the thread title sucked the whole game

[emps]

ty

[Garmr]

i get like being somewhat emotional/kinda toxic during games but like its post game dude

Meh it continued from the dead thread and it's not like I can see what's in the scum chat during the game. I was planning on ending it but bob chimed in.

So i'll end it with this.

Other than that this game was fun.

[Firebringer]

lol fire did check me that night. I knew i couldnt make the nk.

it took me way too long to realize my clear on you was bs.

[Garmr]

@Fire
You still my mason buddy ?

[Garmr]

@Bob

Also I agree with the scum meta thing on your end. This game was similar to your town game. So that's why I didn't give the meta thing any attention in game.

[Firebringer]

@Fire
You still my mason buddy ?

sure

[Iconeum]

also can we like not argue post game and stuff

also wow ico you told them to jk me because i did that one good pr play in 1942?

your reads were slightly off this game, but you used your PR very well. Jailing you as scum is never a bad idea.

[Iconeum]

lol fire did check me that night. I knew i couldnt make the nk.

it took me way too long to realize my clear on you was bs.

[Iconeum]

Like legit looking down on me was one of if not the biggest downfalls of scum this game.

umm like legit the biggest downfall of scum this game was the N1 kill not going through

that's pretty much undebattable

like mastina said, if that happened this might have been a glorious scum roflstomp

[Iconeum]

You didn't get me lynched garmr

My day 2 was almost entirely theatre

[Iconeum]

even with garmr's good reads, I don't think he should take the credit for town winning this

I don't think I can point to one town player MVP here

Gamma made an excellent save that was crucial

Emps, despite pushing several mislynches, used the PR and got scum confused by faking part of it. Made it to endgame and was town enough to convince the worst to hammer scum

the worst had the charisma and style to hold some of the town together and made it to endgame where he correctly lynched scum to win the game. I don't think it was a 'confscum' feeling he had with bob, so anything was possible there.

maybe i'm forgetting a few events/players here but that's from the top of my head

[the worst]

MLB towning their slot tf up and turning the tables against iconeum was huge. Skyg's reads were good when they counted and she did a good job of keeping her cards close to her chest (for someone who isn't "in the game" totally as a vt, trying to eat a NK is the best thing you can possibly do)

I don't think anyone really played badly tbh

[Iconeum]

I don't think anyone really played badly tbh

i'm not saying this but rather that it was a good town play as a whole rather then what I (mostly?) see as 1 or 2 strong individuals carrying the game

[DrDolittle]

Thanks I too think I contributed significantly to the win

[Iconeum]

why the fuck is ico even on the menu rn?

(just joking )

[Garmr]

@ico
I'm not saying i won the game alone. I just think scum under estimated me and they got hit.

Sigh i wasn't going to respond.

[Iconeum]

@ico I'm not saying i won the game alone

This is literally the problem.

[Ankamius]

My point was that you didn't have the influence to leverage your lynches despite having strong reads

That's an important distinction

[bob3141]

also can we like not argue post game and stuff

also wow ico you told them to jk me because i did that one good pr play in 1942?

They reaped what they sow. Talk Trash yet can't back it up. Them arguing is just them trying to save face.

You remind me of player i use to play with. It was coop game but if he ever got into arguement with anyone he would just become toxic. If your only arguement against a point is to start swearing and insulting players there is no point in replying garmr

There is a difference between trash talk and pointing out flaws in your case. Flaws that prevent you acting on your reads or getting mislynches.

[Garmr]

also can we like not argue post game and stuff

also wow ico you told them to jk me because i did that one good pr play in 1942?

They reaped what they sow. Talk Trash yet can't back it up. Them arguing is just them trying to save face.

You remind me of player i use to play with. It was coop game but if he ever got into arguement with anyone he would just become toxic. If your only arguement against a point is to start swearing and insulting players there is no point in replying garmr

There is a difference between trash talk and pointing out flaws in your case. Flaws that prevent you acting on your reads or getting mislynches.

No offence but you didn't actually point flaws in my case.

Your failure to understand

how I got a scum read on you doesn't make it wrong reasons.

