a MS competitor by someone who got banned from MS,

In post 2577, Gamma Emerald wrote:No, Flavor Leaf
Also idgaf about shellyc, and I don’t associate with any site made as a MS competitor by someone who got banned from MS,

sorry not sorry

LOL

okay okay

actually i'm going to edit and take away the link to the shellyc site since i think it's actually against the rules to link to it and i'll link this picture of one of the games instead

ok nvm this is being awful here

that's mafia.gg.... that's not the [redacted]'s site ...

hey hi hello ive been given extra time because i think rc likes me uwu
sorry i've been distracted and newly sick and intimidated because i forgor how big large theme games are
with my newfound free time i'll commit to actually reading the full thread and giving my reads and voting and stuff
tomorrow
its 2:40 in the morning
i hope y'all havent missed me too much

In post 2529, ratmans wrote:

In post 2389, GrandpaMo wrote:I feel like I am repeating everything I have said -- I already this like two times. You may just have not understood it, which would make sense.

It could honestly be "roll a die in this PT and reference this chart of post restrictions".

This is the most promising guess anyone has made so far.
The fact remains that Victorine is clearly capable at least occasionally of making posts that aren't restricted.
So why won't they play the game.

In post 2576, GrandpaMo wrote:

In post 2500, Galron wrote:Why are you voting me Grandpa?

like this is such a weird post to come back and return to ?

they come say this and never talk ever again.

like the question itself is a not even a good question -- like?

im obviously voting you for a specific reason??

Agreed
Mo articulated their reasons multiple times

In post 2574, Ircher wrote:We could kill ratman instead you know. If we don't want to kill Gamma that is.

Or you could talk about your reads on dats and pooky.
Bonus points for thoughts on Taly, jjh, Titus.
~C

In post 2577, Gamma Emerald wrote:No, Flavor Leaf
Also idgaf about shellyc, and I don’t associate with any site made as a MS competitor by someone who got banned from MS,

sorry not sorry

LOL

In post 2505, Victorine wrote:The fact I usually shitpost as town prior to D2/D3 still gets ignored.

There is no post restriction.

In post 2579, RadiantCowbells wrote:actually i'm going to edit and take away the link to the shellyc site since i think it's actually against the rules to link to it and i'll link this picture of one of the games instead

ok nvm this is being awful here

Don’t click this, it will give you nightmares.

I don't think this progression is as bad as some have said.
In fact I don't see anything wrong with it at all.

Galron is like nullscum for me for a few gut/tonal things but I wouldn't prioritise a wagon there
Am happy to wait and see how their reads progress for now

Dat I saw your post and I do disagree with your view that I should be engaging your slot more
I can only engage so many slots and obviously I will come back to yours eventually when I sort some of my nulls
I haven't voted you and I don't think you should have a problem unless I'm using my preliminary impressions to justify a late vote on you
If I still vote you later I promise to you it will be based on more

But this has been argued ad nauseam
And as you said I don't think we'll make progress by going on for 10 more pages
So yeah let's move on in life

CW, the only reason you've presented for voting Ircher is a behavioural tell that you don't want to out, right?
How confident are you about the read?
If you won't out it I can't really sheep it unless you claim to be super super confident so I can hold you accountable on a greenflip.

In post 2477, Ircher wrote:Gamma, your statement that your voting history is fine is objectively wrong by the fact that many of your votes have in fact been called out. And no, your Queen vote was not townie and accomplished nothing other than looking busy.

Oh right there was this
Yeah it's pretty bad
Hmmm

"objectively wrong" is such misplaced certainty that it looks agenda-driven regardless of whether the agenda is to bus or to mislim

Ircher seems like a player who values rationality, I don't see how he just makes a blatant appeal to popularity about Gamma's voting instead of engaging it with either his own reasoning or asking Gamma to present own.

In post 2587, Deimos27 wrote:

Spoiler:

In post 2045, Galron wrote:I am not going to read 80 pages after coming in late. Likely will just vote the biggest wagon.

In post 2046, Galron wrote:Anyone else who came in late, would like to hear your thoughts.

Looking at the activity overview, read Clemency's ISO, there's less there than from anyone who started on time.

What's up Clemency?

I don't think this progression is as bad as some have said.
In fact I don't see anything wrong with it at all.

i can explain to u it if u really want me to again in simpler terms since im the one who brought it up fr

In post 2567, GrandpaMo wrote:also where did this ircher push come from?

can anyone explain to me

In post 2590, Deimos27 wrote:CW, the only reason you've presented for voting Ircher is a behavioural tell that you don't want to out, right?
How confident are you about the read?
If you won't out it I can't really sheep it unless you claim to be super super confident so I can hold you accountable on a greenflip.

is the explaantion

In post 2594, GrandpaMo wrote:

In post 2587, Deimos27 wrote:

Spoiler:

In post 2045, Galron wrote:I am not going to read 80 pages after coming in late. Likely will just vote the biggest wagon.

In post 2046, Galron wrote:Anyone else who came in late, would like to hear your thoughts.

Looking at the activity overview, read Clemency's ISO, there's less there than from anyone who started on time.

What's up Clemency?

I don't think this progression is as bad as some have said.
In fact I don't see anything wrong with it at all.

i can explain to u it if u really want me to again in simpler terms since im the one who brought it up fr

Yes please

Currently am considering if I actually want to vote Ircher

we might be losing queen pretty soon

sad.

In post 2574, Ircher wrote:We could kill ratman instead you know. If we don't want to kill Gamma that is.

Ircher talk to me about the ratman read at some point