Posted: Sun Oct 18, 2020 2:00 pm
Those two thoughts were independent of each other, but tbh i'm not really following their back and forth.... kinda seems to be something I can't grok.
I don't think "grrr you shouldn't have us in the same tier" is an "obvious question", like, if y'all were both leanscum would you have pitched the same fit? I hadn't seen/recalled anything in my reading to push you two one way or the other. I think that was a half-baked distancing attempt, actually, trying to push the idea that I shouldn't equate you two in my reads.In post 2677, The Bulge wrote:super defensive over such an obvious question reads like playing dumbIn post 2597, Gamma Emerald wrote:Why the fuck shouldn’t I? I’m not really judging every post and then summing how I felt up, I’m just going off of what I think as I read the thread. What the hell is the reason me having those 2 in the same tier of reads is such a critical offense? Because you and Bulge seem to be insinuating that.In post 2595, petapan wrote:how do you possibly have bulge and midwaybear in the same tier of reads though
what is this shitIn post 2639, Gamma Emerald wrote:Cool.
BTW just gonna set up a little scavenger hunt. Anyone is welcome to try and find the thing I think is reasonably scummy from myself, but whoever finds the right thing will get special attention. Could be good or bad attention. Multiple guesses are allowed but don't abuse them.
this is a joke, yea?In post 2644, Gamma Emerald wrote:What are the odds this is a townslip vs. faked?In post 1706, Bell wrote:Am I the only person alone in this game.
one or two, as I was operating under a 4 scum assumption thenIn post 2679, The Bulge wrote:more of what I see as potential shade from someone too scared of actually advocating for votes my way
GAMMA when you say "the rest", how many were you picturing?
should see a doctor about thatIn post 2721, Cabd wrote:I'm also starting to get petapan-shaped hives.
tbh i don't know what to make of his answer either but i don't think my issues with what he did were hard to understand?Cabd wrote:Those two thoughts were independent of each other, but tbh i'm not really following their back and forth.... kinda seems to be something I can't grok.
what do you think is scummy from me? What is the strongest thing you see there that points to me being scum?In post 2716, Alisae wrote:Gamma actually has a lot more scum equity then I thought tbh
what does this meanIn post 2720, Alisae wrote:I think the thing I dislike the most is his positioning with his reads is what stands out to meIn post 2716, Alisae wrote:Gamma actually has a lot more scum equity then I thought tbh
What reversal?In post 2731, Gamma Emerald wrote:btw, nice reversal there mwb
Charming
I guess. it's still weird you didnt point it out even if it doesn't affect your read of bell. early game you were pointing out every little thing you could but i still think it's odd independent of that.In post 2704, midwaybear wrote:Eh I don't really see how it's alignment indicative for Bell(yet) and I don't really care how he reads me.In post 2702, The Bulge wrote:...for a good reason, I assume?
In post 2712, Bell wrote:#2679: Where'd the old Bulge go?
im playing from behind baby, I want all the smokeIn post 2713, Bell wrote:You usually latch unto one person, what changed here?
saying you don't think I'm town after I FoS you and bulgeIn post 2733, midwaybear wrote:What reversal?In post 2731, Gamma Emerald wrote:btw, nice reversal there mwb
Setup spec mostly. It's just a theory rn but I wanted to speak on what I felt like could be the case if it were true.In post 2736, fferyllt wrote:Gamma what makes you think there is a second traitor?
