Posted: Tue Nov 17, 2020 2:42 pm
BUT ARROWS ARE SHINY.
BIRD BRAIN CABD GET SHINY
BIRD BRAIN CABD GET SHINY
Given the emphasis on being VP I’d assume his posts would be distinctIn post 2595, midwaybear wrote:Maybe prism is posting, but I can't tell them apart.
amended for protown reasonsIn post 2575, Gamma Emerald wrote:Imo drivers should justtarget BM tonighttry to do what they think is best and if their target is a blade then yippee!
But I'm the bird.
You still have the most posts.In post 2599, Battle Mage wrote:we're on course for a 1000 page Day 1, keep it up guys...
Um NOIn post 2603, Battle Mage wrote:amended for protown reasonsIn post 2575, Gamma Emerald wrote:Imo drivers should justtarget BM tonighttry to do what they think is best and if their target is a blade then yippee!
You may be the bird. But I am the birb. And not the weirdly terfy kind.
This is actually anti-town because we want to maximize driver/blade pairs.In post 2603, Battle Mage wrote:amended for protown reasons
he just started a new job and is acclimating. this was anticipated when we agreed to do this. i've conveyed his opinions when he hasn't been able to post himself.In post 2582, midwaybear wrote:Why isn't Prism posting in the main thread?
sweet AFIn post 2605, Gamma Emerald wrote:You still have the most posts.In post 2599, Battle Mage wrote:we're on course for a 1000 page Day 1, keep it up guys...
noIn post 2602, midwaybear wrote:Have you been able to tell peta and Prism's posting apart?
maybe - although if we did, surely people should have claimed and we should have co-ordinated it?In post 2609, midwaybear wrote:This is actually anti-town because we want to maximize driver/blade pairs.In post 2603, Battle Mage wrote:amended for protown reasons
Correction, we want to maximize blade/driver pairs without anyone knowing who paired with who until after it occurred.In post 2609, midwaybear wrote:This is actually anti-town because we want to maximize driver/blade pairs.In post 2603, Battle Mage wrote:amended for protown reasons
What do you not approve of?In post 2606, unwnd wrote:If that is lead to be true, then I would rather push Brian/Flavor because they have said a few things I don't approve of.
what do you mean by the bit in italics?In post 2607, Gamma Emerald wrote:Um NOIn post 2603, Battle Mage wrote:amended for protown reasonsIn post 2575, Gamma Emerald wrote:Imo drivers should justtarget BM tonighttry to do what they think is best and if their target is a blade then yippee!
Blades can only have one partner at a time
Or at least in the actual game that’s the case
understandableIn post 2610, REAGAN BUSH 84 wrote:he just started a new job and is acclimating. this was anticipated when we agreed to do this. i've conveyed his opinions when he hasn't been able to post himself.In post 2582, midwaybear wrote:Why isn't Prism posting in the main thread?
Do you not realize how much of a hypocrite you were with that post? And now you’re reveling in being part of the problem.In post 2611, Battle Mage wrote:sweet AFIn post 2605, Gamma Emerald wrote:You still have the most posts.In post 2599, Battle Mage wrote:we're on course for a 1000 page Day 1, keep it up guys...
Wanted to revisit this and say thanks, but if you're town you don't want to visit me.In post 2448, MariaR wrote:Cabd would you like me to visit you so you can pick me regardless or just leave it be?
We didIn post 2613, Battle Mage wrote:maybe - although if we did, surely people should have claimed and we should have co-ordinated it?In post 2609, midwaybear wrote:This is actually anti-town because we want to maximize driver/blade pairs.In post 2603, Battle Mage wrote:amended for protown reasons
nobody has even really pitched that in the last 100 pages?
i mean scum will have lots of info that way i assume, but w/eIn post 2614, Cabd wrote:Correction, we want to maximize blade/driver pairs without anyone knowing who paired with who until after it occurred.In post 2609, midwaybear wrote:This is actually anti-town because we want to maximize driver/blade pairs.In post 2603, Battle Mage wrote:amended for protown reasons
Literally read back a page and a half to where I answered 2 dead presidents.In post 2597, Gamma Emerald wrote:@LLD why did you enter the game like you did, if you explained and I missed it?
ah i missed that - is there a list somewhere?In post 2619, Dunnstral wrote:We didIn post 2613, Battle Mage wrote:maybe - although if we did, surely people should have claimed and we should have co-ordinated it?In post 2609, midwaybear wrote:This is actually anti-town because we want to maximize driver/blade pairs.In post 2603, Battle Mage wrote:amended for protown reasons
nobody has even really pitched that in the last 100 pages?
Yeah, scum knowing who paired means that they should be able to deduce who is driver, who is blade, who isn't, ...In post 2614, Cabd wrote:Correction, we want to maximize blade/driver pairs without anyone knowing who paired with who until after it occurred.