Posted: Wed Sep 18, 2019 10:27 am
NahIn post 2720, Cafe Stile wrote:Eva if you’re taking my reads on ddl into consideration then just townread us already
- Hideri
https://forum.mafiascum-staging.net/
NahIn post 2720, Cafe Stile wrote:Eva if you’re taking my reads on ddl into consideration then just townread us already
- Hideri
I'll believe it when DDL flips red.In post 2725, Lady Eventide wrote:NahIn post 2720, Cafe Stile wrote:Eva if you’re taking my reads on ddl into consideration then just townread us already
- Hideri
10/10In post 2729, popsofctown wrote:In a large, you run someone up to L-1, if they claim a powerful role you potentially unvote, and if they claim VT you lynch them.
In a role madness there are no VTs but to achieve a semblance of balance there will be a several roles in the setup so watered down they are essentially VTs.
When you run such a role up to L-1 and it claims that is a "VT" claim. You don't spend investigatives clearing the watered down role or honoring the hypothetical creativity in the way it was made up. You lynch.
Thank you for coming to my ted talk
s-shut up b-bakaIn post 2734, Cafe Stile wrote:You’re such a tsundere
In post 2733, Hidden Happiness wrote:Ok but, I'm not voting a slot I can clear
Why don't you stop rolefishingIn post 2737, popsofctown wrote:In post 2733, Hidden Happiness wrote:Ok but, I'm not voting a slot I can clearWhy can't you just clear a different slot?
Because scum aint gonna lynch themselves, i bet LE must be a powerful scum role to have this much resistanceIn post 2739, gameplay506 wrote:Seriously what are we doing?
We've been centering the game around 1 person for probably 50 pages now. This is a golden opportunity going into day 2.
Obviously we are doing something wrong if we are attempting swings for people like LLD WHO HAVE BEEN MOSTLY INACTIVE TODAY.
You've joined Ephiraim on Planet Wrong, I see.In post 2740, Tana and Ephraim wrote:Because scum aint gonna lynch themselves, i bet LE must be a powerful scum role to have this much resistanceIn post 2739, gameplay506 wrote:Seriously what are we doing?
We've been centering the game around 1 person for probably 50 pages now. This is a golden opportunity going into day 2.
Obviously we are doing something wrong if we are attempting swings for people like LLD WHO HAVE BEEN MOSTLY INACTIVE TODAY.
-Tana
You're the best worst town I've ever played with, or else a peerless wolf. Either way, good fucking hunting.In post 2729, popsofctown wrote:In a large, you run someone up to L-1, if they claim a powerful role you potentially unvote, and if they claim VT you lynch them.
In a role madness there are no VTs but to achieve a semblance of balance there will be a several roles in the setup so watered down they are essentially VTs.
When you run such a role up to L-1 and it claims that is a "VT" claim. You don't spend investigatives clearing the watered down role or honoring the hypothetical creativity in the way it was made up. You lynch.
Thank you for coming to my ted talk
I'M SORRY? BEHAVIOR PROBLEM???????In post 2718, Hidden Happiness wrote:You know, this isn't even wrong.In post 2665, Tana and Ephraim wrote:the best mathematical way to determine Maria's alignment is to see how many scum versus town are voting her when she gets wagoned
when she's scum her entire scumteam are always on the wagon, when she's town usually she's getting wagoned by town and scum are just letting it happen
Let's talk about RCEs hop on me.
We already knew Gamma was gonna do it because of Gamma's behavior problem.
How about we don't lynch LE?
@LE I'm fine with DDL