Page 107 of 173

Posted: Thu Jun 17, 2021 3:54 pm
by House
In post 2648, Mia and Maya Fey wrote:
In post 2624, House wrote:
In post 2622, Mia and Maya Fey wrote:
In post 2590, House wrote:Also, if you're wondering why I was hard defending you on d1, it's because I was trying to bait the NK by making scum think we were masons, which you wrecked when you asked me why I townread you so hard.
So you were actually pocketing us then?

:(

UNVOTE:

Maybe it is you? Have I been stupid again?
Signs point to yes. Depends on where you go from here.
What? One of you and moon is probably scum and the other is trolling me and I legit can’t tell which but moon is acting scummier. Unless, you’re a team weirdly distancing each other? I really can’t tell.
If we're a team, why won't Moon join me in the 1v1?

They've yet to crossvote. All talk but no walk.

Posted: Thu Jun 17, 2021 3:55 pm
by Mia and Maya Fey
In post 2628, Moongrass wrote:Norwegian is right it's Titus/House. That's why House is trying to get a wagon anywhere else.
I’m starting to think it actually could be you/House now.

Your interactions have been really strange this entire day.

Posted: Thu Jun 17, 2021 3:55 pm
by Gamma Emerald
Anyone who isn’t moongrass or Titus: tell me why those two are not the team
Because I personally haven’t seen anything to dissuade me from that

Posted: Thu Jun 17, 2021 3:56 pm
by House
In post 2652, Gamma Emerald wrote:Anyone who isn’t moongrass or Titus: tell me why those two are not the team
Because I personally haven’t seen anything to dissuade me from that
Help me bus, then!

Posted: Thu Jun 17, 2021 3:56 pm
by Mia and Maya Fey
In post 2629, House wrote:
In post 2626, Mia and Maya Fey wrote:
In post 2595, House wrote:
In post 2081, Jingle wrote:
Vote Count 1.FINAL
Not Known 15 (7):
, , , , , , ,
Moongrass (1):
,
Free Money Free Tea (1):
,
Mia and Maya Fey (1):
,
Titus (1):
,
nomnomnom (0):

jjh927 (0):

House (0):

cyrus62 (0):

mastina (0):

Not_Mafia (0):

Gamma Emerald (0):

DrippingGoofball (0):


No Euphemization (0):


Not Voting (2):
, ,

With 13 alive, it takes
7
to euphemize and
7
to have no euphemization.

The deadline for Day 1 is in (expired on 2021-06-17 17:00:00). At Deadline, currently No Euphemization will occur.


A Hammer has been achieved!


Not Known 15 has been made into a Euphemism Day 1.

He was:

Spoiler:
Mafia Informed Commuter Enabler

Informed Commuter EnablerYou are aware that [Redacted]. If you die, any commuters will be unable to commute.
I think my PoE pool is pretty accurate, and there is likely 1 scum on and 1 scum off the wagon.

I also believe the commuter enabler did not activate a town commuter, or one of the stumps would have vetoed the hammer as the claim was for commuter.

Scum most likely did not bus until the lim became inevitable.
Are you trolling me now? I was jk in Labrynth and when jk enabler got vigged, I became vt. :shifty:
And no, there was nothng in my role pm about an enabler.
It doesn't matter what the commuter potentially knows/knew.

It matters that the stumps did not select commuter as a town power role.

I'm leaning towards yes as an answer to your question.
How could you possibly have any idea who or what the stumps chose?

Posted: Thu Jun 17, 2021 3:57 pm
by House
In post 2652, Gamma Emerald wrote:Anyone who isn’t moongrass or Titus: tell me why those two are not the team
Because I personally haven’t seen anything to dissuade me from that
If I'm scum, why do I want the goodest of boys to come pay me a visit?