Also I'm not

swearing and insulting players

I haven't swore once. All I'm literally arguing is that you guys talked trash in the mafia thread (which is how I interpreted it.). Then after me and ank had are thing I was going to end it there

But you had to get your word in. You are at fault here Bob for continuing something. If you didn't want me arguing with you wouldn't of opened your mouth as you could see me and ank were annoyed at each other. But it's obvious now you are the type of person who has to insert themselves into drama were they don't belong.

Then ico started it again when I was going to end it. I don't really care about his post because they are just trying to make light and be edgy.

Also I was quite civil in the dead thread I think (well tried to be).

[Garmr]

@ico I'm not saying i won the game alone

This is literally the problem.

Well can your dick?

[bob3141]

also can we like not argue post game and stuff

also wow ico you told them to jk me because i did that one good pr play in 1942?

They reaped what they sow. Talk Trash yet can't back it up. Them arguing is just them trying to save face.

You remind me of player i use to play with. It was coop game but if he ever got into arguement with anyone he would just become toxic. If your only arguement against a point is to start swearing and insulting players there is no point in replying garmr

There is a difference between trash talk and pointing out flaws in your case. Flaws that prevent you acting on your reads or getting mislynches.

No offence but you didn't actually point flaws in my case.

Your failure to understand

how I got a scum read on you doesn't make it wrong reasons.

Also I'm not

swearing and insulting players

I haven't swore once. All I'm literally arguing is that you guys talked trash in the mafia thread (which is how I interpreted it.). Then after me and ank had are thing I was going to end it there

But you had to get your word in. You are at fault here Bob for continuing something. If you didn't want me arguing with you wouldn't of opened your mouth as you could see me and ank were annoyed at each other. But it's obvious now you are the type of person who has to insert themselves into drama were they don't belong.

Then ico started it again when I was going to end it. I don't really care about his post because they are just trying to make light and be edgy.

Also I was quite civil in the dead thread I think (well tried to be).

Thought i had made my quite self clear

[Garmr]

also can we like not argue post game and stuff

also wow ico you told them to jk me because i did that one good pr play in 1942?

They reaped what they sow. Talk Trash yet can't back it up. Them arguing is just them trying to save face.

You remind me of player i use to play with. It was coop game but if he ever got into arguement with anyone he would just become toxic. If your only arguement against a point is to start swearing and insulting players there is no point in replying garmr

There is a difference between trash talk and pointing out flaws in your case. Flaws that prevent you acting on your reads or getting mislynches.

No offence but you didn't actually point flaws in my case.

Your failure to understand

how I got a scum read on you doesn't make it wrong reasons.

Also I'm not

swearing and insulting players

I haven't swore once. All I'm literally arguing is that you guys talked trash in the mafia thread (which is how I interpreted it.). Then after me and ank had are thing I was going to end it there

But you had to get your word in. You are at fault here Bob for continuing something. If you didn't want me arguing with you wouldn't of opened your mouth as you could see me and ank were annoyed at each other. But it's obvious now you are the type of person who has to insert themselves into drama were they don't belong.

Then ico started it again when I was going to end it. I don't really care about his post because they are just trying to make light and be edgy.

Also I was quite civil in the dead thread I think (well tried to be).

Thought i had made my quite self clear

Well I thought I did to but apparently I'm not good at expressing myself.

But there's no point in continuing arguing and souring relationships.

I still believe you don't understand all the points on how I got my scum read through night actions. That won't change.

but I'm sorry if you thought I was insulting you that was not my intention. Friends?

[Garmr]

Calmed down now.

[Ankamius]

Tbf what I'm mainly annoyed about is that the impression I get from how you went about it is that you had good reads therefore you carried, and the rest of town just shit the bed by not seeing it too

That's the type of mindset I find very annoying in mafia because I have the opinion that people focus way too much on read strength rather than finding the path to endgame with the highest odds of winning

You don't need an especially good read accuracy if you know how to push town into a won endgame

I feel like the most I've ever improved as town is when I got myself out of the lynch scum mindset and into the force all scum to out themselves to everyone else mindset

I run into far fewer traps that way and the ones I do are a lot more obvious so I can work around them