Mafiascum.net

((My last post was in response to mastin's.))

Andy, you bug me so.
Why smalltext? Whyyyy?
I mean, I can copy/paste to read it, but, 'cmoooon.


-V

Didn't realize it was that small. I don't go smaller than 30. :/
I'll stop though since it inconveniences you.

<3

Andy, I wanna buy you a drink after this is all over.

In post 2668, BROseidon wrote:I'M SORRY THAT YOU FIND ME DUMB FOR CONSIDERING POSSIBILITIES AND PLAYING AROUND WITH THE IDEA THAT YOU'RE SCUM /sarcasm

I'm sorry you're trying to point at a bicycle and call it a 16-wheeler. Your narrative of what happened

I mean, instead of rebuking my argument for why your narrative is wrong, you come in and /sarcasmtag. That should tell you something.

In post 2653, BeautyAndTheBeast wrote:If I was trying to derail the Rach lynch I would have unvoted. I wasn't willing to move my vote until support TO LYNCH NICK was UNQUESTIONABLY PRESENT.
Aka I was deliberately trying NOT to derail the Rach wagon until I KNEW Nick's lynch would go through.

You mean this self-meta-ey WIFOM?

You could have been unwilling to unvote in case the lynch went through, and therefore the unvote would have looked bad.

Back to you

Andrius you have to talk in caps so we can see you as town

Hey NS.

Be useful.

I am

he is

In post 2684, 50 Shades of Purple wrote:he is

that was me. sorry

In post 2595, nickthename wrote:Also happy birthday bork.

Happy birthday!

In post 2678, Faster Than Light wrote:<3

Andy, I wanna buy you a drink after this is all over.

Done deal.

In post 2681, notscience wrote:Andrius you have to talk in caps so we can see you as town

I already have?

In post 2686, borkjerfkin wrote:

Thanks! my wife got me this:

Daaaaamn dude. Have a good night. ;D

In post 2551, Mutleyddmc wrote:

In post 2493, Andrius wrote:

In post 2491, TiphaineDeath wrote:Can someone help me figure out what the rational behind a saki kill is, it bugs me.

vig kill obv.

I killed him cos he is a little shit

I couldn't have done it better myself if you gave me the fucking gun. Welcome to the town bloc.

Mastin, anyone who claims that as a Vig shot without counterclaim is roughly 95% Town.

Andrius, lynching Mastin will make me very angry. Do you want to see me very angry?

So...anyone else thinking that Mala's last post about giving us all a free pass because we p-lynched scum seemed very insincere? I mean, come fucking on---I know bottom feeding, but the Rach wagon wasn't it, particularly since she blatantly tried to redirect onto Mutley when her wagon started.

Also, TF, Nick failed your reaction test.



Also happy birthday, Bork.

Ghostlin wrote:Andrius, lynching Mastin will make me very angry. Do you want to see me very angry?

No. ;_;
Gonna do this for a bit and see how it goes.

More caps please

Who the hell

It's probably one of mollie's alts.

In [url=http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopic.php?p=5268622#p5268622]post 2692[/url], gr3yCat wrote:Well whateverz.

Oh fuck me.

No, mine.

I'm a winner at a losing game.

._.

BORK DELETE THAT PLS.

l0l0l0l0l

In post 2680, BROseidon wrote:You mean this self-meta-ey WIFOM?

You could have been unwilling to unvote in case the lynch went through, and therefore the unvote would have looked bad.

... There's nothing self-meta-ey about it. I was unwilling to move the vote on Rach unless the lynch on my all-day-long scumread of Nick was unquestionably supported to go through.

You can try to twist it all you want, but you have no argument here.

In post 2696, BeautyAndTheBeast wrote:... There's nothing self-meta-ey about it. I was unwilling to move the vote on Rach unless the lynch on my all-day-long scumread of Nick was unquestionably supported to go through.

You still tried to get Nick lynched over Rach.

That is still an attempted derail.

Just because you didn't go all-out trying to derail doesn't change the fact that SAYING WE SHOULD FLASH-WAGON NICK IS STILL A POSITION THAT DERAILS THE RACH LYNCH.

In post 2697, BROseidon wrote:

In post 2696, BeautyAndTheBeast wrote:... There's nothing self-meta-ey about it. I was unwilling to move the vote on Rach unless the lynch on my all-day-long scumread of Nick was unquestionably supported to go through.

You still tried to get Nick lynched over Rach.

That is still an attempted derail.

Just because you didn't go all-out trying to derail doesn't change the fact that SAYING WE SHOULD FLASH-WAGON NICK IS STILL A POSITION THAT DERAILS THE RACH LYNCH.

... You realize the idea was floated originally by conftown, right?

Just sayin'.

WOOOOO NOMINATIONS

I BLEW MY LOAD ALL OVER SAKI