Page 109 of 175
Posted: Fri Nov 27, 2020 3:11 pm
by Gamma Emerald
In post 2686, Glitch wrote:lmao what even is this game
Either Guillo was a bumbling idiot or there is a redirector in the game, and Guillo tracked Nero but his track was redirected onto scum but he wasn't told this. Those are the only two possibilities I can come up with. WHY would Guillo fake the red check??
Redirector isn't normal. Guillo is just an arrogant sack of shit.
Posted: Fri Nov 27, 2020 3:12 pm
by Albert B. Rampage
In post 2698, Gamma Emerald wrote:
Yeah I have to agree, assuming it WAS the scumkill. Unless scum had it in their head Nero fakeclaimed VT as a PR, scum had to feel pretty damn pressured by Nero, probably pointing to his suspect pool.
Gamma why am I getting a bad feeling from you? You were way more antagonistic to flipped town players than you are to me.
Posted: Fri Nov 27, 2020 3:13 pm
by Gamma Emerald
Posted: Fri Nov 27, 2020 4:01 pm
by DrippingGoofball
I'm not impressed with myself either, what are we gonna do?
Posted: Fri Nov 27, 2020 4:10 pm
by Gamma Emerald
maybe you could reread?
Posted: Fri Nov 27, 2020 7:35 pm
by muh316
VOTE: Non lmh
This slot has been avoiding the conversation for a long time and has managed to dodge replacement.
Posted: Fri Nov 27, 2020 10:01 pm
by Gamma Emerald
In post 595, Nero Cain wrote:JacksonVirgo-was suspicious of this slot b/c I kept seeing them on but wasn't posting. I didn't like his catchup.
muh316-felt early gul vote was go with the flow and scummy. thought his reaction and justification for this reaction was scummy
Tayl0r Swift-using WIFOM, disconnect from the thread
Albert B. Rampage-yucky intro and vote on an inactive slot, TL did nothing but complain.
innocentvillager-"look at me im doing things" not scumhunting. stopped being active.
ulmat-i just didn't like his Glitch vote. I don't think Glitch was fishing as he claimed.
tpg-look @ that ISO
this was p much Nero's D1 scumpool
I'll refrain from making a call on anyhting here until reviewing it alongside potential changed pools
Posted: Fri Nov 27, 2020 10:17 pm
by Gamma Emerald
Posted: Fri Nov 27, 2020 10:20 pm
by Gamma Emerald
I think we should vote DGB, IV, glitch, or muh out today
Posted: Sat Nov 28, 2020 12:47 am
by Glitch
In post 2705, muh316 wrote:VOTE: Non lmh
This slot has been avoiding the conversation for a long time and has managed to dodge replacement.
This is the laziest take I think yoh could possibly make. Do you have reasons for your vote being placed on lmh other than the fact that they're low activity? Is that all you've got on page 483920166402?
Posted: Sat Nov 28, 2020 2:52 am
by May
don't know about that muh guy but i have a person pushing someone who is dead null after 109 pages
i will vote for that person
VOTE: muh
Posted: Sat Nov 28, 2020 2:54 am
by May
i think DGB has been fairly towny
she has this towntell where she's supremely confident and has a "you're wrong and i'm obviously correct" tone to her
believe it or not, she's more reasonable and less commanding as scum
Posted: Sat Nov 28, 2020 4:31 am
by muh316
In post 2710, May wrote:don't know about that muh guy but i have a person pushing someone who is dead null after 109 pages
i will vote for that person
VOTE: muh
So one inactive person defending another inactive person. Nice.
Posted: Sat Nov 28, 2020 5:13 am
by Albert B. Rampage
In post 2711, May wrote:i think DGB has been fairly towny
she has this towntell where she's supremely confident and has a "you're wrong and i'm obviously correct" tone to her
believe it or not, she's more reasonable and less commanding as scum
I found it weird DGB didn't put a third vote on Nero when Guillotina claimed a guilty. She asked for more interactions. It seemed uncharacteristic for her and out of sync with the game flow.
