Posted: Wed Nov 03, 2021 4:57 am
In a 9 - 4 setup, town need to eliminate 4 scum before eliminating three townies. A one for one trade is 100% worth it to scum in this setup.
bold of you to assume someone like wiki would ever listen to what his scumpartners are telling him, but also why wouldn't they let him act like this? it was getting him consistently townread on day 1.In post 2622, Salsabil Faria wrote:In post 2621, Datisi wrote:you too
wiki has spent the whole first day screaming how he's a strong power role and how we cannot vote him out, but now he's self voting? okay
also big fucking lol @ claiming he's town for shitspamming all over the gameI know what he did, but still not sure if his scum partners let him play like this. Yeah, one thing can happen, he is a traitor and his playstyle was signaling the scums and that's why he is still alive ever after claimingimportantTPR in D1. I'm considering this scenario, but not interested in closing the D2 early.
Andresnk indicates towards scum!T3but scum can use this for another miselimination tactic. Need to readAndres's ISO...
where? he's claimed to be an ~important power role~ multiple times in day one, and it's apparently not a jailkeeper.In post 2641, Enchant wrote:Wiki claimed "Townie" already and admitted lying.
the logic of scum faking a counterclaim against a pr, knowing they are gonna get heat for it the next day is that the scum in question won't die right there, instead they'll survive for an extra day, *and* they'll vote out a power role instead of themIn post 2649, geraintm wrote:the logic of scum faking a counterclaim against a PR, just in an attempt to push it through, knowing they are going to get heat for it the next day
there's 4 scum confirmed - trading 1 scum for a confirmed town power role is an excellent tradeIn post 2649, geraintm wrote:the logic of scum faking a counterclaim against a PR, just in an attempt to push it through, knowing they are going to get heat for it the next day - i just don't buy.
you see his play as strongly scummy.
i see it the opposite.
we are allowed to differ on this.
well yeah, thisIn post 2650, Dwlee99 wrote:In a 9 - 4 setup, town need to eliminate 4 scum before eliminating three townies. A one for one trade is 100% worth it to scum in this setup.
In post 1, ChaosOmega wrote:Setup Information:
All players with access to a PT may talk in the PT at any time.
There are confirmed to be four players aligned with the mafia.[/b]
In post 2651, Datisi wrote:where? he's claimed to be an ~important power role~ multiple times in day one, and it's apparently not a jailkeeper.In post 2641, Enchant wrote:Wiki claimed "Townie" already and admitted lying.
also, do you have thoughts on wiki's yeet? his alignment? anyone else in the game?
In post 2562, Enchant wrote:Wait did Wiki claim Jailkeeped killed original and then reclaimed townie?
In post 2566, Wiki wrote:yeah that was badIn post 2562, Enchant wrote:Wait did Wiki claim Jailkeeped killed original and then reclaimed townie?
but he put us in situation where i should be elimed instead of him, i was thinking he is fakeclaiming.
he claimed vt before that, he wasn't careful for pr, he tried to elim me (his town lean) instead of himself on e-2, than he claimed on e-1
LolIn post 2654, Enchant wrote:I don't want to be accused of being "Dumbtelling" but where the hell 4 mafia intel comed from?
In post 2656, Datisi wrote:not to dumbtell or anything, but what is a mafia
?In post 2662, Salsabil Faria wrote:Ok fineeeeeee
UNVOTE: Datisi
VOTE: Wiki
No iso-diving happened...
Was you town?In post 2669, Wiki wrote:We will lose, dont suffer, play it fast. Nobody listens to anybody
To not let you do that, bruh.In post 2672, Dwlee99 wrote:why the fuck are you quickhammering
I DONT EVEN MAKE LONG POSTS
READ THEM