Page 108 of 266

Posted: Mon Oct 21, 2013 5:27 pm
by Tierce
Syr, dear, it's okay. Everyone but me draws scum sometimes. It's obvious it's you, and it's obvious it's your scum game. What is this "content" thing, after all!

Posted: Mon Oct 21, 2013 5:28 pm
by Tierce
Hey kanye. Where's that theory that The Alchemist was very obviously not Syryana?

Posted: Mon Oct 21, 2013 5:31 pm
by The Alchemist
I'm afraid I'll be the one laughing in the postgame, dear.

Posted: Mon Oct 21, 2013 5:36 pm
by kanyeknowsbest
In post 2485, kanyeknowsbest wrote:http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... er_sort=Go

http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... er_sort=Go

syryana was engaged in the game and active. the alchemist is not. if you believe they are the same person how do you rationalize this radical shift in behavior?
this 1 tierce? if theyre the same person theyre either trying 2 hide it by not posting any content whatsoever or they had an alignment change theyre super unhappy w. and i dont recall this being a bastard game.

that said idk nething abt sryrana or theyre Posting Stryle or w.e. nor do i rly care.

Posted: Mon Oct 21, 2013 5:42 pm
by Tierce
In post 2678, kanyeknowsbest wrote:
In post 2485, kanyeknowsbest wrote:http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... er_sort=Go

http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... er_sort=Go

syryana was engaged in the game and active. the alchemist is not. if you believe they are the same person how do you rationalize this radical shift in behavior?
this 1 tierce? if theyre the same person theyre either trying 2 hide it by not posting any content whatsoever or they had an alignment change theyre super unhappy w. and i dont recall this being a bastard game.

that said idk nething abt sryrana or theyre Posting Stryle or w.e. nor do i rly care.
I don't believe an alignment change was necessary. The flavor behind this is pretty obvious--Jaqen H'ghar disappears after a certain point in the books, and when he appears again he is a different person. There might have been a change, but it's not necessary.

Plus any ASoIaF game is bastard by definition.


I do know his posting style, and I do care. quadz and Garruk care too. Even Benmage, I guess~ Care to join us and make something beautiful?

Posted: Mon Oct 21, 2013 5:44 pm
by kanyeknowsbest
i do care about why alchemist potentially beind sryrana all along (the audience gasps) lends credence 2 him being scum tho

Posted: Mon Oct 21, 2013 5:45 pm
by The Alchemist
In post 2680, kanyeknowsbest wrote:(the audience gasps)
Just Empire gasping, most likely.

Posted: Mon Oct 21, 2013 5:49 pm
by Tierce
In post 2680, kanyeknowsbest wrote:i do care about why alchemist potentially beind sryrana all along (the audience gasps) lends credence 2 him being scum tho
Because he's using this as a mask to provide absolutely no content, and because there are several people here who are capable of reading Syryana (or at least I'd assume so, but then again, see Nacho being oblivious), which means that Syr-scum needs to dodge them as much as possible. Which better way than to pretend to be someone else who is cryptic by nature and just try to prod dodge as long as possible? Three prod dodges in a row--there's no way that's coming from Syryana-Town who has several sounding boards in this game.

Posted: Mon Oct 21, 2013 5:51 pm
by Tammy
Syry's just trolling you now.

My marriage turned us into lovers and he had a way to void the marriage by disappearing and coming back as the alchemist, so we got divorced. But yes, Syry is the Alchemist.

His lurking is annoying, but I still believe that he's town from his the posting in the neighborhood.

Posted: Mon Oct 21, 2013 5:51 pm
by The Alchemist
In post 2682, Tierce wrote:Three prod dodges in a row--there's no way that's coming from Syryana-Town who has several sounding boards in this game.
You really haven't read any recent Syryana games, have you?

Posted: Mon Oct 21, 2013 5:54 pm
by Eddard Stark
Day 3, Vc 17
SpyreX (6) -
Tammy, ooba, Zdenek, elleheathen, Messiah Complex, Nautilius
AGar (3) -
Goat on a Raft, The Alchemist, Alfred Borden
Zdenek (5) -
kanyeknowsbest, StupendousMan, Shadoweh, SpyreX, AGar
elleheathen (1) -
Goat on a Raft
Benmage (1) -
PrideandJoy
The Alchemist (4) -
Tierce, quadz08, Benmage, Garruk Relentless

Not voting (2)
:Cephrir, SafetyDance

With 21 alive it takes 11 votes to lynch
  • Deadline Date: 25th of October at 16:05 EDT
  • Deadline Countdown: (expired on 2013-10-25 04:30:01)
  • I am V/la! Expect me once a Day to do VC's and prods and that type of stuff though.

Posted: Mon Oct 21, 2013 5:55 pm
by Tierce
In post 2684, The Alchemist wrote:
In post 2682, Tierce wrote:Three prod dodges in a row--there's no way that's coming from Syryana-Town who has several sounding boards in this game.
You really haven't read any recent Syryana games, have you?
I couldn't care less that you're on vacation. Either contribute or die.