Posted: Sat Nov 28, 2020 8:28 am
by DrippingGoofball
In post 2709, Glitch wrote: In post 2705, muh316 wrote:VOTE: Non lmh
This slot has been avoiding the conversation for a long time and has managed to dodge replacement.
This is the laziest take I think yoh could possibly make. Do you have reasons for your vote being placed on lmh other than the fact that they're low activity? Is that all you've got on page 483920166402?
Sure it's lazy, but kudos for going after a lursack on page 483535654402. It has to be done.
Posted: Sat Nov 28, 2020 8:32 am
by DrippingGoofball
In post 2713, Albert B. Rampage wrote: In post 2711, May wrote:i think DGB has been fairly towny
she has this towntell where she's supremely confident and has a "you're wrong and i'm obviously correct" tone to her
believe it or not, she's more reasonable and less commanding as scum
I found it weird DGB didn't put a third vote on Nero when Guillotina claimed a guilty. She asked for more interactions. It seemed uncharacteristic for her and out of sync with the game flow.
Why should I have voted? The whole thing was really dodgy. I was puzzled, intrigued and exasperated at once.
Under these circumstances, voting a claimed guilty without question is sus LOL.
Posted: Sat Nov 28, 2020 8:34 am
by DrippingGoofball
In post 2712, muh316 wrote: In post 2710, May wrote:don't know about that muh guy but i have a person pushing someone who is dead null after 109 pages
i will vote for that person
VOTE: muh
So one inactive person defending another inactive person. Nice.
What's with the weird resistance to yeeting Nom Ihm?
Posted: Sat Nov 28, 2020 8:55 am
by Albert B. Rampage
In post 2671, innocentvillager wrote:1. what was scum thinking about this point?
2. how do they want to interact with the thread at this point?
3. how do they want to position around Nero and Guil, given that they know neither are scum?
In post 2715, DrippingGoofball wrote:Why should I have voted? The whole thing was really dodgy. I was puzzled, intrigued and exasperated at once.
Posted: Sat Nov 28, 2020 8:56 am
by Albert B. Rampage
VOTE: DGB
Posted: Sat Nov 28, 2020 11:14 am
by Insanoflex
Best as I can tell Non Imh is like this in all their games. I don't feel like going for a policy vote today when we've had 2 straight day phases that were basically trolled.
Posted: Sat Nov 28, 2020 12:34 pm
by innocentvillager
I was kind hoping for more lurker content but uhh
I’ll get back this at some point
Posted: Sat Nov 28, 2020 12:35 pm
by innocentvillager
In post 2676, Starbuck wrote:Checking in. I have a work event this afternoon and into tonight and all day tomorrow. So I'll be able to do some reading come Sunday.
Anyone want to give me some cliffs notes?
this slot is likely to be town
Posted: Sat Nov 28, 2020 1:12 pm
by Glitch
In post 2710, May wrote:don't know about that muh guy but i have a person pushing someone who is dead null after 109 pages
i will vote for that person
VOTE: muh
Sheepy vote, easy and opportune timing to place that without having to say anything controversial and a good vote holder. Scum points
Posted: Sat Nov 28, 2020 1:12 pm
by Glitch
In post 2711, May wrote:i think DGB has been fairly towny
she has this towntell where she's supremely confident and has a "you're wrong and i'm obviously correct" tone to her
believe it or not, she's more reasonable and less commanding as scum
I don't see this kind of attitude from DGB at all when she's town
Posted: Sat Nov 28, 2020 1:15 pm
by Glitch
In post 2713, Albert B. Rampage wrote: In post 2711, May wrote:i think DGB has been fairly towny
she has this towntell where she's supremely confident and has a "you're wrong and i'm obviously correct" tone to her
believe it or not, she's more reasonable and less commanding as scum
I found it weird DGB didn't put a third vote on Nero when Guillotina claimed a guilty. She asked for more interactions. It seemed uncharacteristic for her and out of sync with the game flow.
That would only be suspicious if Nero had flipped scum. If she were scum she would have voted him easily to get him lynched. I think there's plenty of reasons to question DGB but this isn't a solid one.