Mafiascum.net

By the bye, Fuzzy's recent posts are not substance. This is an empty theory debate that's acting as a scapegoat for Fuzzy's lack of content.

What you're suggesting is called a policy kill. There is no town motivation behind it.

↑ fuzzybutternut wrote:What you're suggesting is called a policy kill. There is no town motivation behind it.

Killing people who are actively refusing to bring content to the table is a policy kill and not a strategic one how?

Do elaborate.

Hey guys
I'm replacing Baboon
Reading thread now

because we gain nothing from the kill but the players alignment. We don't get their thoughts, we don't get who they think is scum, we get nothing.

Hey GNR. o/

↑ fuzzybutternut wrote:because we gain nothing from the kill but the players alignment. We don't get their thoughts, we don't get who they think is scum, we get nothing.

Keeping them in the game yields essentially the same.

I'm through with this theory debate, by the way. I can only pray to the lord that if there is a vig, he won't listen to Fuzzy.

Uhh, no it doesn't. Keeping them in game gives them a chance to talk and voice their opinion.

I sure as hell hope they don't listen to you. That's the shittiest argument I've heard in a long time.

This gets roped today.

Good for you.

↑ Bacde wrote:

↑ Siveure DtTrikyp wrote:How does that follow?

I'm saying there's not really anything to indicate I'm town, I would think.

your actions and words indicate your alignment

scott is voting you since you have made mostly terrible votes and posts, yet I, having played with you, know that terrible posts and votes tend to be what you do as town

thus scott's reason for voting you isn't indicative of your alignment imo, and thus not a good reason to vote you

are you or are you not town?

Can you provide links from other completed games to verify?

Read thread

Grasping at straws in arguements
Also, persistance with vigging the lurkers. Since the vig is limited, we shouldn't waste the shots on someone who isn't participating in discussions. You have presented 3 people for shooting. That's 3/12 or about 25% of the player list. Since the same percentage for a chance of someone getting scum, we have a 12.5% chance that you would hit scum with the vig shot. This isn't very ideal. I think those shots should be saved for later. I feel they would come in handy later in the game rather than earlier. Of course, this is assuming we even have a vig, which we don't know if we do or not

Where have I "grasped at straws"?

Also, you evidently do not understand the theory argument as well. That's really beyond the boundaries that my willpower can go.

persistent scum is persistent.

Why can't I be persistent town?

Top scum reads: {fuzzybutternut, Guy_Named_Riggs, FuDuzn}. I am extremely confident that at least two scum are in here.

Because persistent town does town things. You are not.
There's an OMGUS statement if I ever saw one.

↑ fuzzybutternut wrote:There's an OMGUS statement if I ever saw one.

I've voiced suspicion on you prior to this argument.

↑ kcudz wrote:Where have I "grasped at straws"?

trying to ward off suspicion saying you're a noob. Why should that matter?
Using punctuation as a scum tell. Really?
Backpedaling on arguments.

Also, Shisou vote came out of nowhere
And the game started five days ago. That's not really "PLENTY of time to provide content." Some people can't be on all the time


I understand the theory fine. Though I have to wonder if you do

PEdit: Why do you think two of the three of us are scum? Or really, why do you think any of us are scum?

Uh, I was talking about GNR. He literally just came in the game, voted you, and all of a sudden he's scum.

Floundering scum is floundering.

↑ Guy_Named_Riggs wrote:trying to ward off suspicion saying you're a noob. Why should that matter?

I was not under any suspicion when I said that. Where's the warding?

↑ Guy_Named_Riggs wrote:Using punctuation as a scum tell. Really?

I used it implicitly to describe an unnatural thought process taking place. That, and it was on page one. What's your point?

↑ Guy_Named_Riggs wrote:Backpedaling on arguments.

Please quote the exact posts.

↑ Guy_Named_Riggs wrote:Also, Shisou vote came out of nowhere

You obviously did not read the thread thoroughly enough.

↑ Guy_Named_Riggs wrote:And the game started five days ago. That's not really "PLENTY of time to provide content." Some people can't be on all the time

People have posted several times in that time span. They posted filler. If they post filler, surely they have time to offer an idea/opinion? I don't see where you're going with this.

↑ Guy_Named_Riggs wrote:I understand the theory fine. Though I have to wonder if you do

Cool, so you acknowledge the advantages to vigging a lurker? Because you've failed to refute any of the arguments that I've provided.

↑ Guy_Named_Riggs wrote:PEdit: Why do you think two of the three of us are scum? Or really, why do you think any of us are scum?

Read the thread.

↑ fuzzybutternut wrote:Uh, I was talking about GNR. He literally just came in the game, voted you, and all of a sudden he's scum.

Floundering scum is floundering.

What? My main suspicion was on his predecessor, baboon. And GNR has done nothing to change my opinion.

If your main suspicion is on his predecessor, and he hasn't done anything to change that, why aren't you voting him?

Because you are a higher priority vote.