In theory a dictatorship (/monarchy) is the best type of government ~ ~ ~
Posted: Mon Mar 04, 2019 8:14 am
by Ankamius
I'd like to see the case
Posted: Mon Mar 04, 2019 8:21 am
by YellowSnow
Who is actually in the neighborhood? If we look at who didn't vote for CoA and contrast that against who isn't in the neighborhood maybe that would be a good place to start.
Posted: Mon Mar 04, 2019 8:22 am
by Ankamius
If I am reading the dead list correctly, it's every single dead slot + Tarkus + me
In post 2601, Tarkus wrote:
RC: If he "knew" CoA and Morality were both town then it makes sense for him to change wagons late. If CoA dies anyways then he's off a "town" lynch, killed a strong player who hadn't really gotten going yet, and he can rage about people not following him onto Morality. If people followed onto Morailty then he gets a lynch on one of his biggest opponents and I think he has the confidence that it wouldn't come back to bite him. Either way he gets reactions like 2574. There's also a possibility that he somehow got tipped off to CoA being traitor in which case it makes even more sense to try for a shift onto Morality. He was a dominant force D1 and I frankly don't believe that town!RC would be so wrong about a game he was so heavily invested in. Maybe that's a dumb way to read him but I feel it. I'm also inclined to follow Creature's call.
You've put forward a hypothetical scenario as a case. I agree, if RC was doing that it would look pretty bad. Can you point to where you think he is doing that?
Is that not what happened end of day 1? He had lock-scum on CoA, unvoted because he was mad nobody was listening, then the wagon picked up, then he hard objected to lynching CoA, and then he went onto BnH and then Morality. I think that's the accurate path of his wagon shift
Posted: Mon Mar 04, 2019 8:25 am
by YellowSnow
So that leaves a lynch pool of Vorkuta, Smart, Dunn and Johnny
Tarkus wrote:
YS: RC connection and I think he's been in his scum range here. His focus on scumreading lurking and lack of contribution but then not scumreading me until today (I think?) sets off alarms.
I hate it when you get pinged because you DON'T scumread someone. I mean how are you supposed to respond to that? The fact is that there were other fish to fry at the time. It doesn't mean I didn't think you were scummy.
I mean, there are ways to explain it
In post 2632, YellowSnow wrote:Tarkus criticizing me for not scumreading him when we have not mislynched yet is enough reason to vote him now.
What does not having mislynched yet have to do with pointing out an inconsistency in the way you were going about your reads?
Posted: Mon Mar 04, 2019 8:30 am
by Tarkus
Wait vedith was the one who covertly brought the idea of lynching within the hood to the main thread. I kinda doubt he does that as scum
Posted: Mon Mar 04, 2019 8:31 am
by YellowSnow
There's no inconsistancy. I call it as I see it. You should be more worried about those who didn't vote for CoH than nitpicking me.
Posted: Mon Mar 04, 2019 8:31 am
by YellowSnow
CoA I mean.
Posted: Mon Mar 04, 2019 8:32 am
by Tarkus
Do you think CoA crumbed traitor somewhere?
Posted: Mon Mar 04, 2019 8:34 am
by YellowSnow
Obviously. I don't know where though.
Posted: Mon Mar 04, 2019 8:59 am
by Tarkus
Presumably with her reads I would think
CoA:
Townread vork, shoshin
Townlean RC,
RCE
,
Creature
Called you null leaning towards lynchbait
No expressed read on Morality
Scumlean on BnH early but did not follow up
Preferred lynch for the day was me and
DDL
, vedith was 'not bad'
Actually maybe my pool is the same as yours but swapping Ank out with you.