Mafiascum.net

In post 2571, MOMOMEN wrote:Mastina and Nico, come hammer please.

I could almost ask you and Sudo to do that on Wisdom, soooooooooooooooooooo.
Respectably, no. I quite like my Wisdom wagon.

In post 2582, Wisdom wrote:mastina should stay out of my games if she plans to just tunnel me all game

I don't tunnel you.

I tunnel players I think are scum.

I think you are scum and thus I tunnel you.

But I'm not tunneling YOU.

And I have pretty damn good reasons for this.

In post 2599, MOMOMEN wrote:sudo made my partner quit the site my vote isnt leaving that slot for the game

I'm going to be blunt.



We are assholes.
People quit the site because we're assholes.
Tough luck, doesn't change our alignment.

Now go lynch scum.

In post 2605, Momrangal wrote:I feel like there is one scum between sudowoodo and cheeky based off mechanics. Where do you stand on that

I consider mechanics to be very largely null and if they do have an influence, for it to be augmenting and enhancing play--which would indicate town, not scum, for both.

In post 2651, mastina wrote:

In post 2582, Wisdom wrote:mastina should stay out of my games if she plans to just tunnel me all game

I don't tunnel you.

I tunnel players I think are scum.

I think you are scum and thus I tunnel you.

But I'm not tunneling YOU.

And I have pretty damn good reasons for this.

no you dont
you havent tried to reconsider once
you just blindly assign scum motivation to everything i do
paranoia is fine, poe is fine, but everything has a limit

In post 2614, Wisdom wrote:mastina who is scum when you see me flip town?

Well you're , but in that hypothetical world.

What makes my scumreads change?

Nothing. Still lynching MariaR/Kokichi Oma first and then looking to RedFlavor after that as a start.

In post 2618, Wisdom wrote:I want to see how you'll apologize for all this bs when you see my flip

I don't do apologies, sorry.

of course you dont
just gtfo from my games

In post 2629, Wisdom wrote:its unacceptable tunneling me from page 1 to page 106 without reconsidering for a moment

You know.

This sentiment seems oddly familiar to me.

I wonder why?

So in honor of that apparently being a game you looked up to me in.

Instead of responding to you.

I'll instead point to my iso.

Because my response to Bulbazak still works to this very day as a response to your point RE: tunneling.
You didn't seem to have an issue with my response to him back then, I wonder why you seem to have an issue with it now?

In post 2575, Wisdom wrote:dont lynch mara before red ffs

So mastina. I'm scum for posting content? Have you ever seen any of my town games?

Since you likely dont know anything about me

https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=75418

Iso this game where I led town to victory by content. By leading on scum day 1 and hammering scum with maki on LYLO

In post 2633, CheekyTeeky wrote:Maybe, maybe not. I feel like she makes more sense than Wisdom if that counts for anything. Idrc about AtE though so suck it up people.

Yeah that's the thing.

It's not that I don't reconsider.

That's what people trying to discredit me say.

I reconsider plenty.

It's just that when the evidence points to someone being scum.

It points to that player being fucking scum.

And I am not going to lie.
I am not going to fake a read change.
And say it doesn't.

The reason my Wisdom read hasn't changed is that he has no content which changes the read--quite the opposite, his content continues to reinforce the read because he is continuing to do things that make sense for him to do as scum and do not make sense for him to do as town.

yeah just assign scum motivation to my complaining

next you should argue scum receive role pms, i definitely received a role pm, so i am scum

In post 2661, mastina wrote:It's just that when the evidence points to someone being scum.

what evidence? the one you are making out of your ass?
sure, if you want to see someone as scum, you will see them as scum

In post 2654, Wisdom wrote:you havent tried to reconsider once
you just blindly assign scum motivation to everything i do
paranoia is fine, poe is fine, but everything has a limit

Yeah the thing is.
Reconsidering on you WOULD be just that. Paranoia. Nothing more, nothing less. It would be doubts based off of nothing, with no grounding in reality. Because the evidence points to scum and you are doing the scum thing even in this post. 2654 is still scum. Because you are still displaying the same exact traits.

The same traits which further a scum wincon.
And do nothing to further a town wincon.
The same traits which push a pro-scum agenda.
And don't push a town agenda.

It's not that I'm blindly assigning scum motivation to everything you do.
It's that all there IS is scum motivation. Because that's your fucking alignment so that's what I'm fucking seeing.

In post 2659, Kokichi Oma wrote:I'm scum for posting content?

No, but you're scum for the type of content you did post.

In post 2661, mastina wrote:and do not make sense for him to do as town.

lol
It doesnt make sense for me to try to solve the game
It doesnt make sense for me to try and work with my townreads
It doesnt make sense for me to try and compromise when my scumreads are not reaching a lynch
It doesnt make sense to fucking try and work even with people who scumread me, see Nico and you
Nothing makes sense
I am a robot who should be blindly deathtunneling like youre doing in order to fit the usual "town-Wisdom" image you have in your mind and anything different to that is a scumclaim

In post 2665, mastina wrote:

In post 2659, Kokichi Oma wrote:I'm scum for posting content?

No, but you're scum for the type of content you did post.

Which content? And explain why. I must have missed it

VOTE: Wisdom I might be pocketed.

I want Koki first tbh because I'm most confident of my read there, so if a wagon springs up there I'll be tres bon!

In post 2662, Wisdom wrote:next you should argue scum receive role pms, i definitely received a role pm, so i am scum

You jest, but actually, there's a difference between scum confirm posts and town confirm posts, but that's a useless tangent to this game so I digress.

In post 2663, Wisdom wrote:

In post 2661, mastina wrote:It's just that when the evidence points to someone being scum.

what evidence?

The evidence I have both implicitly hinted at without explaining outright, and the evidence I have explicitly given which you conveniently ignore; I've raised a BUNDLELOAD of points that you just brush over.

In post 2664, mastina wrote:And do nothing to further a town wincon.

I am town and you are scumreading me. What is the town thing to do if not show you how you are wrong and how we should be working together to lynch scum?
Which I've been fucking doing from the beginning of this ridiculous tunnel?

In post 2666, Wisdom wrote:It doesnt make sense for me to try to solve the game

Oh it does you just haven't.

In post 2666, Wisdom wrote:It doesnt make sense for me to try and work with my townreads

Oh it does just not in the way you have.

In post 2666, Wisdom wrote:It doesnt make sense for me to try and compromise when my scumreads are not reaching a lynch

As a matter of fact? Yes, it doesn't make sense.

In post 2666, Wisdom wrote:It doesnt make sense to fucking try and work even with people who scumread me, see Nico and you

Oh it does, just not in the way you've done it.

There's scum ways of doing those things and town ways of doing those things; you are doing the scum ways.

Mastina is just bad town. Cheeky is scum budding mastina

fuck you

In post 2670, Wisdom wrote:What is the town thing to do if not show you how you are wrong and how we should be working together to lynch scum?

There is an answer to this, but respectably, now is not the time for me to give it.