Page 107 of 135

Posted: Thu Nov 24, 2016 7:08 am
by Naomi-Tan
Fun Fact; Nero Didn't post at all for the entire duration of D2 and has yet to post today as well (despite being active on the forums if you look up his posts done)

PEDIT: He said he had some kinda limit on his ability and didn't use it last night. (thus no result) it would make sense to be a Odd night limit else why not claim 1 shot or D1 only.

Posted: Thu Nov 24, 2016 7:10 am
by ArcAngel9
In post 2648, MortFeld wrote:Is odd night cop a thing?

I'm starting to see potential town motivations for Chaos not to tell us who he targeted. I'm fine with his decision for now.

Okay Mort. So what do you think it is? I am ready to bet that i could be wrong but i want to know how you come to this consensus?

I am tired of dealing with VT's in this game. I have a suggestion that might work and even confirms if Chaos is town.

We go with no-lynch today. What do you think?

Posted: Thu Nov 24, 2016 7:11 am
by ArcAngel9
In post 2650, Naomi-Tan wrote:Fun Fact; Nero Didn't post at all for the entire duration of D2 and has yet to post today as well (despite being active on the forums if you look up his posts done)

PEDIT: He said he had some kinda limit on his ability and didn't use it last night. (thus no result) it would make sense to be a Odd night limit else why not claim 1 shot or D1 only.

And you were sure that Nero is scum, If he hasn't been around, How did he manage to submit his night kill?

Posted: Thu Nov 24, 2016 7:12 am
by MortFeld
In post 2649, ArcAngel9 wrote:
In post 2646, Naomi-Tan wrote:I am using my head. we have a one shot Pr. a Jailer and what i'm guessing is an Odd night cop. VS 3 Reds and one strongman user. So one mafia that negates Jailor protection. which means the game would be red tilted. we was lucky with the D1 lynch and D2 lynch but this whole not killing nero thing is just urgh >_<
Why are you keep guessing that Chaos is limited or Odd night cop.

Didn't see what Mort indicating as well. Chaos is not revealing who he has targetted in his first post make no sense. He knows how to play this game. Day 2 he came back and confirmed his result with a name but Day 3 he comes back with no information and doesn't even reveal who he has targetted.

doesn't it lead you to any suspicion?
Of course it does. But if he's some sort of limited Cop, it makes sense to not tell the scum exactly what his limitations are, right?

Posted: Thu Nov 24, 2016 7:12 am
by MortFeld
^ This is actually a question. I don't know a lot of the theory surrounding PRs.

Posted: Thu Nov 24, 2016 7:13 am
by Shadow_step
I knew he could be odd night cop or have a non consecutive modifier. Which is why I was shush about it you guys just love giving info to scum.
:roll:

Posted: Thu Nov 24, 2016 7:16 am
by MortFeld
In post 2655, Shadow_step wrote:I knew he could be odd night cop or have a non consecutive modifier. Which is why I was shush about it you guys just love giving info to scum.
:roll:
[WIFOM] Obviously if he's scum he could be using this to prevent himself from being backed into a corner with results.

Posted: Thu Nov 24, 2016 7:16 am
by Naomi-Tan
Okay i'm gonna put this out there; the only counter to my hard push on nero has been chaos. IS everyone in agreement that by POE only Nero, chaos and myself as possible reds? (i've auto eliminated myself but could see that POV) IF you guys are in this agreement may I suggest the following

Today we lynch nero. and jail myself (allowing the cop to get one use out if he is like I expect odd night) then D4 we can have 2 more confirmed if we don't win on the nero thing. It would mean that the next night (when the cop doesn't get an action) we can jail them to make sure im right and at that stage we will be down to the people I've eliminated or most people have (mort, Misa, Cooper and there replacements)


PEDIT; Not posting =/= being around. He is posting else where as I pointed out. he is around but not inputting at all.

Posted: Thu Nov 24, 2016 7:17 am
by ArcAngel9
In post 2654, MortFeld wrote:^ This is actually a question. I don't know a lot of the theory surrounding PRs.

I don't disagree. It's a good bet but there is something i don't feel good about this.

Anyway, I suggest we go "No Lynch" today so that we don't lynch a townie. what do you think?

I will have Chaos confirmed tomorrow. If Chaos is not scum, I won't survive tonight.

Posted: Thu Nov 24, 2016 7:18 am
by ArcAngel9
In post 2657, Naomi-Tan wrote:Okay i'm gonna put this out there; the only counter to my hard push on nero has been chaos. IS everyone in agreement that by POE only Nero, chaos and myself as possible reds? (i've auto eliminated myself but could see that POV) IF you guys are in this agreement may I suggest the following

Today we lynch nero. and jail myself (allowing the cop to get one use out if he is like I expect odd night) then D4 we can have 2 more confirmed if we don't win on the nero thing. It would mean that the next night (when the cop doesn't get an action) we can jail them to make sure im right and at that stage we will be down to the people I've eliminated or most people have (mort, Misa, Cooper and there replacements)


PEDIT; Not posting =/= being around. He is posting else where as I pointed out. he is around but not inputting at all.

Nero is not scum. You, yourself confirmed that he is possible town than scum.

Posted: Thu Nov 24, 2016 7:20 am
by ArcAngel9
In post 2656, MortFeld wrote:
In post 2655, Shadow_step wrote:I knew he could be odd night cop or have a non consecutive modifier. Which is why I was shush about it you guys just love giving info to scum.
:roll:
[WIFOM] Obviously if he's scum he could be using this to prevent himself from being backed into a corner with results.
Which is exactly why we should follow my suggestion.

We could solve this riddle without mislynching a townie today. And you will have a two confirm townies in your list to continue on.

