Posted: Sun Sep 13, 2020 7:30 am
What’s up
https://forum.mafiascum-staging.net/
Yeah. That CET life on MS.In post 2652, Gamma Emerald wrote:I think your activity times just don’t line up with the rest of us, except I guess jjh
In post 2655, Kaname Date wrote:jjh: i'll take your word for it! i'm working with limited info. :>
Fish: cool. your role certainly fits.
hi tris, if you're town now is the time to show it so we don't lose with your miselimination.
no pressure.if you're scum sit back and relax, i guess.
In post 2660, Hayasaka wrote:my track has lower value then FLs public roleblock correct?
Scum can play around both but I think his role trumps mine now that I am outed and can just get shot.
Although I guess if we go for Gamma then technicallyTris is body guarding me if we trust that.
~MIn post 2300, tris wrote:In post 2298, Venus Mars and Pluto wrote:I just think if your conditional bg was real, I wouldn’t have gotten the response that the mods couldn’t answer any of it. Why wouldn’t they have just backed you up if true? And why would either or Hya need to have done that anyway? Like in what world would either Hya or myself refuse the “I do”? No one in their right mind rehects a bg offer. And now you’re saying Hya isn’t protected but I am?In post 2297, Venus Mars and Pluto wrote:Either you were bus drove or Hya’s lying and first one sounds iffy and second, extremely unlikely.
Gamma’s probably already given up. I admit from a purely emotional pov, I would prefer him today but Hya is saying you weren’t bus driven to Amy, so that is literally the only way you’re not guiltied and occams razer says that’s unlikely but she says that’s impossible and I don’t see why he’d lie.
Plus, why wouldn’t Maria have confirmed to both of us your “I do”, why just you? I was expecting Dunn to confirm your conditional bg on us being real and I think it would have been confirmed if it were true. I asked specifically to have both the “I do” thing confirmed and your part in submitting it and was told the mods couldn’t confirm any of it and now you’ve gotten confirmation of our “I do” but we’ve still gotten absolutely nothing.
~Mit has to happen each night. hya was protected the first night.
why would you refuse? because you don't trust me maybe. like what if you're agreeing to something bad?
Why would we go for Gamma? You tracked Amy to Tris. Sure Amy could have been the target but Tris was also Amy’s #1 scumread. BEF roleblocked Gamma, so we know Gamma couldn’t have bus driven Tris, plus I actually believe the odd night thing. It fits with Amy/BEF’s even night roles and jjh’s odd night Arcana invest. We know that whomeever killed Amy, it 100% could not have been Gamma, so it’s either Tris or it’s a frame but in the extremely unlikely chance it’s an actual frame, it obviously couldn’t have been by Gamma. Then there’s the fact, that despite all of my questions to the mods regarding that, none of my questions regarding the “I do” thing have been answered. Tris claims the mods confirmed mine to her but so far I’ve heard absolutely nothing about it from them. Considering I got feedback regarding my TA on Gamma, which was a negative but because my role was outed, not a clear but in no way a guilty, in what world do you think fading a player that we don’t even know for sure is scum, makes more sense to you then fading very likely mechanically outed scum?In post 2660, Hayasaka wrote:my track has lower value then FLs public roleblock correct?
Scum can play around both but I think his role trumps mine now that I am outed and can just get shot.
Although I guess if we go for Gamma then technically Tris is body guarding me if we trust that.
@HyaIn post 2662, Venus Mars and Pluto wrote:Why would we go for Gamma? You tracked Amy to Tris. Sure Amy could have been the target but Tris was also Amy’s #1 scumread. BEF roleblocked Gamma, so we know Gamma couldn’t have bus driven Tris, plus I actually believe the odd night thing. It fits with Amy/BEF’s even night roles and jjh’s odd night Arcana invest. We know that whomeever killed Amy, it 100% could not have been Gamma, so it’s either Tris or it’s a frame but in the extremely unlikely chance it’s an actual frame, it obviously couldn’t have been by Gamma. Then there’s the fact, that despite all of my questions to the mods regarding that, none of my questions regarding the “I do” thing have been answered. Tris claims the mods confirmed mine to her but so far I’ve heard absolutely nothing about it from them. Considering I got feedback regarding my TA on Gamma, which was a negative but because my role was outed, not a clear but in no way a guilty, in what world do you think fading a player that we don’t even know for sure is scum, makes more sense to you then fading very likely mechanically outed scum?In post 2660, Hayasaka wrote:my track has lower value then FLs public roleblock correct?
Scum can play around both but I think his role trumps mine now that I am outed and can just get shot.
Although I guess if we go for Gamma then technically Tris is body guarding me if we trust that.
We KNOW Gamma wasn’t the reason Amy died, we should fade the slot whom the bulk of the evidence points to who was the most likely responsible for killing her.
~M
Since Amy was self-redirector, we have absolutely no proof that you protected Hya. Why? Why wouldn’t I get told about it?In post 2667, tris wrote:because you just don't get told about it. like do you think the mod is going to confirm my role to you?
Wait, so Hya was only protected N1 according to you and us LAST night? So, neither Hya or us are protected tonight, assuming this isn’t completely bogus, which I have serious doubts about anyway.In post 2300, tris wrote:In post 2298, Venus Mars and Pluto wrote:I just think if your conditional bg was real, I wouldn’t have gotten the response that the mods couldn’t answer any of it. Why wouldn’t they have just backed you up if true? And why would either or Hya need to have done that anyway? Like in what world would either Hya or myself refuse the “I do”? No one in their right mind rehects a bg offer. And now you’re saying Hya isn’t protected but I am?In post 2297, Venus Mars and Pluto wrote:Either you were bus drove or Hya’s lying and first one sounds iffy and second, extremely unlikely.
