Mafiascum.net

Since I'm new to forum mafia, if someone hammers without letting the other person adequately defend themselves, is it autoscum?

It's not autoscum, but it's auto-"WTF was that for VOTEZ!!!"

@TMTOLBTWNTOF
Not autoscum, but it may be a scum tell.
Here's an example from my last game (a newbie game)
http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 4#p4902864
there were 4 town and 1 scum left. I was town and at L-1. one of our townies quickhammered me. in fact it was even worse, said townie made up a (completely fake) excuse to unvote me, in order to let someone else put me at L-1 so he could quickhammer. I still don't know what he was thinking. so it was 2 town to 1 scum next day. said townie had already been suspicious, the hammer was suspicious, anyway we voted the wrong person and lost. so in general, don't quickhammer without a good reason.

@patzer: Lol Chrimi

Can't take all the credit for that scum win, now can I?

In post 279, Does Bo Know wrote:@patzer: Lol Chrimi

Can't take all the credit for that scum win, now can I?

Nope, you did well, but if it hadn't been for Chrimi we'd have at least had a better chance of winning. hypothetical situation: Chrimi hadn't done that, we lynch him, then we might have caught you in LyLo. Not that likely, but possible. And more likely than us not lynching Chrimi the way the game turned out.

On the subject of your scum win, I noticed a big similarity between this one and that one. There nobody suspected you of being scum and you were scum, here nobody has suspected you of being scum. This must mean you are scum.

ISO'd Patzer just now, I don't like him. A lot of his posts have been fluffed with meta stuff. Ironically, the one thing he's worried about being called scum for, isn't a reason I think he may be scum. We can throw him in my scum pile.

In post 263, Majiffy wrote:

In post 259, anorway wrote:Yeah, that was kinda meant to happen.

You intended to have links going to the wrong places?

No, of course not. But I was just testing it, so errors was going to occur no matter what.

In post 281, Does Bo Know wrote:the one thing he's worried about being called scum for

What is this one thing?

Bo, here's my read on you.



@Patzer, and Chrimi is a she, not a he.

In post 283, patzer wrote:

In post 281, Does Bo Know wrote:the one thing he's worried about being called scum for

What is this one thing?

I think Bo means the "no reads" thing.

In post 285, anorway wrote:

In post 283, patzer wrote:

In post 281, Does Bo Know wrote:the one thing he's worried about being called scum for

What is this one thing?

I think Bo means the "no reads" thing.

I see. Well if it isn't that I can't think of any reason why I have been scummy. I'd be interested in seeing some examples of my posts that Bo thought were scummy.

In post 284, anorway wrote:@Patzer, and Chrimi is a she, not a he.

Whoops. Well, she was a he when she first joined Newbie 1353, which did make me confused.

@anorway: I never even though PhD could be scum until 66. In 95 (well actually 97) I let him slide because of his reactions.

Also I get links right because I preview my post like billions of times and make sure my tags are always right.

@patzer I may show you examples later.

I previewed 255 like a gazillion times, but it still ended really wrong though. I think the solution is to not put hashtags.

And I just saw your 89, and I think I missed that for some reason.

Quite interesting i didn't know about that i usually used url tags with the post links' full link

@anoway: I'd like to mention that my "pressure-to-get-wagons" thing isn't very scumtell-y of me. I did say early this game that I was hoping the wagons would start giving us something, right?

And I'll try to note Anorway's 255 for later, depending on how the rest of this day goes.

VOTE: Patzer

C'mon DBK.

Ehhhhhhh

I don't wanna.

PhD and Sakura are my only vote choices ATM.

Well i'm lost at the momment, so i'd like to ask a question to all people voting me. Is there at present, still any reason why you think I'm scum? and if so what is said reason?

And to the people not voting me that think i'm scum, why are they voting someone else instead of me? do they look more scum? why? why do i look scum to you?

Basically, TMT's 153 and 154 highlight most everything. And the super OMGUS on TMT later.

Then I ask you, why is jumping on a wagon bad when you are doing the same exact thing, when you voted me?
What is this thing about circular logic? I thought I explained that already?
So am I not supposed to vote someone voting me even if I think they are scum? that doesn't make much sense.

Your reasons were weaker than mine for joining your wagon.

I need to go back and check again to see your vote on TMT but from what I remember it didn't look very sincere.

My reasons for voting him is that him and PhD seem to be tunneling on me as no matter what I do or explain they still see me as scum. But PhD is new so it's quite possible he's trying to go with the flow, while TMT already has experience so I believe he's more likely to be scum.