Posted: Thu Nov 24, 2016 7:20 am
by MortFeld
In post 2656, MortFeld wrote:
In post 2655, Shadow_step wrote:I knew he could be odd night cop or have a non consecutive modifier. Which is why I was shush about it you guys just love giving info to scum.
:roll:
[WIFOM] Obviously if he's scum he could be using this to prevent himself from being backed into a corner with results.
Is that WIFOM? In FGs we'd just call it yomi.
In post 2658, ArcAngel9 wrote:
In post 2654, MortFeld wrote:^ This is actually a question. I don't know a lot of the theory surrounding PRs.

I don't disagree. It's a good bet but there is something i don't feel good about this.

Anyway, I suggest we go "No Lynch" today so that we don't lynch a townie. what do you think?

I will have Chaos confirmed tomorrow. If Chaos is not scum, I won't survive tonight.
You're not surviving tonight anyway. We should lynch someone.
In post 2657, Naomi-Tan wrote: Today we lynch nero. and jail myself (allowing the cop to get one use out if he is like I expect odd night) then D4 we can have 2 more confirmed if we don't win on the nero thing. It would mean that the next night (when the cop doesn't get an action) we can jail them to make sure im right and at that stage we will be down to the people I've eliminated or most people have (mort, Misa, Cooper and there replacements)
Jail Shadow.

Posted: Thu Nov 24, 2016 7:20 am
by Naomi-Tan
In post 2658, ArcAngel9 wrote:
In post 2654, MortFeld wrote:^ This is actually a question. I don't know a lot of the theory surrounding PRs.

I don't disagree. It's a good bet but there is something i don't feel good about this.

Anyway, I suggest we go "No Lynch" today so that we don't lynch a townie. what do you think?

I will have Chaos confirmed tomorrow. If Chaos is not scum, I won't survive tonight.
no we have 8 green to 1 red there is no reason to no lynch. when all the cards are in our favour. even if we miss lynch today that puts us 6 to 1, a miss lynch tomorrow 4 to 1 and another ml? 2 to 1 and thats assuming we don't prevent any kills. we can miss lynch 3 times in a row without consequences.

Posted: Thu Nov 24, 2016 7:22 am
by Naomi-Tan
The only thing I confirmed Arc was nero is actively avoiding posting in the thread AKA Lurking. Which is a red tell at this stage. If we lose because everyone is too dense to kill the obvious red I will be extremely irritated at you all.

Posted: Thu Nov 24, 2016 7:23 am
by MortFeld
In post 2663, Naomi-Tan wrote:The only thing I confirmed Arc was nero is actively avoiding posting in the thread AKA Lurking. Which is a red tell at this stage. If we lose because everyone is too dense to kill the obvious red I will be extremely irritated at you all.
We're going to kill someone, probably Nero. Just not right at this moment before he or others can even post.

Posted: Thu Nov 24, 2016 7:25 am
by Shadow_step
Jail Shadow? Really? What are you smoking.
We are not no lynching today. It doesn't help us in any way.

Posted: Thu Nov 24, 2016 7:27 am
by Naomi-Tan
@MOD You need to poke nero for not posting in 48 hours. unless he has submitted night actions His last post on the forum was 4 days 23 hours ago


A quick list of people who have posted since his last post;
Drone, Human Sequencer, Toto

Thats gives you an idea of how long he has been lurking.

Posted: Thu Nov 24, 2016 7:27 am
by Shadow_step
Naomi will you stop posting BS please. Why is LUV town? Why is RK town?

Posted: Thu Nov 24, 2016 7:28 am
by Naomi-Tan
Now we wait. if he has submitted Night actions he won't get proded. if he has then he won't get prodded. Consider this a litmus test for active lurking

Posted: Thu Nov 24, 2016 7:30 am
by MortFeld
In post 2665, Shadow_step wrote:Jail Shadow? Really? What are you smoking.
I think I'm smoking post tone. Naomi's posts feel townier than Shadow's do. But Shadow can be a lynch later, sure let's jail Naomi.

Posted: Thu Nov 24, 2016 7:30 am
by Naomi-Tan
Luv is town for generally decent posts. there spread out but imo generally are pretty substantial posts you can definitely see them trying to work out the game within them.

As for RK... Well that comes from red interactions... I'll get some choice quotes setup.

Posted: Thu Nov 24, 2016 7:34 am
by MortFeld
Drone could have been distancing from Road but he helped take Road to L-1, and maintained Road's guilt later on... it's a very hard stance to take for a scum buddy.

Posted: Thu Nov 24, 2016 7:34 am
by MortFeld
This would all be solved if we jailed RK instead of rb.

Posted: Thu Nov 24, 2016 7:37 am
by ArcAngel9
Mort - you want to take a risk of lynching someone town?

You and I know very well that I won't survive tonight and I want to confirm if Chaos is really town or not.

If we go through no lynch today, On D4 you will have Chaos is confirmed town, RB confirmed town.

You will be left with Naomi, Liz, RK, Nero and yourself to know who is scum among you.

OR

If the chaos is scum, even better. the game is over. We will bag a perfect town lynch victory.

Posted: Thu Nov 24, 2016 7:40 am
by MortFeld
In post 2673, ArcAngel9 wrote:Mort - you want to take a risk of lynching someone town?

You and I know very well that I won't survive tonight and I want to confirm if Chaos is really town or not.

If we go through no lynch today, On D4 you will have Chaos is confirmed town, RB confirmed town.

You will be left with Naomi, Liz, RK, Nero and yourself to know who is scum among you.

OR

If the chaos is scum, even better. the game is over. We will bag a perfect town lynch victory.
Why would no lynch today result in Chaos confirmed town? All it results in is you dead and us in the same position tomorrow. You dying or not dying doesn't confirm Chaos at all...