Gamma’s probably already given up. I admit from a purely emotional pov, I would prefer him today but Hya is saying you weren’t bus driven to Amy, so that is literally the only way you’re not guiltied and occams razer says that’s unlikely but she says that’s impossible and I don’t see why he’d lie.
Plus, why wouldn’t Maria have confirmed to both of us your “I do”, why just you? I was expecting Dunn to confirm your conditional bg on us being real and I think it would have been confirmed if it were true. I asked specifically to have both the “I do” thing confirmed and your part in submitting it and was told the mods couldn’t confirm any of it and now you’ve gotten confirmation of our “I do” but we’ve still gotten absolutely nothing.
~Mit has to happen each night. hya was protected the first night.
why would you refuse? because you don't trust me maybe. like what if you're agreeing to something bad?
why should you be told about it?In post 2669, Venus Mars and Pluto wrote:Since Amy was self-redirector, we have absolutely no proof that you protected Hya. Why? Why wouldn’t I get told about it?In post 2667, tris wrote:because you just don't get told about it. like do you think the mod is going to confirm my role to you?
You forget, that we STILL haven’t received any confirmation of your claim, so yeah it sounds kind of fishy to me.
But please explain to me why a slot that has been 100% cleared of being the reason for Amy dying ought to be faded over you and who do you think we ought to fade if NOT you?
Now I realize that it wasn’t you who is advocating for Gamma being faded, that was Hya. So, who do you think we should fade?
~M
each night that we PM the "I do" it happensIn post 2670, Venus Mars and Pluto wrote:Wait, so Hya was only protected N1 according to you and us LAST night? So, neither Hya or us are protected tonight, assuming this isn’t completely bogus, which I have serious doubts about anyway.In post 2300, tris wrote:In post 2298, Venus Mars and Pluto wrote:I just think if your conditional bg was real, I wouldn’t have gotten the response that the mods couldn’t answer any of it. Why wouldn’t they have just backed you up if true? And why would either or Hya need to have done that anyway? Like in what world would either Hya or myself refuse the “I do”? No one in their right mind rehects a bg offer. And now you’re saying Hya isn’t protected but I am?In post 2297, Venus Mars and Pluto wrote:Either you were bus drove or Hya’s lying and first one sounds iffy and second, extremely unlikely.
Gamma’s probably already given up. I admit from a purely emotional pov, I would prefer him today but Hya is saying you weren’t bus driven to Amy, so that is literally the only way you’re not guiltied and occams razer says that’s unlikely but she says that’s impossible and I don’t see why he’d lie.
Plus, why wouldn’t Maria have confirmed to both of us your “I do”, why just you? I was expecting Dunn to confirm your conditional bg on us being real and I think it would have been confirmed if it were true. I asked specifically to have both the “I do” thing confirmed and your part in submitting it and was told the mods couldn’t confirm any of it and now you’ve gotten confirmation of our “I do” but we’ve still gotten absolutely nothing.
~Mit has to happen each night. hya was protected the first night.
why would you refuse? because you don't trust me maybe. like what if you're agreeing to something bad?
BEF should optimally self-direct a commute on himself today, since he has no NAs tonight and KD has made it abundantly clear he has no interest in being neighbourized. Tris cant re-neighbourize either Hya or us and she’s pushing FL, so that completely destroys Hya’s argument for fading an exonerated slot over Tris.
Why am I literally the only one to consistently catch these things?
Can it work on more than 1 person?In post 2672, tris wrote:each night that we PM the "I do" it happensIn post 2670, Venus Mars and Pluto wrote:Wait, so Hya was only protected N1 according to you and us LAST night? So, neither Hya or us are protected tonight, assuming this isn’t completely bogus, which I have serious doubts about anyway.In post 2300, tris wrote:In post 2298, Venus Mars and Pluto wrote:I just think if your conditional bg was real, I wouldn’t have gotten the response that the mods couldn’t answer any of it. Why wouldn’t they have just backed you up if true? And why would either or Hya need to have done that anyway? Like in what world would either Hya or myself refuse the “I do”? No one in their right mind rehects a bg offer. And now you’re saying Hya isn’t protected but I am?In post 2297, Venus Mars and Pluto wrote:Either you were bus drove or Hya’s lying and first one sounds iffy and second, extremely unlikely.
Gamma’s probably already given up. I admit from a purely emotional pov, I would prefer him today but Hya is saying you weren’t bus driven to Amy, so that is literally the only way you’re not guiltied and occams razer says that’s unlikely but she says that’s impossible and I don’t see why he’d lie.
Plus, why wouldn’t Maria have confirmed to both of us your “I do”, why just you? I was expecting Dunn to confirm your conditional bg on us being real and I think it would have been confirmed if it were true. I asked specifically to have both the “I do” thing confirmed and your part in submitting it and was told the mods couldn’t confirm any of it and now you’ve gotten confirmation of our “I do” but we’ve still gotten absolutely nothing.
~Mit has to happen each night. hya was protected the first night.
why would you refuse? because you don't trust me maybe. like what if you're agreeing to something bad?
BEF should optimally self-direct a commute on himself today, since he has no NAs tonight and KD has made it abundantly clear he has no interest in being neighbourized. Tris cant re-neighbourize either Hya or us and she’s pushing FL, so that completely destroys Hya’s argument for fading an exonerated slot over Tris.
Why am I literally the only one to consistently catch these things?
flavor leaf. i don't buy the whole jester thingIn post 2669, Venus Mars and Pluto wrote: But please explain to me why a slot that has been 100% cleared of being the reason for Amy dying ought to be faded over you and who do you think we ought to fade if NOT you?
Now I realize that it wasn’t you who is advocating for Gamma being faded, that was Hya. So, who do you think we should fade?
~M