In post 2699, Looker wrote:chkflip is the Donald Trump of this thread and my wagon is deep red state
I kinda want you dead just for this, it’s like a 21st century Godwin’s law
Yeah it's pretty aggrivating that he's making it like it's some race thing (his comment on Lav's meme) and then doubling and tripling down on this Trump thing but I'm generally just fucking ignoring it at this point. Even the "someone insulted me who I feel like didn't have blahblah ego bullshit" is just getting glossed the fuck over. He's being purposefully antagonistic and still widely ignoring a bunch of shit.
In post 2712, Gamma Emerald wrote:chkflip made what seemed like a similar comment earlier, but he’s never once yielded, so I think he kinda only wanted to appear impartial.
What is this in reference to?
In post 2720, BrightEyedFish wrote:I still would like to shred the Walt slot but I feel weird voting there again while the slot is vacant.
I guess it's time to truck on down the line to...
VOTE: Dave
What was the dave shit about? Genuinely don't remember.
In post 2699, Looker wrote:I'm Joe Cocchi, guitarist and main songwriter for Within The Ruins. The Baker's liked him since high school, he's the Michael Winslow of guitar, whatever the fuck that is lmao, and I'm a Vanilla Shredder. I also have a video of him playing "Calling Card" from Within The Ruins' album Phenomena in 2014. Did you know he ripped off the Inspector Gadget them song?
Something in here doesn't look right. I'm going to hammer. I don't want vigged tonight, so I'm giving intent.
In post 2699, Looker wrote:davesaz is baffling. I don't see how I'm obfuscating when I'm providing links to everything, as opposed to wall-posting. Most of the bottom bullet points are the more irrelevant things to me anyway.
If they're irrelevant then why are you going to that much trouble to post them, with embedded links, instead of posting relevant stuff?
Huh, you know the game that I mentioned that I was in with Looker (where he was scum), he was doing these same style posts with the links. In his most recent (I think) town game, Mini Normal 2154, he did them here and there, but not every single post. Is this one of the previous encounters that Chk is going off of? Walter was in this game, too, and I wish he was around for his insight.
Is he just forever behind in our current game and it's NAI? That's what I'm leaning towards. I kinda get set in my ways when I feel like I'm forever in catch up mode.
I remember a post from you that seemed to have the implication that you be okay being wrong if you were wrong about thinking scum was town and they got shredded. That’s a fine sentiment but you don’t seem to be showing the cooperativeness that sort of mindset takes, so it looks like you posted it to posture.
In post 2699, Looker wrote:davesaz is baffling. I don't see how I'm obfuscating when I'm providing links to everything, as opposed to wall-posting. Most of the bottom bullet points are the more irrelevant things to me anyway.
If they're irrelevant then why are you going to that much trouble to post them, with embedded links, instead of posting relevant stuff?
Huh, you know the game that I mentioned that I was in with Looker (where he was scum), he was doing these same style posts with the links. In his most recent (I think) town game, Mini Normal 2154, he did them here and there, but not every single post. Is this one of the previous encounters that Chk is going off of? Walter was in this game, too, and I wish he was around for his insight.
Is he just forever behind in our current game and it's NAI? That's what I'm leaning towards. I kinda get set in my ways when I feel like I'm forever in catch up mode.
In post 2729, Galron wrote:You've been such a distraction, I wouldn't shed any tears if you took a bullet.
So what's your read of NPOM?
Do you want him gone because he's a distraction or because you legitimately think he's scum?
He's probably town, but he's a PIA. I'd rather not waste a yeet on him.
Posted: Sat Oct 10, 2020 4:39 am
by NoPowerOverMe
I never said Starbuck is dying. I just posted the coffee image to be funny since she said the wifom was spicy and it's starbucks pumpin spice.
Posted: Sat Oct 10, 2020 4:45 am
by chkflip
In post 2733, Gamma Emerald wrote:I remember a post from you that seemed to have the implication that you be okay being wrong if you were wrong about thinking scum was town and they got shredded. That’s a fine sentiment but you don’t seem to be showing the cooperativeness that sort of mindset takes, so it looks like you posted it to posture.
I'm uncertain with what you're attempting to suggest here. I am trying to lynch whom I believe is scum. Am I supposed to sheep shitty wagons I don't believe in to be a team player to you?
Like what does this post even mean, really.
Posted: Sat Oct 10, 2020 4:55 am
by NoPowerOverMe
Galron, are you intending to shoot Starbuck and trying to cast suspicion on me for no reason?
Posted: Sat Oct 10, 2020 5:09 am
by Galron
In post 2738, NoPowerOverMe wrote:Galron, are you intending to shoot Starbuck and trying to cast suspicion on me for no reason?
In post 2738, NoPowerOverMe wrote:Galron, are you intending to shoot Starbuck and trying to cast suspicion on me for no reason?
No, Starbuck's not going to die tonight.
How are you so sure?
Posted: Sat Oct 10, 2020 6:02 am
by davesaz
In post 2730, Starbuck wrote:Is he just forever behind in our current game and it's NAI? That's what I'm leaning towards. I kinda get set in my ways when I feel like I'm forever in catch up mode.
He's always looks caught up by the time he makes the post and he seems to be catching a lot of events.
Posted: Sat Oct 10, 2020 6:28 am
by chkflip
And not analyzing them whatsoever. He's just linking them with snide remarks. How the fuck is that even remotely acceptable as play? If we're letting that slide we're doing the gamestate a massive Goddamn disservice for one. It's like I can just say Emerald has been attempting to shade me at every corner and calling him a poo butt for doing it. How is that helpful, like, at all?
Posted: Sat Oct 10, 2020 7:41 am
by davesaz
I'm not bothered at all by BEF looking at my IKS vote.
I don't think being so shallow is especially towny, but I don't know if that's AI for BEF.
In post 2733, Gamma Emerald wrote:I remember a post from you that seemed to have the implication that you be okay being wrong if you were wrong about thinking scum was town and they got shredded. That’s a fine sentiment but you don’t seem to be showing the cooperativeness that sort of mindset takes, so it looks like you posted it to posture.
I'm uncertain with what you're attempting to suggest here. I am trying to lynch whom I believe is scum. Am I supposed to sheep shitty wagons I don't believe in to be a team player to you?
Like what does this post even mean, really.
I would expect if you meant what you said about “being happy to be wrong twice” you’d be a little less stubborn about how much you defend votes you don’t like.
Posted: Sat Oct 10, 2020 11:21 am
by Almost50
I also think we could shred the VT claim rather than out a PR. We are not guaranteed to actually wagon scum if we chose not to go through with this wagon, so "we lose a town vote" isn't really a good argument. (Also, if VTs are meant to eat NKs, this one isn't because they've already claimed)