Posted: Thu Jun 17, 2021 3:58 pm
by Gamma Emerald
In post 2653, House wrote:
In post 2652, Gamma Emerald wrote:Anyone who isn’t moongrass or Titus: tell me why those two are not the team
Because I personally haven’t seen anything to dissuade me from that
Help me bus, then!
Okay, small correction: from THEM nothing I’ve seen is changing my mind
The game state is giving me doubts tho

Posted: Thu Jun 17, 2021 3:59 pm
by House
In post 2654, Mia and Maya Fey wrote:
In post 2629, House wrote:
In post 2626, Mia and Maya Fey wrote:
In post 2595, House wrote:
In post 2081, Jingle wrote:
Vote Count 1.FINAL
Not Known 15 (7):
, , , , , , ,
Moongrass (1):
,
Free Money Free Tea (1):
,
Mia and Maya Fey (1):
,
Titus (1):
,
nomnomnom (0):

jjh927 (0):

House (0):

cyrus62 (0):

mastina (0):

Not_Mafia (0):

Gamma Emerald (0):

DrippingGoofball (0):


No Euphemization (0):


Not Voting (2):
, ,

With 13 alive, it takes
7
to euphemize and
7
to have no euphemization.

The deadline for Day 1 is in (expired on 2021-06-17 17:00:00). At Deadline, currently No Euphemization will occur.


A Hammer has been achieved!


Not Known 15 has been made into a Euphemism Day 1.

He was:

Spoiler:
Mafia Informed Commuter Enabler

Informed Commuter EnablerYou are aware that [Redacted]. If you die, any commuters will be unable to commute.
I think my PoE pool is pretty accurate, and there is likely 1 scum on and 1 scum off the wagon.

I also believe the commuter enabler did not activate a town commuter, or one of the stumps would have vetoed the hammer as the claim was for commuter.

Scum most likely did not bus until the lim became inevitable.
Are you trolling me now? I was jk in Labrynth and when jk enabler got vigged, I became vt. :shifty:
And no, there was nothng in my role pm about an enabler.
It doesn't matter what the commuter potentially knows/knew.

It matters that the stumps did not select commuter as a town power role.

I'm leaning towards yes as an answer to your question.
How could you possibly have any idea who or what the stumps chose?
Do I really need to spell out the obvious?

NK was not hammered until both stumps gave the okay.

If either stump had chosen commuter, the claim would have been believed unless countered.

Also, nobody countered commuter before both stumps game the green light.

There. Is. No. Town. Commuter.

Posted: Thu Jun 17, 2021 4:00 pm
by Mia and Maya Fey
In post 2635, Titus wrote:
In post 2607, Moongrass wrote:Or no kill because the pool of suspects was shrinking especially if NM claimed today.
This is still levels of yucky.

VOTE: Moongrass

The amount of forcing he's trying to do to avoid the logical conclusion of a protected kill is baffling.
I feel good about my vote because you were right on her in GS.

@moon, you’re a “her” right? I don’t want to misgender you.

Posted: Thu Jun 17, 2021 4:02 pm
by Mia and Maya Fey
In post 2640, Titus wrote:I have pizza but the road out from my house is closed because of space lasers. :( Can I zoom instead?
I had pizza earlier. 3 kinds: artichoke goatcheese, veggie korma and pesto vegetarian.

Posted: Thu Jun 17, 2021 4:03 pm
by House
In post 2659, Mia and Maya Fey wrote:
In post 2640, Titus wrote:I have pizza but the road out from my house is closed because of space lasers. :( Can I zoom instead?
I had pizza earlier. 3 kinds: artichoke goatcheese, veggie korma and pesto vegetarian.
I'm a meat lover's guy, myself.

Throw a side of cow on anything and I'll probably eat it.

Posted: Thu Jun 17, 2021 4:04 pm
by Mia and Maya Fey
In post 2647, Gamma Emerald wrote:
In post 2615, Mia and Maya Fey wrote:I also along with Titus believed he had an actual guilty on Cyrus. That’s why I briefly voted him.
Was this on D1?
D2, where have you been? :lol:

Posted: Thu Jun 17, 2021 4:05 pm
by House
In post 2647, Gamma Emerald wrote:
In post 2615, Mia and Maya Fey wrote:I also along with Titus believed he had an actual guilty on Cyrus. That’s why I briefly voted him.
Was this on D1?
Aw man, you missed out on one of my fun ploys.

Also, how could I fake a guilty on d1? :lol:

Posted: Thu Jun 17, 2021 4:06 pm
by Gamma Emerald
In post 2661, Mia and Maya Fey wrote:
In post 2647, Gamma Emerald wrote:
In post 2615, Mia and Maya Fey wrote:I also along with Titus believed he had an actual guilty on Cyrus. That’s why I briefly voted him.
Was this on D1?
D2, where have you been? :lol:
very much out of it
In post 2662, House wrote:
In post 2647, Gamma Emerald wrote:
In post 2615, Mia and Maya Fey wrote:I also along with Titus believed he had an actual guilty on Cyrus. That’s why I briefly voted him.
Was this on D1?
Aw man, you missed out on one of my fun ploys.

