Posted: Mon Apr 29, 2019 4:40 pm
i don't have to make the game me vs mbaki now but if my coalition doesn't win the game we're probably going to have to fight!
VOTE: Dance
yeah looking again we get a shit ton of info from this.
And do you really think I was heard? Dance is just handing scum the keys here. VCA is impossible on Dance. Looking back on votes is impossible. Forming teamwork is impossible. Accountability is impossible. Dance is garbage.In post 2671, OkaPoka wrote:mbaki is not going to be lynched
the people who are agreeing with rc are not doing it because they sheep rc, everyone has come to their own independent conclusion on why dance is superior. this means if rc decides to make the game him vs mbaki, he won't have the same base of support
what if we literally just ignore all these things and see it as an opportunity to get rid of 2 players who weren't getting townblockedAnd do you really think I was heard? Dance is just handing scum the keys here. VCA is impossible on Dance. Looking back on votes is impossible. Forming teamwork is impossible. Accountability is impossible. Dance is garbage.
*pulls hair out*
In post 2580, Titus wrote:@Taly
If we veto the lurkers and wagoned slots from yesterday, we figure out a lot about what happened day 1. That also puts us in a great spot for narrowing coalitions as scum must kill scummy people and lhf.
In dance, scum can obscure them entirely. It also leaves little data for later.
so?In post 2634, OkaPoka wrote:if we double hit scum we cant veto because there is one scum left
1) It's the LHF scum want dead, not the VCA useful ones at best.In post 2684, RadiantCowbells wrote:That doesn't factor in
1) that we can still kill relatively LHF no matter how the teams are set up
2) the way that teams are paired is absolutely data for later
3) the opportunity cost of vetoing before coalition
it's an extremely narrow look at the problem.
nvm thenIn post 2692, OkaPoka wrote:Let me summarize the interaction:
TMCK asked whether we could or could not use coalition after hitting scum in a dance.
I responded, as clearly as possible, no, because that would violate one of the prerequisites of coalitioning. I went to explain how that would violate the prerequisite of coalitioning. What is the question here, chennis?
In post 2631, themilkcartonkid wrote:No, I think rc is right here. Veto after. Dance, coalition, veto, then we can decide from there. Quick question though. If we dance and hit scum somehow, we cant use coalition, right?
In post 2634, OkaPoka wrote:if we double hit scum we cant veto because there is one scum left
hmmIn post 2634, OkaPoka wrote:if we double hit scum we cant veto because there is one scum left
This can die now.
3) why?In post 2691, Titus wrote:1) It's the LHF scum want dead, not the VCA useful ones at best.In post 2684, RadiantCowbells wrote:That doesn't factor in
1) that we can still kill relatively LHF no matter how the teams are set up
2) the way that teams are paired is absolutely data for later
3) the opportunity cost of vetoing before coalition
it's an extremely narrow look at the problem.
2)Yes but not data we can work with without flips. Many flips.
3) Veto should happen before coalition.