do you really think I'm in any position right now to be instilling doubts?? i havent done shit of consequence this game, and I don't have any strong leads. why is my scum catchup tactic to come in and shoot a bunch of spitballs at everyone voting me? your logic doesnt make sense, and even less so if you claim to be reading my process. nobody except conftown has engaged me this phase. plenty of you, however, have expressed interest in voting me. it's the difference between trying to solve a gamestate and trying to push a gamestate. no wagon has formed on me because it would be a shit wagon. but a lot of people want everyone to know they'd be okay with it if it came to it! what's that called again when you try to covertly suggest that someone is scummy without pushing it uhhhhhIn post 2714, petapan wrote:In post 2701, The Bulge wrote:obviously I have doubts about everyone I mentioned, and then some. If my intention was to throw shade, what good would it do to not make any conclusions? When you're looking at my process, are you looking in iso?i mean that's kind of the point of throwing shade, though, isn't it, you don't attack people too strong but this is a position where it's beneficial to scum to start instilling doubts about as many people as possible because options fr votes are severely limited. in concert with the rest of your post where you accuse people of throwing shade at you without engaging you or w/e, of course i'm gonna take that as critical toward me. and you drop the conclusion of "idk what to say about this post rn but like when are we yeeting bell?" which is a fairly fuckin gross statement given i see basically no rationale for itIn post 2703, The Bulge wrote:also this doesnt really read to me as "questioning me" so much as defending yourself in the form of a questionIn post 2685, petapan wrote:are you trying to claim there's a problem with me having a start of day list trying to close out the game via PoE when we had 3 conftown and several strong townreadsIn post 2679, The Bulge wrote:peta's first post of d2, 2 pages into the phase. this post, oddly enough, bears striking similarities to Bell's latest reads which.... I don't know what to make of that
trying to argue a different between "questioning" you and "defending myself in the form of a question" is just nitpicking.
it's not. my point is you ignored the context around that post and jumped to where it looked like I was shading you and you felt the need to explain yourself before any back-and-forth had actually begun.In post 2714, petapan wrote:trying to argue a different between "questioning" you and "defending myself in the form of a question" is just nitpicking.
In post 2529, fferyllt wrote:Bulge, you seem to be scumhunting based on how players are reading you. I think that's a useful channel of info given the ease of poe-ing you.
In post 2678, The Bulge wrote:I'm in an embarrassingly unique position right now (at the time of writing, cabd has exactly 10x my postcount) so I want to use that to my advantage before drifting too far from it. obviously this channel works best with the knowledge that I am town but hopefully some of you can tune in and see if what I'm saying makes sense.
lmao nahIn post 2740, The Bulge wrote:no wagon has formed on me because it would be a shit wagon.
I just don't understand how you yourself posted the activity overview in-thread all formatted and everything and you don't see what's strange about putting the same single-word descriptor on our slot, ESPECIALLY unsorted, although any tier would have been unusual at the very least.In post 2726, Gamma Emerald wrote:I don't think "grrr you shouldn't have us in the same tier" is an "obvious question", like, if y'all were both leanscum would you have pitched the same fit? I hadn't seen/recalled anything in my reading to push you two one way or the other. I think that was a half-baked distancing attempt, actually, trying to push the idea that I shouldn't equate you two in my reads.In post 2677, The Bulge wrote:super defensive over such an obvious question reads like playing dumbIn post 2597, Gamma Emerald wrote:Why the fuck shouldn’t I? I’m not really judging every post and then summing how I felt up, I’m just going off of what I think as I read the thread. What the hell is the reason me having those 2 in the same tier of reads is such a critical offense? Because you and Bulge seem to be insinuating that.In post 2595, petapan wrote:how do you possibly have bulge and midwaybear in the same tier of reads though
what is this shitIn post 2639, Gamma Emerald wrote:Cool.
BTW just gonna set up a little scavenger hunt. Anyone is welcome to try and find the thing I think is reasonably scummy from myself, but whoever finds the right thing will get special attention. Could be good or bad attention. Multiple guesses are allowed but don't abuse them.
this is a joke, yea?In post 2644, Gamma Emerald wrote:What are the odds this is a townslip vs. faked?In post 1706, Bell wrote:Am I the only person alone in this game.
You wanna know what the scavenger hunt is supposed to be? Take part and you might find out!
Out of the people who said they felt like they were alone (Bell, Cakez, mwb), Bell's felt the least scripted, and more like an actually expression of real feelings. I admit it could just be because Bell has been consistently pushed this game, though.
so why don't you try to get a wagon going on him?In post 2744, petapan wrote:lmao nahIn post 2740, The Bulge wrote:no wagon has formed on me because it would be a shit wagon.
it would have been when i had 30 fucking postsIn post 2744, petapan wrote:lmao nahIn post 2740, The Bulge wrote:no wagon has formed on me because it would be a shit wagon.