Mafiascum.net

In post 2598, beeboy wrote:Also has my predecessor mentioned I am a miller?

In post 2595, beeboy wrote:

In post 2591, Almost50 wrote:First and foremost I have reason to believe Varsoon's absence was very much justified by RL events. I know for a fact he hasn't been available all over the site and I know why too (don't ask).

Varsoon strikes me as a player who is relying on both guts and emotions, which does explain his Dunn vote (no offense, but you ARE annoying to some, Dunn).

At this point I don't care whether Varsoon is a mason or not. The very fact that he called Titus' trick out and was very persistent makes him town in my eyes. There is absolutely no scum motivation in going out of your way to call someone on a fake claim like that. I only wish he could get over his overwhelming obsession with Dunn/Titus and start scum hunting elsewhere.

Just so you know when I faked claimed Masons the main people calling my claim fake where scum players. So your entire town case for Varsoon is incredibly meh in my eyes.

In post 2598, beeboy wrote:Also has my predecessor mentioned I am a miller?

In post 2602, Mirhawk wrote:Can someone tell me why AGar is scum?

In post 2592, Almost50 wrote:ISOing Performer (88 posts):

Since I'm only explaining my reads here I need not go through anything beyond his opening post.

"Vote No Lynch" is enough for me to get a town read on him.

Contrary to popular belief, only TOWN would suggest a No Lynch so openly and that early. Scum know this move will put them at the very center of everyone's suspects list. Personally, I wouldn't dare suggest it if I was scum (and I wouldn't dare fake claim on D1 either). I know YMMD and all, but that's how I classify Performer until further notice. Nothing in his ISO makes me think otherwise either.

Mirhawk (88 posts):

By implication, his early duel with Sick over Performer's NL suggestion makes him a slight town lean. However, most of his posts are one liners and uninformative.

I did like him asking about LAMIST, bc I didn't know what that was, but assumed it was a misspelled derivation of "lame"

I also like his stance on the mason claims.

Conclusion: Upon reread I'm relegating him from Town to Town-Lean.

There's nothing scummy in his ISO, but there's nothing strongly indicative of him being town either.

N.B. Shannon is now conf!town to me. The role claim was uncalled for, but it was also out of the blue (i.e. there was not much pressure on her).

I wouldn't be lynching here bc -although uninformed- that's a vote that can help us.

Scum are informed and will know where to vote

9and it certainly isn't in town's favour),

while town -no matter how uninformed- are more likely to hit on scum sooner or later

, besides.. if scum want to shoot her she's doing exactly what a VT should be doing, i.e. eating a bullet for the town PRs.

Everyone else has posted over 100 posts, and I'm not about to ISO them anytime soon.

I'll wait and see how the day (and night) go before I start doing that.

Also, welcome beeboy.

In post 2608, Mirhawk wrote:I don't see the vote switch as scummy, but the who he picked is kinda weird seeing as how he decided to blatantly sheep some other people (including Titus) instead of one of his secondary reads. Given how pissed off at the rest of the town he sounds I wouldn't have expected that.

I find everything before what you quoted pretty genuine.

In post 2593, Mirhawk wrote:

In post 2588, Titus wrote:@Shannon, When you keep voting town for being anti-town rather than finding scum, you give scum an excuse to do that too, creating a self fulfilling prophecy.

Right now, there's two decent cases. One, Agar's move was terribly scummy and logically inconsistent. Second, Mirhawk "slipped" that masons should have daytalk, likely because he did. Even if you feel overwhelmed to where you cannot give reads, you can at least look those over.

This mason thing is a huge deal because you let it be.

I don't know if I've ever seen masons without daytalk.

also you're making a mess of what I did. I saw a comment from you that made me think you had daytalk after the mason claim which reinforced the claim in my eyes. How is this a slip?

In post 2598, beeboy wrote:Also has my predecessor mentioned I am a miller?

In post 2598, beeboy wrote:Also has my predecessor mentioned I am a miller?

In post 2576, Mirhawk wrote:I admittedly might be mistaken about your read on Lapsa.

Is there something specific that makes you think I'm scum with him or do you just think we're both scum? To my knowledge I've barely acknowledged him this game.

In post 2619, AGar wrote: Dunn is probtown, with Zack and Wake. (Hey guys, note that all 3 of these players are also saying they won't lynch Titus, and are pretty universally being town-read. When three players won't lynch someone that are being fairly townread across the board... see above. Then think about how fucking stupid the idea that "AGAR UNVOTED TITUS HERP DA DERP" is. And then go fuck yourselves.)

In post 2606, Boem_u_dusi wrote:

In post 2592, Almost50 wrote:ISOing Performer (88 posts):

Since I'm only explaining my reads here I need not go through anything beyond his opening post.

"Vote No Lynch" is enough for me to get a town read on him.

Contrary to popular belief, only TOWN would suggest a No Lynch so openly and that early. Scum know this move will put them at the very center of everyone's suspects list. Personally, I wouldn't dare suggest it if I was scum (and I wouldn't dare fake claim on D1 either). I know YMMD and all, but that's how I classify Performer until further notice. Nothing in his ISO makes me think otherwise either.

Mirhawk (88 posts):

By implication, his early duel with Sick over Performer's NL suggestion makes him a slight town lean. However, most of his posts are one liners and uninformative.

I did like him asking about LAMIST, bc I didn't know what that was, but assumed it was a misspelled derivation of "lame"

I also like his stance on the mason claims.

Conclusion: Upon reread I'm relegating him from Town to Town-Lean.

There's nothing scummy in his ISO, but there's nothing strongly indicative of him being town either.

N.B. Shannon is now conf!town to me. The role claim was uncalled for, but it was also out of the blue (i.e. there was not much pressure on her).

I wouldn't be lynching here bc -although uninformed- that's a vote that can help us.

Scum are informed and will know where to vote

9and it certainly isn't in town's favour),

while town -no matter how uninformed- are more likely to hit on scum sooner or later

, besides.. if scum want to shoot her she's doing exactly what a VT should be doing, i.e. eating a bullet for the town PRs.

Everyone else has posted over 100 posts, and I'm not about to ISO them anytime soon.

I'll wait and see how the day (and night) go before I start doing that.

Also, welcome beeboy.

Huh? What the fuck did I just read? This is among 5 worst posts in the game.

In post 2622, Zachstralkita wrote:I'd like to know the other 4.

In post 1340, Zachstralkita wrote:

In post 1337, Varsoon wrote:Well, no one, but that's because we haven't counter-claimed masons yet.

I think we can't sidestep this any further, mason buddy.