Also, how could I fake a guilty on d1? :lol:
I mean that’s exactly why I asked if it was D1, because I was gonna question the people who bought the guilty if it was

Posted: Thu Jun 17, 2021 4:07 pm
by Mia and Maya Fey
In post 2652, Gamma Emerald wrote:Anyone who isn’t moongrass or Titus: tell me why those two are not the team
Because I personally haven’t seen anything to dissuade me from that
I quoted Titus’ posts near the end of d1. No offence to Titus but I don’t think Meryl Streep is getting worried.

Posted: Thu Jun 17, 2021 4:09 pm
by House
In post 2664, Mia and Maya Fey wrote:
In post 2652, Gamma Emerald wrote:Anyone who isn’t moongrass or Titus: tell me why those two are not the team
Because I personally haven’t seen anything to dissuade me from that
I quoted Titus’ posts near the end of d1. No offence to Titus but I don’t think Meryl Streep is getting worried.
Scum claim.

Meryl WISHES she could be Titus.

Posted: Thu Jun 17, 2021 4:10 pm
by Mia and Maya Fey
In post 2657, House wrote:
In post 2654, Mia and Maya Fey wrote:
In post 2629, House wrote:
In post 2626, Mia and Maya Fey wrote:
In post 2595, House wrote:
In post 2081, Jingle wrote:
Vote Count 1.FINAL
Not Known 15 (7):
, , , , , , ,
Moongrass (1):
,
Free Money Free Tea (1):
,
Mia and Maya Fey (1):
,
Titus (1):
,
nomnomnom (0):

jjh927 (0):

House (0):

cyrus62 (0):

mastina (0):

Not_Mafia (0):

Gamma Emerald (0):

DrippingGoofball (0):


No Euphemization (0):


Not Voting (2):
, ,

With 13 alive, it takes
7
to euphemize and
7
to have no euphemization.

The deadline for Day 1 is in (expired on 2021-06-17 17:00:00). At Deadline, currently No Euphemization will occur.


A Hammer has been achieved!


Not Known 15 has been made into a Euphemism Day 1.

He was:

Spoiler:
Mafia Informed Commuter Enabler

Informed Commuter EnablerYou are aware that [Redacted]. If you die, any commuters will be unable to commute.
I think my PoE pool is pretty accurate, and there is likely 1 scum on and 1 scum off the wagon.

I also believe the commuter enabler did not activate a town commuter, or one of the stumps would have vetoed the hammer as the claim was for commuter.

Scum most likely did not bus until the lim became inevitable.
Are you trolling me now? I was jk in Labrynth and when jk enabler got vigged, I became vt. :shifty:
And no, there was nothng in my role pm about an enabler.
It doesn't matter what the commuter potentially knows/knew.

It matters that the stumps did not select commuter as a town power role.

I'm leaning towards yes as an answer to your question.
How could you possibly have any idea who or what the stumps chose?
Do I really need to spell out the obvious?

NK was not hammered until both stumps gave the okay.

If either stump had chosen commuter, the claim would have been believed unless countered.

Also, nobody countered commuter before both stumps game the green light.

There. Is. No. Town. Commuter.
Did you not read my post about Labrynth? My role pm was loud town jk. I was never informed of an enabler until he got misvigged and my jk therefore failed.

Posted: Thu Jun 17, 2021 4:12 pm
by Mia and Maya Fey
In post 2665, House wrote:
In post 2664, Mia and Maya Fey wrote:
In post 2652, Gamma Emerald wrote:Anyone who isn’t moongrass or Titus: tell me why those two are not the team
Because I personally haven’t seen anything to dissuade me from that
I quoted Titus’ posts near the end of d1. No offence to Titus but I don’t think Meryl Streep is getting worried.
Scum claim.

