Posted: Mon Oct 11, 2021 2:10 pm
In post 2723, unwnd wrote:Time for you to fucking taste my blade
TIME TO DIE
TIME TO WIND THE WATCH AND WND UNWND ONCE AND FOR ALL
TIME TO WIND THE WATCH AND WND UNWND ONCE AND FOR ALL
In post 2723, unwnd wrote:Time for you to fucking taste my blade
if this was the case then the second person would have to shoot the first because one of them dies we know thatIn post 2718, Dwlee99 wrote:Wait I think it's possible the people who get the gun can shoot anyone. And if the first person with gun doesn't shoot the other person then they also get a gun
And then you made a decision based on one lolIn post 2730, SirCakez wrote:I READ
30 FUCKING PAGES
AND YOU SAY THERE'S NOTHING FOR ME TO PIVOT ON?????
??????????????????????????????????????????????In post 2731, unwnd wrote:And then you made a decision based on one lolIn post 2730, SirCakez wrote:I READ
30 FUCKING PAGES
AND YOU SAY THERE'S NOTHING FOR ME TO PIVOT ON?????
True !In post 2729, ulyana wrote:if this was the case then the second person would have to shoot the first because one of them dies we know thatIn post 2718, Dwlee99 wrote:Wait I think it's possible the people who get the gun can shoot anyone. And if the first person with gun doesn't shoot the other person then they also get a gun
Can you clarify what “lights were off” means?In post 2603, ulyana wrote:like it felt like lights were off and i could relate to that
VOTE: TalyIn post 2734, Dwlee99 wrote:True !In post 2729, ulyana wrote:if this was the case then the second person would have to shoot the first because one of them dies we know thatIn post 2718, Dwlee99 wrote:Wait I think it's possible the people who get the gun can shoot anyone. And if the first person with gun doesn't shoot the other person then they also get a gun
Was kinda responding to infinity through your post, saying just because two people share thought process doesn’t mean they share alignmentIn post 2616, skitter30 wrote:?In post 2606, Gamma Emerald wrote:Mindmelding is not as much of a towntell as the memes would suggestIn post 2554, skitter30 wrote:fair enoughIn post 2543, Infinity 324 wrote:holding onto the read means that a) i'm claiming pets and gypyx are both scum but i townread peta or b) gypyx is scummy for having a thought process that town also had which is pretty questionable
YOU CAN RUNIn post 2744, unwnd wrote:Actually yeah
VOTE: Saber
I will get absolutely no support on this but don't care
Who is this to? Me?In post 2742, Taly wrote:But not me for skirting around?