Mafiascum.net

Posted: **Wed Sep 28, 2022 4:47 pm**

In post 2331, Ydrasse wrote:i have a role where i can check to see if people have pts(EXCEPT THE MAFIA PT) and join them if they do

titus doesn’t have any pts

yo target me next

Posted: **Wed Sep 28, 2022 4:48 pm**

i did think originally that titus claiming mastina as her mason buddy was bc they were scum together but the way things played out makes it seem like mastina and titus were not at all on the same page, otherwise they prooobably would have been more coordinated about it

Posted: **Wed Sep 28, 2022 4:48 pm**

In post 2381, Klick wrote:
In post 2318, Titus wrote:I am a masonizer. I am keeping my partner hidden
No you're not

VOTE: Titus

@klick, why did you say this?

You seem to be making a statement that is disconnected from what Ydra was saying

Posted: **Wed Sep 28, 2022 4:57 pm**

In post 2548, mastina wrote:But they had no reason to block me.

I had claimed the reveal would be on D4, not D3.

I was under fairly wide suspicion.

Roden, my HARD push, flipped town.

I had my credibility destroyed by that flip--with people quite suspicious of me.

Why would the scum roleblock me?

They wouldn't.

i mean idk about this because if you are town who had claimed you have scumhunting capabilities i think it's still not worth the risk to not roleblock you

especially with some of the other roles that have flipped, no?

this seems a lil wine

Posted: **Wed Sep 28, 2022 5:24 pm**

So Titus does not say her partner is Mastina by name until AFTER ydra reveals that it was a trick, and she should not actually have a PT, and she is needing to walk her original claim back.

In post 2318, Titus wrote:I am a masonizer. I am keeping my partner hidden but
you might solve it by my posts.

Vivax obviously scum kill to protect Luke. Aausuka vigged by Vivax.

VOTE: Lukewarm

"You might solve it by my posts" does not feel like she is saying "I made it super hella obvious who I am masons with"

My pet theory

is that she was not originally going to claim mastina, because "I claim masons with town player I am not masons with" is not actually a very good strat lol.

My pet theory part 2, electric boogaloo

is that it was originally going to be claimed to be Klick.

Spoiler:

But this is a question for another day.

Editor's note: I hate that imbeded spoilers don't work :/

Posted: **Wed Sep 28, 2022 5:31 pm**

My Pet Theory part 3, the threequel:

I think that the original claim was going to be that it fired night 1 (which is why there is the fumble from I have a Partner, to I might have a partner).

(also, if you go through and do a control+f search for every player's name, looking for comments from day 2, really the only options that cannot be pretty easily discredited are Klick and Mastina)

Posted: **Wed Sep 28, 2022 5:48 pm**

Not Ydrasse cause guilty result

Spoiler: Not SS, Dann, or JJH

Spoiler: Not me or fire

Spoiler: Not Mala

Spoiler: Not andres

Not PenguinPower or Uncrowned because of Lack of Comments, there for lack of "maybe you can figure it out"

Going through this again, I realized that I did not actually check for Furtive. And I guess there is nothing ruling him out in the same way. definitively, and acually some stuff that I could see being it. But he has Titus in his PoE here, so probably the softest remove:

Spoiler: Furtive

So that leaves:
mastina
Klick

Posted: **Wed Sep 28, 2022 6:00 pm**

In post 2677, Lukewarm wrote:
In post 2381, Klick wrote:
In post 2318, Titus wrote:I am a masonizer. I am keeping my partner hidden
No you're not

VOTE: Titus
@klick, why did you say this?

You seem to be making a statement that is disconnected from what Ydra was saying

Correct; I saw 'I am keeping my partner hidden' and the alarm bells in my head went off telling me that was bullshit
Titus wasn't claiming from a position of it being acceptable to withhold information. If she were telling the truth, it needed to be all of it, right away, to avoid exactly what happened: Titus' claim adapting with new information.
I hadn't read Ydrasse's claim at all when I made 2381, it was a reaction to me catching up on the thread in chronological order.

I have two things to say in response to 2679
1. I say more about Titus than you suggest through my reads on the game at large. Titus was in my PoE D2 and left PoE through her actions on D2 (specifically, I thought her drunk solving looked like she was genuinely trying to solve).
2. If I were scum with Titus, I don't think I'd sign off on a plan for the two of us to claim Masons in any capacity. I think I'd be happy with my current position in the game from a 'I could viably endgame' perspective, and I wouldn't want to tie myself to Titus, who is in a considerably worse position than that. Plus thinking long-term, I don't think the concept of 'Titus/Klick!scumbuddies fakeclaiming Masons and being at endgame and surviving together' is something I'd ever believe would work.

