Mafiascum.net

In post 2699, RadiantCowbells wrote:

In post 2691, Titus wrote:

In post 2684, RadiantCowbells wrote:That doesn't factor in

1) that we can still kill relatively LHF no matter how the teams are set up
2) the way that teams are paired is absolutely data for later
3) the opportunity cost of vetoing before coalition

it's an extremely narrow look at the problem.

1) It's the LHF scum want dead, not the VCA useful ones at best.
2)Yes but not data we can work with without flips. Many flips.
3) Veto should happen before coalition.

3) why?
2) not true at all.
1) /shrug i don't agree that scum are going to choose their pools to deprive YOU of your vca.

1) Any competent VCA can eyeball which slots to pick in a narrow pool. It's usually just the biggest wagons and spots for momentum. The analysis of that data is my skill.
2) Agree to disagree.
3) Veto removes the low hanging fruit useful to town and gives VCA data to nail a smaller coalition.

do you understand the argument

that if coalition is going to win the game that this was an easy game anyway

and it's better to play for after the coalition?

1) Any competent VCA can eyeball which slots to pick in a narrow pool. It's usually just the biggest wagons and spots for momentum. The analysis of that data is my skill.

almost every player on MS thinks that VCA is useless.

2) Agree to disagree.

ok.

3) Veto removes the low hanging fruit useful to town and gives VCA data to nail a smaller coalition.

any 2 players who weren't going to be in the coalition being removed from the game reduces the coalition size.
veto does in fact give us better odds of winning at coalition: but if we miss coalition and have already burned veto our odds of winning are significantly worse.

and again, if not vetoing was the reason we failed the coalition, we're going to win the game regardless of that coalition failure.

Vote Count 2.1.4

Dance (5): RadiantCowbells, themilkcartonkid, chennisden, OkaPoka, 0verki11
Coalition (1): NanceFloor
1of4 (1): Time Devil
Call a friend (1): Ankamius
Veto (1): Titus

Not Voting (7): mbaki, Creature, JohnnyEnglish, Clemency, Chemist1422, BrightEyedFish, Taly

With 16 players alive, it takes 9 to select a power.

The deadline for choosing a power is 8 May 11:15pm UTC-4, or in (expired on 2019-05-08 23:15:00)

RC, just because you hate VCA doesn't make it useless. Also, the absurd argument that everyone hates VCA because you do is just demeaning.

We use 1 of 4 if coalition fails. We'll be in a great and better position because the chaff is gone before coalition.

using 1 of 4 right after coalition fails is possibly the worst time to use it

In post 2705, RadiantCowbells wrote:using 1 of 4 right after coalition fails is possibly the worst time to use it

RC, let's talk reads or not at all. I don't think you value my methods, as such the analysis will just be different. You want what you want and want it now. I play a longer game.

Let's agree to disagree. You drown me out anyway.

I'm the one playing the long game here lol

No, you'd be calmer and not insulting or saying my way or we lose. Those are playing the short game.

Anyway, reads talk?

I'll start. Bef, Chennis, Johnny and Clemency, what do you think of their alignments?

leantown, town, shrug, shrug

Chennis makes me want to throttle game him when he posts. Why are you so high on him being town?

Bef I get. I want him lurker and info flipped. He may have been 8ball.

Johnny and Clemency really ping as lurker scum to me. Have you tried to sort them at all?

he feels like he's posting real time reactions to the thread in a way that i don't think that he would be able to as scum.
he was transparently scum in 1917.

flipping BEF town does not confirm or deny whether he was the eight-ball: it would be much more useful to flip the people leading his wagon.

scum almost never self vote without a buddy on the wagon, ftr.

i should actually not continue to give scum info on dance pairings.

In post 2712, RadiantCowbells wrote:he feels like he's posting real time reactions to the thread in a way that i don't think that he would be able to as scum.
he was transparently scum in 1917.

I haven't seen that since I got here. I see a lurker egging you on. I'll watch for this to check myself.

In post 2715, RadiantCowbells wrote:i should actually not continue to give scum info on dance pairings.

An idiot could do objective dance pairings for scum. That sailed.

oh

actually

yeah

idk

i'll just stop posting.

In post 2713, RadiantCowbells wrote:flipping BEF town does not confirm or deny whether he was the eight-ball: it would be much more useful to flip the people leading his wagon.

Flipping BEF confirms his alignment and thus player motivations at that point. Same with chennis. All 3 flipped when I called for the flash wagon would be golden.

i might have bad reads rn

are we considering veto?

veto really is throwing.

my mechanics aren't wrong, ever.