Posted: Mon Mar 04, 2013 7:06 am
↑ goodmorning wrote:the votehopping he's done just doesn't look scummy in the slightest to me.
What about the reasons he has supplied for said votes?
What about the reasons he has supplied for said votes?
Page 12 of 47
What about the reasons he has supplied for said votes?
Posted: Mon Mar 04, 2013 8:10 am
Don't seem scummy either.
Posted: Mon Mar 04, 2013 8:16 am
Well I'm still open to a NS lynch, but I'd rather do someone else today because we can always lynch him tomorrow if he fails to live up to his promise to be more pro-town on day 2.
Any other candidates?
Any other candidates?
Posted: Mon Mar 04, 2013 9:52 am
Other than Edo, ppp hits me a bit sideways.
Posted: Mon Mar 04, 2013 12:12 pm
Alright, so Safety's wagon isn't really moving and I'm not going to be the one to move it.
I'll craft a full explanation of why later today.
UNVOTE:
I'll craft a full explanation of why later today.
UNVOTE:
Posted: Mon Mar 04, 2013 12:21 pm
unvote
It's a vote which you are unlikely to be critisized for making on day one because of NS's meta, and yet you've intentionally distanced yourself from your own vote, which makes you look paranoid.
↑ SafetyDance wrote:
DayVigging =/= Voting. I don't like FOS, I think it was bad, I wanted to put pressure on (and it got a reaction) for not voting, I did the only thing in my power to do so.
Obviously a single vote doesn't cause a lynch, but there is still nothing wrong with not voting until you have a high certainty level. Sure, pressure votes are fine but conservative voting is not a scumtell.
Post 268 makes SafetyDance look rather scum-like.
↑ Cub Daigoro wrote:↑ Gammagooey wrote:Deadline: Saturday, March 9th 1:00am EST
That's only four and a half days from now. Let's pick up the pace, kiddies.
And we shouldn't lynch until at least 24 hours before that. We need to use our time wisely.
Also Apozzle has so far only 1) voted for NS while 2) scummily distancing himself from his vote and has 3) hardly yet said anything that wasn't a defense of himself which leads me to
VOTE: Apozzle
Posted: Mon Mar 04, 2013 3:16 pm
Messiah ok'd being replaced by PM so Human Destroyer replaces Messiah!
Votecount #7
SafetyDance (3) Messiah, Belisarius, Cub Diagoro
Nobody Special (3) goodmorning, Apozzle, SafetyDance
Cub Diagoro (2) Nobody Special, implosion
Belisarius (1) Cheery Dog
pieceofpecanpie (1) Zaicon
Apozzle (1) ac1983fan
Cheery Dog (0)
implosion (0)
goodmorning (0)
Zaicon (0)
Edosurist (0)
ac1983fan (0)
Messiah (0)
Not Voting: Edosurist, pieceofpecanpie
With 13 alive, it takes 7 to lynch!
Deadline: Saturday, March 9th 1:00am EST
Posted: Mon Mar 04, 2013 3:20 pm
Hey all - 12 pages in an Open? Sounds boring.
Who should I be sheeping?
Who should I be sheeping?
Posted: Mon Mar 04, 2013 3:46 pm
u wanna die punk
Posted: Mon Mar 04, 2013 3:47 pm
An actual answer would be appreciated far more than a silly threat.
Posted: Mon Mar 04, 2013 5:05 pm
↑ Human Destroyer wrote:An actual answer would be appreciated far more than a silly threat.
It was a joke, as I was assuming your post was a joke. Are you indicating you were being serious, or this just a continuation of the joke?
Posted: Mon Mar 04, 2013 6:08 pm
HD!
My face is smiling so muchhhhhh
You should obviously sheep me, I keep forgetting this game exists.
My face is smiling so muchhhhhh
You should obviously sheep me, I keep forgetting this game exists.
Posted: Mon Mar 04, 2013 6:09 pm
Hey, I promise I'll get to this. Mondays (and Tuesdays) really aren't my best day, unless you want me staying up till 3am.
If I don't add any content by Wednesday... well... you know what to do.
If I don't add any content by Wednesday... well... you know what to do.
Posted: Mon Mar 04, 2013 6:14 pm
Welcome HD. You already have a higher post count than your predecessor. Good job. I can tell we are going to be friends.
Posted: Mon Mar 04, 2013 6:24 pm
Wow, good job ignoring questions asked directly of you
↑ Cub Daigoro wrote:Apozzle, do you have any thoughts yet on ac983fan, Belisarius, or Zaicon?
Posted: Mon Mar 04, 2013 6:55 pm
Post count =/= post quality.
Take this post, for example.
Take this post, for example.
Posted: Mon Mar 04, 2013 9:04 pm
Posted: Mon Mar 04, 2013 9:04 pm
↑ goodmorning wrote:It's mostly meta, but it's also that the votehopping he's done just doesn't look scummy in the slightest to me.
D you know for sure he doesn't votehop as scum, or is it the reasoning along with the jumps that make you think that way?
↑ pieceofpecanpie wrote:Alright, so Safety's wagon isn't really moving and I'm not going to be the one to move it.
I'll craft a full explanation of why later today.
UNVOTE:
Considering it have the most votes (and now has equal most votes), and has probably actually moved the most out of any wagon so far, what do you think has caused it to become stuck?
