Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2012 10:07 am
Page 110 of 179
Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2012 10:17 am
↑ callforjudgement wrote:
There are 31 alive. Nobody Special is dead, as is MattP.
Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2012 10:40 am
↑ callforjudgement wrote:
Wow, there were 3 as well. I'd managed to miss manho's flip, somehow. This game's just too large for me to reallydoanything with the flips. (I think I'm on record as saying I don't like larges.)
Meanwhile, you pushed wagons on two scum (and you seem to have been suspiciously sure of yourself), and have completely been avoiding talking about NS or his flip. Does this mean anything? If not, why does it mean anything with me? You seem to care about lynching me more than you care about reasoning.(Are you third party?)
this is a bad post esp bolded part
Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2012 11:38 am
I'm trying to find a viable reason for Amrun to push on me so hard with so little reasoning.
Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2012 2:07 pm
are you functionally retarded
Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2012 2:08 pm
Also you apparently can't read. I analyzed NS AND his flip AND his wagon. Adurrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrp
Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2012 2:10 pm
↑ kondi2424 wrote:
Some VT having to call you confirmed town until he admits to his lie, resulting in his mislynch would be better for a scumteam than an argument to call one of the members town until they lynch him for failing to be nightkilled.
kondi is not only town, he is 100% right.
I think the reason callforjudgement is trying to make kondi appear scummy is to throw doubt on mattp's reads.
such as this one:
callforjudgement didn't ever bother to throw doubt on mattp's "results" until after mattp died and it seemed like there was a small chance of saving his own ass.
vote: cfj for death death death death
Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2012 2:11 pm
I'm sorry, that was rude. I"m in a bad mood. 
I apologize.
But basically everything in your post is wrong.
You posted during ALL THREE lynch wagons and NEVER VOTED ANY OF THEM, and more than that, NEVER even commented on their wagons despite posting vote counts. Plus you keep posting terribly scummy things like post 2724.
I talked about NS and his flip quite a lot today; I didn't talk about it yesterday because I was not around at all and did not post during that time period. Like have you read anything of this game ever.
I have posted quite a lot of reasoning for cfj scum. You're not even remotely paying attention but are pretending to do so. That's more.
I apologize.But basically everything in your post is wrong.
You posted during ALL THREE lynch wagons and NEVER VOTED ANY OF THEM, and more than that, NEVER even commented on their wagons despite posting vote counts. Plus you keep posting terribly scummy things like post 2724.
I talked about NS and his flip quite a lot today; I didn't talk about it yesterday because I was not around at all and did not post during that time period. Like have you read anything of this game ever.
I have posted quite a lot of reasoning for cfj scum. You're not even remotely paying attention but are pretending to do so. That's more.
Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2012 2:12 pm
↑ kondi2424 wrote:↑ Muffin Wednesday wrote:Also, callforjudgement townslipped in 498 by mentioning the possibility of pre-game talk when mykonian obviously started the game as soon as PMs were sent out.
this does not convince me. scum could easily fake that.
and compared to the real damning evidence which is callforjudgement not decrying mattp immediately as a fake cop, we know for 100% sure he's either scum or third-party.
Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2012 2:16 pm
↑ callforjudgement wrote:
Wow, there were 3 as well. I'd managed to miss manho's flip, somehow.(I think I'm on record as saying I don't like larges.)This game's just too large for me to reallydoanything with the flips.
Meanwhile, you pushed wagons on two scum (and you seem to have been suspiciously sure of yourself), and have completely been avoiding talking about NS or his flip. Does this mean anything? If not, why does it mean anything with me? You seem to care about lynching me more than you care about reasoning. (Are you third party?)
soooo mr. hey-i-have-so-much-time-on-my-hands-that-i'm-gonna-do-pseudo-votecounts is now saying he can't be assed to iso HIMSELF and throw some pretty colors in there, even if nothing else for a bunch of IoA? yeaaaa not buying it
this needs SO dead
Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2012 2:17 pm
and then of course what amrun said 3 posts ago which is also fantastic
wake me up when cfj is dead
pew pew pew
wake me up when cfj is dead
pew pew pew
Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2012 2:21 pm
I accept this for now
UNVOTE:
Current activity: looking into ISOs
Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2012 2:34 pm
↑ Amrun wrote:I'm sorry, that was rude. I"m in a bad mood. :( I apologize.
But basically everything in your post is wrong.
You posted during ALL THREE lynch wagons and NEVER VOTED ANY OF THEM, and more than that, NEVER even commented on their wagons despite posting vote counts. Plus you keep posting terribly scummy things like post 2724.
I talked about NS and his flip quite a lot today; I didn't talk about it yesterday because I was not around at all and did not post during that time period. Like have you read anything of this game ever.
I have posted quite a lot of reasoning for cfj scum. You're not even remotely paying attention but are pretending to do so. That's more.
I voted for NS, and even got quite some flak for doing so. (And I tried to find mentions of him post-wagon by searching your ISO, and didn't; it seems you decided to spontaneously change abbreviation.)
And I don't have a lot of time on my hands. (Vote counting is a very quick thing to do if you keep it up to date.)
Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2012 2:34 pm
[color=#000ff][/color]
See, like that, I just counted since I wrote my last post. That was, what, a few seconds?
See, like that, I just counted since I wrote my last post. That was, what, a few seconds?
Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2012 2:37 pm
(Err, and should have previewed…)
If you look for votes in posts as you read them, it really doesn't take long to count at all; when I read a post, I update the vote count (which is a few seconds), then it's just a case of pasting it into the thread. Part of the reason I volunteered to do this was for practice in counting quickly.
@UberNinja: I voted NS entirely on the basis that it would test MattP's results. Does that count as "not throwing doubt" to you?
If you look for votes in posts as you read them, it really doesn't take long to count at all; when I read a post, I update the vote count (which is a few seconds), then it's just a case of pasting it into the thread. Part of the reason I volunteered to do this was for practice in counting quickly.
@UberNinja: I voted NS entirely on the basis that it would test MattP's results. Does that count as "not throwing doubt" to you?
Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2012 2:39 pm
Delta, that's EXACTLY what I said and what you voted me for.
UN, let's assume I'm right again. Who else is a viable lynch? Also, your reasoning for cfj not immediately calling Matt's claim false is wrong because Matt didn't claim a guilty on cfj.
Same question to Amrun.
UN, let's assume I'm right again. Who else is a viable lynch? Also, your reasoning for cfj not immediately calling Matt's claim false is wrong because Matt didn't claim a guilty on cfj.
Same question to Amrun.
Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2012 4:01 pm
Oh, you did vote him, but in a way that etc. Talked about it before. Forgot.
kondi, I kind of like bbmolla as scum but not with cfj, so conflicted.
kondi, I kind of like bbmolla as scum but not with cfj, so conflicted.
Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2012 4:14 pm
I'm 100% down to lynch callforjudgement right now. Wake me up when he's dead; not much use posting until that happens. Later.
Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2012 4:18 pm
So UN is unwilling to listen. Great.
Amrun, could you summarize BB-scum for me?
Amrun, could you summarize BB-scum for me?
Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2012 4:30 pm
I'd probably vote me if I didn't have my role PM.
Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2012 4:30 pm
Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2012 5:07 pm
VOTE: callforjudgement
Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2012 5:42 pm
VOTE: callforjudgement
Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2012 6:20 pm