Posted: **Wed Sep 28, 2022 6:15 pm**

Hmm.

I was starting from the question of why she would ever claim mastina, saw she didnt at first, then went to "who was she planning to claim?"

But I guess another reasonable answer is that she intended to never say anyone.

So much wasted work x.x

Posted: **Wed Sep 28, 2022 8:41 pm**

In post 2638, mastina wrote:Work phoneposting, but:
1: can't keep up with thread from work, so no further commentary now.

I realized that I rushed some things eg fire claim not acknowledged, but I promise that when I am not 2 hours late for work, I'll be able to talk more about everything.

3: I need to go through the day again and give non-fire-centric thoughts, off of changed information.

For instance, Ydrasse locktownned, jjh locktownned, PP locktownned, and the big one: Lukewarm locktownned, among others.

Another biggie:
Obviously, Klick and Dann aren't scum together.
But both individually are ambivalent to me: having reasons to be town, but also, reasons to be scum. They COULD be TvT, but aren't sVs, and still have a decent chance of having scum.

Klick is potentially scum for some things yet town for others, Dann is potentially scum by play but might have townslipped yet the townslip is fakeable.

So uh.

Gonna need to rain check this one. (I think that's the expression to use? Delay until tomorrow.)

We, uh. We have other things on our mind.

(Quite literal, mind.)
Is something we need to relax from. (Mafia's not relaxing.)

We'll be back to gaming (and hey, maybe some semblance of normal!) tomorrow.

Posted: **Thu Sep 29, 2022 12:18 am**

vote count 3.03

with 14 votes in play, it takes 8 to make a decision. day 3 ends in (expired on 2022-10-12 20:00:00).

firing

Titus [6]:

Malakittens, Andresvmb, Klick, Dannflor, Lukewarm, PenguinPower

Lukewarm [1]:

Titus

fireisredsir [1]:

mastina

not voting [6]:

furtiveglance, Uncrowned, jjh927, Something_Smart, Ydrasse, fireisredsir

mod notes~ this is a mod note.

flavour

now playing...
♫

Magazin - Sve bi seke ljubile mornare

♫
▶ ❚❚ ─────────────────●───────────── 1:43 / 2:54

Posted: **Thu Sep 29, 2022 1:14 am**

give me the hammer it's my turn

Posted: **Thu Sep 29, 2022 1:33 am**

VOTE: titus

go wild

Posted: **Thu Sep 29, 2022 1:34 am**

@fireisredsir I presume you have already done this or perhaps it’s obvious, but can you confirm with the Mod that if you acted on someone that was RB’ed, that you would get a result of No Action that night? I just want to make sure I understand this 1v1 with no ambiguity.

Posted: **Thu Sep 29, 2022 1:34 am**

Posted: **Thu Sep 29, 2022 1:34 am**

I want an answer to my question.

Posted: **Thu Sep 29, 2022 1:35 am**

Just for the record btw, mastina just seems wrong to me. They’re either Town that’s off, or Scum. And I really wouldn’t execute fireisredsir here.

Posted: **Thu Sep 29, 2022 1:35 am**

UNVOTE:

Posted: **Thu Sep 29, 2022 1:36 am**

Titus is going to self-hammer - I just want a quick response.

Posted: **Thu Sep 29, 2022 1:37 am**

Also Ydrasse - it was nice playing with you. I suspect you won’t be around much longer.

Posted: **Thu Sep 29, 2022 1:38 am**

>:( i wanted my speedlim

Posted: **Thu Sep 29, 2022 1:38 am**

and yeah lol probably not

rip me i don’t have reads to share

Posted: **Thu Sep 29, 2022 1:39 am**

In post 2691, Andresvmb wrote:Just for the record btw, mastina just seems wrong to me. They’re either Town that’s off, or Scum. And I really wouldn’t execute fireisredsir here.

i think i agree w this tho

Posted: **Thu Sep 29, 2022 1:40 am**

i don’t know if there’s a way for me to get a guilty anymore sadly it was based in ike

trickery even though titus would’ve went over eventually

i just target uncrowned

Posted: **Thu Sep 29, 2022 1:42 am**

Like mastina drove the Roden wagon from the very start and they were wrong. And it’s fine if they had expressed some doubts because then I could see that one push or the other push was more or less serious so I could rely on the strength of the player. But the large number of assumptions in their push of fireisredsir [no interference on their action, protection sitting on fireisredsir (or Ascetic), and the thoughts on balance] should have produced a nuance approach to the result and explanation. Instead we get someone who is screaming bloody murder. It doesn’t add up, and I wouldn’t rely on it for anything.

Mafiascum.net

Datisi's Café [game over!]