Posted: Thu Nov 24, 2016 8:34 am
Why shouldn't we consider things other than who to lynch today? Only Arc is saying we should lynch Chaos today, we're doing either Nero or RK.
Kinda is.. Any cop that found red being put up as a viable lynch pretty much can be turned on any investigation role finding red :/ Like what if it was a watcher? You could have them take the nk and say they killed X. tracker, I tracked X and they took the kill on Y. Rolecop. I checked them and they are VT. or miller. If we start getting paranodia about our 3 confirmed power roles we will just end up killing ourselves.In post 2699, MortFeld wrote:It's not a conspiracy theory, it's a fact. If Chaos is scum, he would have outed Toto as soon as possible. No other option was viable.In post 2697, Naomi-Tan wrote:You know what fine. if your gonna chaos conspricy theory I'll give you a counter theoryIn post 2691, MortFeld wrote:@Naomi - Chaos didn't out Toto, Arc did. Chaos giving guilty on Toto would always happen regardless of Chaos' alignment. Once scum!Chaos saw that the nightkill failed he'd know that Arc jailed Toto, and would want to claim her alignment first.
Why are you asking this? I was just making a point that Chaos isn't confirmed. You cannot argue that he is.In post 2701, Naomi-Tan wrote:along the same lines. if Arc was so sure that Chaos was red, why would she not jailed them? why target RB?
Chaos didn't out a red. Also, just because we are not lynching Chaos or Arc today, doesn't mean we shouldn't look at Chaos and Arc.In post 2703, Naomi-Tan wrote:What im saying is; while we still have multiple viable lynch targets why look towards the people who outted a red?
In post 2694, ChaosOmega wrote:Alright, there are 9 people in this game:
1 confirmed town (rb)
2 claimed PRs (Arc, Chaos)
6 others
Of the 6 others, we lynch one today, investigate one tonight, and jail one tonight. 3 others, 7 alive D4. Presumably, Arc is dead at this point. We lynch the 3 others D4, D5, D6, and that's the game. If I am alive D6, I get added to the other pool, but I get another investigation to clear another player. If Arc is kept alive to D6, she clears so many people it's not funny.
If the last scum wants to concede and end this shitshow of a game, I don't blame you.
I'm fine with you confirming Naomi tonight. Confirm one of Naomi/Nero/RK.In post 2706, ArcAngel9 wrote:I am going to ignore discussions with Naomi. this player officially doesn't understand the concept of team play. She is narrow minded and only want to cling on to her style.
No, Arc you are literally confirming townies every night. You are a cop that everyone knows is telling the truth. Your role at this point is way more powerful than his is.In post 2707, ArcAngel9 wrote:Why would scum kill me when you are the ODD COP. It's more dangerous for the scum if they let you live at this point.In post 2694, ChaosOmega wrote:Alright, there are 9 people in this game:
1 confirmed town (rb)
2 claimed PRs (Arc, Chaos)
6 others
Of the 6 others, we lynch one today, investigate one tonight, and jail one tonight. 3 others, 7 alive D4. Presumably, Arc is dead at this point. We lynch the 3 others D4, D5, D6, and that's the game. If I am alive D6, I get added to the other pool, but I get another investigation to clear another player. If Arc is kept alive to D6, she clears so many people it's not funny.
If the last scum wants to concede and end this shitshow of a game, I don't blame you.
Or if you survive the night. This team should lynch you. If not. GG scum.
Scum are in an even worse if you target them because they miss a NK and everyone knows you're telling the truth.In post 2709, ArcAngel9 wrote:I wanted to know Chaos motive when he says i am as good as dead. How does scum know that Chaos won't target them?
I am still stuck thinking that Chaos is playing us all this while. He is a capable player. I see these things happen in mafia scum.
So what your saying is; It is more likely reds would allow one of there own to be killed to get a confirm. rather than getting a no kill result to confirm?In post 2705, MortFeld wrote:Why are you asking this? I was just making a point that Chaos isn't confirmed. You cannot argue that he is.In post 2701, Naomi-Tan wrote:along the same lines. if Arc was so sure that Chaos was red, why would she not jailed them? why target RB?
For Arc to not be confirmed, her mafia team would have to agree to no kill. This is highly abnormal and is actually a conspiracy theory. Saying that Chaos is not confirmed because he would have said Toto is scum regardless of his alignment - that is being rational.
You are not understanding. scum!Chaos was always going to say that Toto was scum. His saying that does not confirm him. Chaos is not confirmed.
I have no paranoia about Arc. If scum agreed to no kill in anticipation of this, kudos. But that didn't happen.
Chaos didn't out a red. Also, just because we are not lynching Chaos or Arc today, doesn't mean we shouldn't look at Chaos and Arc.In post 2703, Naomi-Tan wrote:What im saying is; while we still have multiple viable lynch targets why look towards the people who outted a red?
Pedit: I don't care if what I'm saying is a conspiracy theory or not, I care how plausible it is. It is not true that Chaos is confirmed. scum!Chaos is extremely plausible. It is much less plausible that scum agreed to no kill.
I meant i don't want to jail Naomi. She is not helpful even if we can confirm her as town.In post 2712, ArcAngel9 wrote:I want to Jail Naomi
I didn't think about this. scum!Chaos could have easily returned an inno on someone else, and simultaneously kept Toto alive by saying she must have been the target. So scum!Chaos is based on Chaos gambiting on a hard bus of Toto - a conspiracy theory not worth considering until LYLO.In post 2711, Naomi-Tan wrote:So what your saying is; It is more likely reds would allow one of there own to be killed to get a confirm. rather than getting a no kill result to confirm?In post 2705, MortFeld wrote:Why are you asking this? I was just making a point that Chaos isn't confirmed. You cannot argue that he is.In post 2701, Naomi-Tan wrote:along the same lines. if Arc was so sure that Chaos was red, why would she not jailed them? why target RB?
For Arc to not be confirmed, her mafia team would have to agree to no kill. This is highly abnormal and is actually a conspiracy theory. Saying that Chaos is not confirmed because he would have said Toto is scum regardless of his alignment - that is being rational.
You are not understanding. scum!Chaos was always going to say that Toto was scum. His saying that does not confirm him. Chaos is not confirmed.
I have no paranoia about Arc. If scum agreed to no kill in anticipation of this, kudos. But that didn't happen.
Chaos didn't out a red. Also, just because we are not lynching Chaos or Arc today, doesn't mean we shouldn't look at Chaos and Arc.In post 2703, Naomi-Tan wrote:What im saying is; while we still have multiple viable lynch targets why look towards the people who outted a red?
Pedit: I don't care if what I'm saying is a conspiracy theory or not, I care how plausible it is. It is not true that Chaos is confirmed. scum!Chaos is extremely plausible. It is much less plausible that scum agreed to no kill.
Cause without That Cop positive Toto would just be confirmed as either the target or the killer. So it could been span either way.
there are D5 benefits to that.In post 2715, ArcAngel9 wrote:What's your thoughts on LIZ? Do you see benefits If I could confirm him tonight?
To be fair we have agreed on a lot of things over the course of the game.In post 2721, MortFeld wrote:Hm, Naomi's list and mine pretty much match up. I think that's good?