Meryl WISHES she could be Titus.
yer funny. :lol:

Posted: Thu Jun 17, 2021 4:14 pm
by House
In post 2666, Mia and Maya Fey wrote:
In post 2657, House wrote:
In post 2654, Mia and Maya Fey wrote:
In post 2629, House wrote:
In post 2626, Mia and Maya Fey wrote:
In post 2595, House wrote:
In post 2081, Jingle wrote:
Vote Count 1.FINAL
Not Known 15 (7):
, , , , , , ,
Moongrass (1):
,
Free Money Free Tea (1):
,
Mia and Maya Fey (1):
,
Titus (1):
,
nomnomnom (0):

jjh927 (0):

House (0):

cyrus62 (0):

mastina (0):

Not_Mafia (0):

Gamma Emerald (0):

DrippingGoofball (0):


No Euphemization (0):


Not Voting (2):
, ,

With 13 alive, it takes
7
to euphemize and
7
to have no euphemization.

The deadline for Day 1 is in (expired on 2021-06-17 17:00:00). At Deadline, currently No Euphemization will occur.


A Hammer has been achieved!


Not Known 15 has been made into a Euphemism Day 1.

He was:

Spoiler:
Mafia Informed Commuter Enabler

Informed Commuter EnablerYou are aware that [Redacted]. If you die, any commuters will be unable to commute.
I think my PoE pool is pretty accurate, and there is likely 1 scum on and 1 scum off the wagon.

I also believe the commuter enabler did not activate a town commuter, or one of the stumps would have vetoed the hammer as the claim was for commuter.

Scum most likely did not bus until the lim became inevitable.
Are you trolling me now? I was jk in Labrynth and when jk enabler got vigged, I became vt. :shifty:
And no, there was nothng in my role pm about an enabler.
It doesn't matter what the commuter potentially knows/knew.

It matters that the stumps did not select commuter as a town power role.

I'm leaning towards yes as an answer to your question.
How could you possibly have any idea who or what the stumps chose?
Do I really need to spell out the obvious?

NK was not hammered until both stumps gave the okay.

If either stump had chosen commuter, the claim would have been believed unless countered.

Also, nobody countered commuter before both stumps game the green light.

There. Is. No. Town. Commuter.
Did you not read my post about Labrynth? My role pm was loud town jk. I was never informed of an enabler until he got misvigged and my jk therefore failed.
Did you not read where that is irrelevant?

You knew you were a JK, right?

A town commuter would have known they were, in fact, a town commuter.

A stump would have known that they did, in fact, choose commuter.

In no world ever would NK not have been countered if any kind of town commuter actually existed, and the stumps never would have authorized the hammer if they had submitted any kind of role that contained the word "commuter" In it.

Posted: Thu Jun 17, 2021 4:16 pm
by House
I think it's just Moon & jjh.

Posted: Thu Jun 17, 2021 4:22 pm
by Mia and Maya Fey
In post 2668, House wrote:
In post 2666, Mia and Maya Fey wrote:
In post 2657, House wrote:
In post 2654, Mia and Maya Fey wrote:
In post 2629, House wrote:
In post 2626, Mia and Maya Fey wrote:
In post 2595, House wrote:
In post 2081, Jingle wrote:
Vote Count 1.FINAL
Not Known 15 (7):
, , , , , , ,
Moongrass (1):
,
Free Money Free Tea (1):
,
Mia and Maya Fey (1):
,
Titus (1):
,
nomnomnom (0):

jjh927 (0):

House (0):

cyrus62 (0):

mastina (0):

Not_Mafia (0):

Gamma Emerald (0):

DrippingGoofball (0):


No Euphemization (0):


Not Voting (2):
, ,

With 13 alive, it takes
7
to euphemize and
7
to have no euphemization.

The deadline for Day 1 is in (expired on 2021-06-17 17:00:00). At Deadline, currently No Euphemization will occur.


A Hammer has been achieved!


Not Known 15 has been made into a Euphemism Day 1.

He was:

Spoiler:
Mafia Informed Commuter Enabler

Informed Commuter EnablerYou are aware that [Redacted]. If you die, any commuters will be unable to commute.
I think my PoE pool is pretty accurate, and there is likely 1 scum on and 1 scum off the wagon.

I also believe the commuter enabler did not activate a town commuter, or one of the stumps would have vetoed the hammer as the claim was for commuter.