Posted: Mon Oct 21, 2013 5:56 pm
by The Alchemist
In post 2686, Tierce wrote:
In post 2684, The Alchemist wrote:
In post 2682, Tierce wrote:Three prod dodges in a row--there's no way that's coming from Syryana-Town who has several sounding boards in this game.
You really haven't read any recent Syryana games, have you?
I couldn't care less that you're on vacation. Either contribute or die.
I have been contributing. You dipshits refuse to lynch AGar.

Posted: Mon Oct 21, 2013 5:57 pm
by Tierce
Oh, please. That is a hell of a push on AGar, truly impressive.

Tammy--why would you pick a Townread to Loverize? O.o Wouldn't a not-really-lynchable scumread make a hell of a lot more sense?

Posted: Mon Oct 21, 2013 5:57 pm
by kanyeknowsbest
why the complete dropoff in the activity d2+ then? if sryryana were scum d1 i dont see how he couldnt have continued to ride his momentum and be doing just fine still, considering he was a pretty popular townread by many.

Posted: Mon Oct 21, 2013 5:59 pm
by The Alchemist
In post 2688, Tierce wrote:Oh, please. That is a hell of a push on AGar, truly impressive.
Considering you've come out of hiding purely to mislynch two, almost three townies now, you're running a great track record yourself.

Posted: Mon Oct 21, 2013 6:04 pm
by Tierce
In post 2690, The Alchemist wrote:
In post 2688, Tierce wrote:Oh, please. That is a hell of a push on AGar, truly impressive.
Considering you've come out of hiding purely to mislynch two, almost three townies now, you're running a great track record yourself.
Conviction about what I'm doing is not and will never be a scumtell. But refusing to provide content and then complaining that others are not lynching the scumread you've barely pushed, that is scummy as hell. But sure, keep throwing potshots without any point to them.

kanye: Syr's been busy and his scum game tends to suffer on those occasions--having to fool people who know him, etc. It peters out.

Posted: Mon Oct 21, 2013 6:06 pm
by Cephrir
I'd just like to confirm for anyone wondering, yes, the rules do say there are no jesters.

Posted: Mon Oct 21, 2013 6:23 pm
by Tierce
In post 2691, Tierce wrote:
In post 2690, The Alchemist wrote:
In post 2688, Tierce wrote:Oh, please. That is a hell of a push on AGar, truly impressive.
Considering you've come out of hiding purely to mislynch two, almost three townies now, you're running a great track record yourself.
Conviction about what I'm doing is not and will never be a scumtell. But refusing to provide content and then complaining that others are not lynching the scumread you've barely pushed, that is scummy as hell. But sure, keep throwing potshots without any point to them.
Fun fact: I wasn't even in the Amrun wagon, and I repeatedly said her behavior was null.
Do
keep going.

Posted: Mon Oct 21, 2013 6:41 pm
by Messiah Complex
Unvote

Vote: Alchemist


You've prod dodged your way through the past few days, or simply acknowledged that you'd been prodded. There has been plenty going on that you could comment on, but instead you choose to push an empty lynch on Agar. You have the ability to shed some light on what is going on with you but instead are just dumbfounded that anyone could be finding you scummy right now. Do you have anything legitimate to add or are you going yo continue with this shoddy play style?

Posted: Mon Oct 21, 2013 7:08 pm
by SpyreX
I can happily listen to your towncases when I have a halfie about you being scum. I'm one of those crazy people who will sometimes listen to people even when 100% convinced they are scum, especially when that person is SpyreX!
Well, fine. Please lord don't make this end up wasted words.

Even if you want to disregard the statement at start (which is still pretty town and I dont see the scum4cred angle).

The other components early that I liked was the stance on thor and safetydance AND stupendousman. That doesn't look like scum manuvering with the wolves, that reads honest through and through (and without hesitation on the SM vote which is the right move there).

While I dont agree, I at least understand the back and forth with Thor landing on that switch to SD. I like the vote for elle out of the gate.

Moreso, and this is that gut. Its the feel. He's addressing concerns without letting it break his stride (something I can't even do) in that very natural ebb and flow way. Its not the mechanical collection, but the more confident? stride that I haven't seen many scum be able to emulate.

A good difference is look at Zdenek's every response. Its trying to have that stride but its so fake and bipolar its closer to falling on its own face.

---

Of course if The Alchemist = Syr I'd be alllllll for that too.

Posted: Mon Oct 21, 2013 7:35 pm
by kanyeknowsbest
who are u talking about in the first part of that post spyrex.

Posted: Mon Oct 21, 2013 9:38 pm
by Goat on a Raft
In post 2652, Nautilius wrote:you're scum as fuck =]
mollie was completely right about you!
When and why did you change your mind on us? Why does the gif solidify it?

Posted: Mon Oct 21, 2013 9:39 pm
by Goat on a Raft
UNVOTE: Agar
VOTE: The Alchemist

Posted: Mon Oct 21, 2013 9:39 pm
by Goat on a Raft
Obligatory 'we still think Agar is scum but, of our two current votes, the one we are moving to wants Agar dead more so let's be petty' disclaimer