Page 109 of 233

Posted: Sun Mar 18, 2018 9:24 am
by brassherald
Okay let's just put in the three bans each in whatever order

Posted: Sun Mar 18, 2018 9:31 am
by Joey_
Thats unfun, i already sent the order i stated
1. Ban gold
2. Embargo City States
3. Ban ivory

Posted: Sun Mar 18, 2018 9:56 am
by Shaziro
Anything that gives a boon to every civ is wildly in towns favor atm anyhow. Even one that gave 50/50 town scum books previously is still wildly favorable for town now.

Posted: Sun Mar 18, 2018 9:59 am
by Joey_
The boost could be different for town and scum, we don't know

Posted: Sun Mar 18, 2018 11:16 am
by Shaziro
See my previous post for my thoughts on how the World Congress is designed.

Posted: Sun Mar 18, 2018 11:25 am
by brassherald
FYI my picks are in

Posted: Sun Mar 18, 2018 12:09 pm
by Shaziro
Wish you’d given it more time for discussion, but given that you’re conftown and Joey is a decent townread for me I’m not super concerned.

Posted: Sun Mar 18, 2018 12:25 pm
by Kokichi Oma
Okay picks all in? Now we can move onto a lynch.

Posted: Sun Mar 18, 2018 3:08 pm
by Klazam
VOTE: Ranmaru let's start here.

Posted: Sun Mar 18, 2018 3:25 pm
by Joey_
@KO who would you like to flip beside gamma ?

Posted: Sun Mar 18, 2018 3:27 pm
by Maestro
Image

World Congress

Open Debate on Day 2 (Update 4.0)
Your resolutions for open debate on Day 2 are:


  • [
    Ban Luxury
    ~ Gold]
    - Seen as the symbol of greed itself, Gold is immoral and its worth is best measured in the blood spilled to obtain it. Religious Gold especially must be eliminated or examined, as it is an affront to Gods and Kings to have effigies made from impure or ill-gotten materials. Assign delegates
    supporting or opposing a temporary Ban on Gold
    . This resolution
    may not
    be enacted consecutively.

    [
    Ban Luxury
    ~ Ivory]
    - The Ivory trade has existed for too long as an indication of the very worst ways in which humanity imposes on nature's great balancing act. Gentle giants such as the rhinoceros and the elephant have never been more threatened, and now is the time to take a stand. Assign delegates
    supporting or opposing a temporary Ban on Ivory
    . This resolution
    may not
    be enacted consecutively.

Remember, only the HEAL: and HURT: tags will be counted as valid delegate assignments for resolutions, for "support" and "oppose" respectively. Be sure to specify which resolution you are supporting or opposing when assigning delegates. Players will be notified in-thread if their delegate assignment is invalid for any reason.




Spoiler: Delegates Cast (0)
[0]
HEAL: SUPPORTING
[Ban Luxury ~ Gold]

[0]
HURT: OPPOSING
[Ban Luxury ~ Gold]


[0]
HEAL: SUPPORTING
[Ban Luxury ~ Ivory]

[0]
HURT: OPPOSING
[Ban Luxury ~ Ivory]

Spoiler: Delegates Not Cast (36)
Nero Cain (2), Kiana Kaslana (2),
brassherald
(
4
), BuJaber (2), Kokichi Koma (2), Chara (2), Gamma Emerald (2), Klazam (2), Titus (2), Shaziro (2), ActionDan (2), Joey_ (2), pidgey (2), Jodaxq (2), Almost50 (2), marshy (2), ranmaru (2)

NOTES
:
  • [*]
    brassherald
    was elected Host
    [*]
    Joey_
    was the runner up
    [*]Deadline is in (expired on 2018-03-27 12:00:00)...
    [*]...on Tuesday, 27 March @ 12:00 PM EST

Posted: Sun Mar 18, 2018 3:30 pm
by Kokichi Oma
In post 2709, Joey_ wrote:@KO who would you like to flip beside gamma ?
Marshy I guess

Posted: Sun Mar 18, 2018 3:30 pm
by Joey_
whut, what did you send brass

Posted: Sun Mar 18, 2018 3:31 pm
by Kokichi Oma
Still a good turnout.

Posted: Sun Mar 18, 2018 4:06 pm
by Joey_
HEAL: Ban Ivory
HEAL: Ban Gold

Posted: Sun Mar 18, 2018 4:11 pm
by Titus
Dumb question, if we are testing religion why are we banning the one that mentions religion?

Posted: Sun Mar 18, 2018 4:14 pm
by Gamma Emerald
HEAL: ban ivory
I saw Titus' post and yeah I think we need to think about that gold ban a bit

Posted: Sun Mar 18, 2018 4:16 pm
by marshy
HEAL: ban ivory
HEAL: ban gold

Posted: Sun Mar 18, 2018 4:17 pm
by Gamma Emerald
In post 2717, marshy wrote:HEAL: ban ivory
HEAL: ban gold
There's no way you didn't notice Titus' post, what are you even thinking?

Posted: Sun Mar 18, 2018 4:25 pm
by Joey_
In post 2715, Titus wrote:Dumb question, if we are testing religion why are we banning the one that mentions religion?
tbh i picked it because it hinted at kills, seems more important than to test religion, unsure tho

Posted: Sun Mar 18, 2018 5:01 pm
by Nero Cain
In post 2690, Gamma Emerald wrote:The first point is alright but I don't really see the problem with thinking it's 3of2
3 or 4 man teams seems like it would be more plausible. Suggesting that there are maybe 3 teams seems like an attempt to not hunt a bigger team. For example, we have 2 dead red, in his proposal, we'd be not hunting any other red scum and that doesn't make any sense to me. Or it being a slip is also a possibility. Also, wasn't Varsoon pushing that there are two teams of 3? Why does he ignore that?

Posted: Sun Mar 18, 2018 5:09 pm
by Nero Cain
In post 2710, Maestro wrote:Religious Gold especially must be eliminated or examined, as it is an affront to Gods and Kings to have effigies made from impure or ill-gotten materials.
I mean, it sounds like a good reason to ban it all together, no?

Like, maybe Gold is what gives them their ability and banning it would 'cause their religion spread cease tonight so banning it would atleast tell us what it does, atleast if the former theory is correct.

Posted: Sun Mar 18, 2018 5:14 pm
by Joey_
City States could be traitor ? I would fit the theme and flavor

Posted: Sun Mar 18, 2018 5:15 pm
by Joey_
It*
Was thinking about 4 man teams too but seems too much, 2x3 with a traitor and a SK or something seems fine tho

Posted: Sun Mar 18, 2018 5:21 pm
by Nero Cain
HEAL: ban ivory
HEAL: ban gold