Scum most likely did not bus until the lim became inevitable.
Are you trolling me now? I was jk in Labrynth and when jk enabler got vigged, I became vt. :shifty:
And no, there was nothng in my role pm about an enabler.
It doesn't matter what the commuter potentially knows/knew.

It matters that the stumps did not select commuter as a town power role.

I'm leaning towards yes as an answer to your question.
How could you possibly have any idea who or what the stumps chose?
Do I really need to spell out the obvious?

NK was not hammered until both stumps gave the okay.

If either stump had chosen commuter, the claim would have been believed unless countered.

Also, nobody countered commuter before both stumps game the green light.

There. Is. No. Town. Commuter.
Did you not read my post about Labrynth? My role pm was loud town jk. I was never informed of an enabler until he got misvigged and my jk therefore failed.
Did you not read where that is irrelevant?

You knew you were a JK, right?

A town commuter would have known they were, in fact, a town commuter.

A stump would have known that they did, in fact, choose commuter.

In no world ever would NK not have been countered if any kind of town commuter actually existed, and the stumps never would have authorized the hammer if they had submitted any kind of role that contained the word "commuter" In it.
Am I misunderstanding the setup then? Why would there be an informed scum commuter enabler in the game if there were none? *confuzzled*

Posted: Thu Jun 17, 2021 4:22 pm
by House
Like, notice ALL the buddying vanished since my push.

I guess I'm not worth being their friend, anymore.

Also Gamma, does scum buddy each other as hard as Moon was buddying me on d1? I was low-key sus even then.
In post 1767, House wrote:
In post 1751, Moongrass wrote:Mic drop.
One thing's for sure... we're not red-aligned.

Image

No scum team would ever be
this
blatant.

Image

Posted: Thu Jun 17, 2021 4:27 pm
by House
In post 2670, Mia and Maya Fey wrote:
In post 2668, House wrote:
In post 2666, Mia and Maya Fey wrote:
In post 2657, House wrote:
In post 2654, Mia and Maya Fey wrote:
In post 2629, House wrote:
In post 2626, Mia and Maya Fey wrote:
In post 2595, House wrote:
In post 2081, Jingle wrote:
Vote Count 1.FINAL
Not Known 15 (7):
, , , , , , ,
Moongrass (1):
,
Free Money Free Tea (1):
,
Mia and Maya Fey (1):
,
Titus (1):
,
nomnomnom (0):

jjh927 (0):

House (0):

cyrus62 (0):

mastina (0):

Not_Mafia (0):

Gamma Emerald (0):

DrippingGoofball (0):


No Euphemization (0):


Not Voting (2):
, ,

With 13 alive, it takes
7
to euphemize and
7
to have no euphemization.

The deadline for Day 1 is in (expired on 2021-06-17 17:00:00). At Deadline, currently No Euphemization will occur.


A Hammer has been achieved!


Not Known 15 has been made into a Euphemism Day 1.

He was:

Spoiler:
Mafia Informed Commuter Enabler

Informed Commuter EnablerYou are aware that [Redacted]. If you die, any commuters will be unable to commute.
I think my PoE pool is pretty accurate, and there is likely 1 scum on and 1 scum off the wagon.

I also believe the commuter enabler did not activate a town commuter, or one of the stumps would have vetoed the hammer as the claim was for commuter.

Scum most likely did not bus until the lim became inevitable.
Are you trolling me now? I was jk in Labrynth and when jk enabler got vigged, I became vt. :shifty:
And no, there was nothng in my role pm about an enabler.
It doesn't matter what the commuter potentially knows/knew.

It matters that the stumps did not select commuter as a town power role.

I'm leaning towards yes as an answer to your question.
How could you possibly have any idea who or what the stumps chose?
Do I really need to spell out the obvious?

NK was not hammered until both stumps gave the okay.

If either stump had chosen commuter, the claim would have been believed unless countered.

Also, nobody countered commuter before both stumps game the green light.

There. Is. No. Town. Commuter.
Did you not read my post about Labrynth? My role pm was loud town jk. I was never informed of an enabler until he got misvigged and my jk therefore failed.
Did you not read where that is irrelevant?

You knew you were a JK, right?

A town commuter would have known they were, in fact, a town commuter.

A stump would have known that they did, in fact, choose commuter.