↑ goodmorning wrote:HD!
My face is smiling so muchhhhhh
You should obviously sheep me, I keep forgetting this game exists.
Why would you be a good person to sheep if you forget the game exists? Those two things together don't sound very much like a town-wincon.
Posted: Mon Mar 04, 2013 10:49 pm
↑ Cheery Dog wrote:↑ goodmorning wrote:It's mostly meta, but it's also that the votehopping he's done just doesn't look scummy in the slightest to me.
D you know for sure he doesn't votehop as scum, or is it the reasoning along with the jumps that make you think that way?
Well, from what I've seen he doesn't as Scum, but it's more the reasoning.
↑ goodmorning wrote:HD!
My face is smiling so muchhhhhh
You should obviously sheep me, I keep forgetting this game exists.
Why would you be a good person to sheep if you forget the game exists? Those two things together don't sound very much like a town-wincon.
Because it is sarcasm.
Posted: Tue Mar 05, 2013 12:26 am
↑ ac1983fan wrote:↑ Human Destroyer wrote:An actual answer would be appreciated far more than a silly threat.
It was a joke, as I was assuming your post was a joke. Are you indicating you were being serious, or this just a continuation of the joke?
I was being completely serious.
↑ goodmorning wrote:HD!
My face is smiling so muchhhhhh
You should obviously sheep me, I keep forgetting this game exists.
Weaksauce
Hi though
↑ ac1983fan wrote:
Wow, good job ignoring questions asked directly of you
↑ Cub Daigoro wrote:Apozzle, do you have any thoughts yet on ac983fan, Belisarius, or Zaicon?
Ooh a good vote
VOTE: Apozzle
Posted: Tue Mar 05, 2013 2:40 am
↑ pieceofpecanpie wrote:Alright, so Safety's wagon isn't really moving and I'm not going to be the one to move it.
I'll craft a full explanation of why later today.
UNVOTE:
It's tomorrow where I live. Is it still today where you are?
Posted: Tue Mar 05, 2013 2:44 am
↑ ac1983fan wrote:↑ SafetyDance wrote:
DayVigging =/= Voting. I don't like FOS, I think it was bad, I wanted to put pressure on (and it got a reaction) for not voting, I did the only thing in my power to do so.
Obviously a single vote doesn't cause a lynch, but there is still nothing wrong with not voting until you have a high certainty level. Sure, pressure votes are fine but conservative voting is not a scumtell.
Post 268 makes SafetyDance look rather scum-like.
What do you think of the remainder of the case on SD?
↑ Human Destroyer wrote:I was being completely serious.
Then sheep meeeeeeee!
Posted: Tue Mar 05, 2013 3:08 am
↑ goodmorning wrote:↑ Cheery Dog wrote:↑ goodmorning wrote:It's mostly meta, but it's also that the votehopping he's done just doesn't look scummy in the slightest to me.
D you know for sure he doesn't votehop as scum, or is it the reasoning along with the jumps that make you think that way?
Well, from what I've seen he doesn't as Scum, but it's more the reasoning.
Can you explain to me why reasoning that someone would only FoS if they were scum afraid of lynching their buddy looks like townie reasoning?
Can you explain the townie reasoning behind his vote on me in 54, his apparent retraction in 98, and his apparent retraction of his retraction after I voted him?
Posted: Tue Mar 05, 2013 4:01 am
OMG, NOW LOOK WHO'S HERE!!!!!!!1111eleventy-one
I'm getting deja-vu.
Yeah 12 pages, for you should be no sweat right, so why ask who to sheep? ^^
Answer is the NS-wagon btw.
↑ ac1983fan wrote:
↑ SafetyDance wrote:
DayVigging =/= Voting. I don't like FOS, I think it was bad, I wanted to put pressure on (and it got a reaction) for not voting, I did the only thing in my power to do so.
Obviously a single vote doesn't cause a lynch, but there is still nothing wrong with not voting until you have a high certainty level. Sure, pressure votes are fine but conservative voting is not a scumtell.
Did you read the first part? FOS =/= conservative voting.
I
think its a rather scummy thing to do, right HD?↑ goodmorning wrote:
Why would you be a good person to sheep if you forget the game exists? Those two things together don't sound very much like a town-wincon.
Because it is sarcasm.
I think the people here are very astute at picking that up.
↑ ac1983fan wrote:↑ Human Destroyer wrote:An actual answer would be appreciated far more than a silly threat.
It was a joke, as I was assuming your post was a joke. Are you indicating you were being serious, or this just a continuation of the joke?
Remind me not to call you when I next need a comedian.
Posted: Tue Mar 05, 2013 4:02 am
↑ Cub Daigoro wrote:Do you still think I'm NS's scumbuddy?
Depends on how he flips.
↑ Cub Daigoro wrote:If I ever mod a game, I'm going to have a policy of including prod-dodge posts in my prod counts.
Then you're going to spend more time in the RQ than your own game I think
Spoiler:
Congrats, you've become a strawman (I learnt that word from GM btw)!
My vote for you was when? Post #54 wasn't it? Funny how you didn't bother to quote that. Anything after that is irrelevant, just like anything you say after your RVS-excuse for leaving your vote on NS is irrelevant as a basis to why I did vote you in Post #54.