Mafiascum.net

@Bulbazak: post 110 why didn't you respond to this post by egg?

In post 171, Bulbazak wrote:

Unvote

Vote Thenewearth

You would think that calling someone obv. town would be based on something more substantial than gut. If you check out Bo's reads, which you criticized, you'll notice he has a very definite reason for Klick.

You were one of the 3 scum reads I wanted to see more of, and what I'm seeing is not genuine.

Can you elaborate on this?

In post 206, Bulbazak wrote:Also seeing Icebox as more likely to be scum

. As you can see above, I inadvertently created a reaction test, and they didn't bite.

You need to expand on this. For obvious reasons. Having read 232: I still remain utterly confused.

Forgot to do this:

VOTE: Zachattack

-Rem

Hell, it wouldn't hurt.

VOTE: zachattack

I liked Icebox's Zachscum explanation.

I liked it too. I'm just not convinced yet.
Though it does make sense, i'd like to hear some more from him.

I'm not really against a Zach lynch, But an explanation would be nice

In post 278, thenewearth wrote:I'm not really against a Zach lynch, But an explanation would be nice

You aren't against a ?

Wagon, Lynch, Same thing

...

No it isn't.

Will get with this game again tonight or tomorrow.

VOTE: TNE

Was that a scum slip?

What scumslip?

Many apologies for not checking in in awhile, this has been an incredibly hectic week for me. However, I echo: what scum slip?

In post 275, Icebox wrote:@Bulbazak: post 110 why didn't you respond to this post by egg?

I didn't feel there was a need to respond to it. For the record, I didn't really care for the post, as it's AtE, and it just didn't feel genuine to me. However, I decided I wanted to see more of him and his actions independent of me before placing a vote, which was a good thing, as he graduated to being a town read.

In post 275, Icebox wrote:

In post 171, Bulbazak wrote:

Unvote

Vote Thenewearth

You would think that calling someone obv. town would be based on something more substantial than gut. If you check out Bo's reads, which you criticized, you'll notice he has a very definite reason for Klick.

You were one of the 3 scum reads I wanted to see more of, and what I'm seeing is not genuine.

Can you elaborate on this?

I had 4 scum reads early game: Mac, Egg, TNE, and you. I decided that I wanted to see more of Egg, TNE, and you, as the reads were still in the nullish area for different reasons, and I wanted to see some more interactions in general in order to refine my reads. Mac was a stronger town read, so I placed a vote on him. Any questions?

In post 275, Icebox wrote:

In post 206, Bulbazak wrote:Also seeing Icebox as more likely to be scum

. As you can see above, I inadvertently created a reaction test, and they didn't bite.

You need to expand on this. For obvious reasons. Having read 232: I still remain utterly confused.

Everybody who responded to the post was confused about the robot reference and asked about it, even if they commented on something else. You, however, didn't, and only commented on my calling you scum. It was a knee-jerk reaction. You essentially said, "I'm not scum! You're scum!", which of course sets off my scumdar immediately. You essentially panicked and gave yourself away.

In post 284, fuzzybutternut wrote:VOTE: TNE

Was that a scum slip?

Hmmm...

1. This is what bothers me. You said my post was forced, yet when egg did the same, you said nothing.
2. That's not what I wanted to know, you stated TNE did not respond how he was supposed to, explain how he reacted and why it was scummy. Unless you mean, that you didn't have anything, and were just pressing him.
3. There are 12 players in this game. How does 3 constitute "everyone." Your accusation requires no other response than "no" because that's what it amounts to.

-Rem But you guys can probably tell us apart by now.

As for the slip, not seeing it. Can you explain Fuzzy?

Actually. Why would Fuzzy vote someone and then ask people if it was a scum slip? Wouldn't you determine it was a scum slip first and then vote them once it determined?

In post 288, Icebox wrote:1. This is what bothers me. You said my post was forced, yet when egg did the same, you said nothing.
2. That's not what I wanted to know, you stated TNE did not respond how he was supposed to, explain how he reacted and why it was scummy. Unless you mean, that you didn't have anything, and were just pressing him.
3. There are 12 players in this game. How does 3 constitute "everyone." Your accusation requires no other response than "no" because that's what it amounts to.

1. They are not the same. You reacted badly to a post and I called you out on it. Egg gave an explanation of a previous action, which had nothing to do with him OMGUSing on somebody. And btw, I never said your post was "forced", I said it was a knee-jerk reaction to being called scum.

2. I never said that. I said that his post didn't feel genuine, which means exactly that, not real. It's really not something that can be quantified, but it's still a good tool when hunting scum.

3. I said "everybody who responded to the post", of which there were only 3. I was absolutely correct in what I said.

Your misrep attempts are noted.

1. You said my first post was forced.
2. Theory. That discussion goes no where.
3. Okay. Thanks for clarifying.

Misrep attempts? Why would I ask you for clarification if I was trying to misrep you. -_-) I wouldn't ask you if I was.

Though you aren't absolutely correct in what you accused me of.

Similarly, while you have noted my "misrepping attempts" I will have noted your defensiveness and your feeling threatened at being pressed to reveal your opinions. Isn't that annoying? Because you can't respond to it, because there's no way to prove it either way until the game ends. *sigh*

-Rem

Oh, that's what you meant. What I meant was that you were trying too hard when answering that post to appear town. Real townies don't go about calling themselves town every 20 sec (I hardly do so at all, mainly because I know my alignment, and I don't care if you do or not.).

I've already responded to that. I don't see the egg town. He is #2 as far as calling himself town all the time.

-Rem

In post 278, thenewearth wrote:I'm not really against a Zach lynch, But an explanation would be nice

Town would want an explanation before the lynch.

In post 278, thenewearth wrote:I'm not really against a Zach lynch,

But an explanation would be nice

In post 296, fuzzybutternut wrote:

In post 278, thenewearth wrote:I'm not really against a Zach lynch, But an explanation would be nice

Town would want an explanation before the lynch.

That could just as easily be faked as scum.

Bulb, Fuzzy called TNE for that remark, not town.

It's also not a scum slip. But it's suspicious. Zach's barely done anything and he thinks his lynch won't bother him? And an explanation would be ?

That makes it sounds like you don't care if you get the explanation or not, TNE.

Wagons and lynches are not the same thing. You shouldn't confuse them that easily.