In no world ever would NK not have been countered if any kind of town commuter actually existed, and the stumps never would have authorized the hammer if they had submitted any kind of role that contained the word "commuter" In it.
Am I misunderstanding the setup then? Why would there be an informed scum commuter enabler in the game if there were none? *confuzzled*
Let's assume for a second that you rolled commuter. That's all you knew about your role, just that you're a commuter.

NK claims commuter.

In what world do you not counter?

Let's assume for a second that you're a tree stump that submitted the role [Any Modifier] Commuter.

NK simply claims "commuter".

In what world do you as a tree stump allow NK to be hammered?

It doesn't happen.

Posted: Thu Jun 17, 2021 4:27 pm
by Mia and Maya Fey
In post 2669, House wrote:I think it's just Moon & jjh.
I thought that D1 because I thought jjh was really scummy but I don’t know anymore. Is moon scum or just tstbs?
But Titus who correctly tr her in GS gives me confidence it is probably moon. Moon is pushing everyone who isn’t confitown as my buddy or at least she was.

Posted: Thu Jun 17, 2021 4:30 pm
by Mia and Maya Fey
In post 2672, House wrote:
In post 2670, Mia and Maya Fey wrote:
In post 2668, House wrote:
In post 2666, Mia and Maya Fey wrote:
In post 2657, House wrote:
In post 2654, Mia and Maya Fey wrote:
In post 2629, House wrote:
In post 2626, Mia and Maya Fey wrote:
In post 2595, House wrote:
In post 2081, Jingle wrote:
Vote Count 1.FINAL
Not Known 15 (7):
, , , , , , ,
Moongrass (1):
,
Free Money Free Tea (1):
,
Mia and Maya Fey (1):
,
Titus (1):
,
nomnomnom (0):

jjh927 (0):

House (0):

cyrus62 (0):

mastina (0):

Not_Mafia (0):

Gamma Emerald (0):

DrippingGoofball (0):


No Euphemization (0):


Not Voting (2):
, ,

With 13 alive, it takes
7
to euphemize and
7
to have no euphemization.

The deadline for Day 1 is in (expired on 2021-06-17 17:00:00). At Deadline, currently No Euphemization will occur.


A Hammer has been achieved!


Not Known 15 has been made into a Euphemism Day 1.

He was:

Spoiler:
Mafia Informed Commuter Enabler

Informed Commuter EnablerYou are aware that [Redacted]. If you die, any commuters will be unable to commute.
I think my PoE pool is pretty accurate, and there is likely 1 scum on and 1 scum off the wagon.

I also believe the commuter enabler did not activate a town commuter, or one of the stumps would have vetoed the hammer as the claim was for commuter.

Scum most likely did not bus until the lim became inevitable.
Are you trolling me now? I was jk in Labrynth and when jk enabler got vigged, I became vt. :shifty:
And no, there was nothng in my role pm about an enabler.
It doesn't matter what the commuter potentially knows/knew.

It matters that the stumps did not select commuter as a town power role.

I'm leaning towards yes as an answer to your question.
How could you possibly have any idea who or what the stumps chose?
Do I really need to spell out the obvious?

NK was not hammered until both stumps gave the okay.

If either stump had chosen commuter, the claim would have been believed unless countered.

Also, nobody countered commuter before both stumps game the green light.

There. Is. No. Town. Commuter.
Did you not read my post about Labrynth? My role pm was loud town jk. I was never informed of an enabler until he got misvigged and my jk therefore failed.
Did you not read where that is irrelevant?

You knew you were a JK, right?

A town commuter would have known they were, in fact, a town commuter.

A stump would have known that they did, in fact, choose commuter.

In no world ever would NK not have been countered if any kind of town commuter actually existed, and the stumps never would have authorized the hammer if they had submitted any kind of role that contained the word "commuter" In it.
Am I misunderstanding the setup then? Why would there be an informed scum commuter enabler in the game if there were none? *confuzzled*
Let's assume for a second that you rolled commuter. That's all you knew about your role, just that you're a commuter.

NK claims commuter.

In what world do you not counter?

Let's assume for a second that you're a tree stump that submitted the role [Any Modifier] Commuter.

NK simply claims "commuter".

In what world do you as a tree stump allow NK to be hammered?

It doesn't happen.
Because this is a 2 town stumps game. If I’m town commuter, why would I CC NK when he was extremely likely to be yeeted? I would only CC if that wasn’t the case.