Posted: Tue Jul 10, 2018 8:12 am
do you believe it's good to have fluid readsIn post 2639, Golden Robster wrote:flavor leaf is near the middle of your reads
or to take hard stances
do you believe it's good to have fluid readsIn post 2639, Golden Robster wrote:flavor leaf is near the middle of your reads
Wait, how? He literally said "You think KK is my partner? Let's change that" and then votes. I don't see how that could be construed the way you're reading it.In post 2551, JarJarDrinks wrote:Yeah if anything I read this as the opposite. Like android wants you to think he's buddies w/ KK.In post 2549, Lalendra wrote:Are you saying one vote should be enough to make me go "Oh wow, they're definitely not scumbuddies because Android would NEVER bus, I guess he's locktown now!"In post 2533, Andriod18 wrote:This would imply you scumread KK as my partner yes? Let's change thatIn post 2503, Lalendra wrote:Those are good points. I'm not sure what to make of the language and attitude in KK's posts - as you said, it is his town meta, but would be easy to fake - but the fact that KK ignored the Android wagon is very troubling to me.
As a matter of fact, I also would like to see more from Android.
VOTE: Andriod18
VOTE: Kublai Khan
This is where I am at on the GROB/FL mason claim as well. As soon as I saw Rob's confirmation of his mason role with FL I thought, how do we know they are legit masons and not just scumbuddies gambling on there not being any real masons to CC them?In post 2633, wavemode wrote:I'm just looking for some sort of evidence from either of you that this wasn't just scum distancing
Wait, I'm so confused. So Rob isn't really a mason, he claimed mason with FL just to call FL's bluff, and then FL didn't react? hmm. This changes things.
I'm saying that this is the way I'm interpreting it.In post 2654, Lalendra wrote:Wait, how? He literally said "You think KK is my partner? Let's change that" and then votes. I don't see how that could be construed the way you're reading it.In post 2551, JarJarDrinks wrote:Yeah if anything I read this as the opposite. Like android wants you to think he's buddies w/ KK.In post 2549, Lalendra wrote:Are you saying one vote should be enough to make me go "Oh wow, they're definitely not scumbuddies because Android would NEVER bus, I guess he's locktown now!"In post 2533, Andriod18 wrote:This would imply you scumread KK as my partner yes? Let's change thatIn post 2503, Lalendra wrote:Those are good points. I'm not sure what to make of the language and attitude in KK's posts - as you said, it is his town meta, but would be easy to fake - but the fact that KK ignored the Android wagon is very troubling to me.
As a matter of fact, I also would like to see more from Android.
VOTE: Andriod18
VOTE: Kublai Khan
This is so bizarre.In post 2657, Lalendra wrote:Wait, I'm so confused. So Rob isn't really a mason, he claimed mason with FL just to call FL's bluff, and then FL didn't react? hmm. This changes things.
VOTE: Flavor Leaf
No fucking clue, haven't read most of d2In post 2651, Hopkirk wrote:So how're everyone's read lists looking?
because in order to lynch someone you need to put votes on them.
this is perhaps a bit blunt, but is mylo a weak scum player? i actually view this as a towntell if he's not b/c I think Scum are generally a little bit more worried about appearance. this seems much more town-realizing-he's-not-voting with a dash of lazyIn post 2548, Lalendra wrote:Because of the progression. Mylo doesn't mention PP anywhere in his ISO and then:In post 2515, Golden Robster wrote:talk to me why you believe this?In post 2474, Lalendra wrote:Mylo slipped down to scumlean on my list with that vote on PP. I don't see any reason for it at all, andit seemed like he was opportunistically picking on someone that he knew was not around when he was pressured to throw down a vote.
In post 2417, PenguinPower wrote:Responding to my prod. I'm busy tonight and tomorrow morning, but I'll be back tomorrow afternoon.He hadn't mentioned Mylo since his vote for him in 1947 - 470 posts earlier. Mylo dropped a vote there when asked for a vote and came up with some weak reasoning, didn't even really try to back it up. So, it looked like he was opportunistically throwing a vote on someone who had literally just said they wouldn't be around to defend themselves and using OMGUS and vague "I don't see any reason for them to be town so they must be scum" as an excuse.In post 2437, Myloninja13 wrote:I guess I could VOTE: PP because OMGUS and they haven't really done anything to town read them on.In post 2436, texcat wrote:Are you going to vote for anyone?
In post 2667, Hopkirk wrote:I'm concerned about the number of people asking FL to fullclaim when he's got 5 votes on him. Attracting more votes after a PR claim that weren't there before seems like prime position for scum rolefishing. Nobody's asked KK to claim yet (and he shouldn't be expect to).
Most obviously applicable to Lalendra. I'd need to look back on who said he should have a partner claim but hasn't voted him.
You can have as many modifiers on top of your one role I believe, and mason is a role iircIn post 2672, Hopkirk wrote:Hood
-Ausuka the IC
-Performer the lynched veneful
-Wave the living
If you want to lynch in the neighbourhood, you want to lynch Wave.
Can masons even have modifiers in a normal?
I'd suggest looking at KK (where I'm voting), FL (to decide if you buy the claim), Wave (Neighbour), Android (yesterday's leading lynch for a time and only survivor of a large wagon), and the other lurkers since it'll be quick (Wheme, yourself, Mylo, Scion, Pine whoever else slips my mind due to lack of presence).
Time to sleep.
I don't see what's so hard to get about it. One of those lynches is probably a mislynch, getting FL's partner to claim helps me determine which it is. I could lynch Wave now, I guess, and leave the second mason unclaimed, but I'd rather lynch more accurately.In post 2669, Hopkirk wrote:Why would you want to lynch within masons if a partner claimed?
Based on what you've said (wanting to lynch within masons/neighs)
Either you doubt the claim, in which case you should want to lynch FL.
Or you believe the claim and you should want to lynch Wave.
But you're saying you want a mason partner to claimthenyou want to vote within the 3 people. That definitely doesn't make sense.