Mafiascum.net

Let me know if I need to start signing my posts.

In post 275, Rift Adrift wrote:Let me know if I need to start signing my posts.

I absolutely promise to ignore anyone asking me to sign my posts.

I also promise to ignore any scumflailing from BRO when we secretly lynch him Day 3 after not self-destructing Night 2.

Or.

We could get a scumflip off of BROseidon today.

Then tomorrow, we nuke T S O or Stevie.

Sounds like a better plan to me.

In post 277, Ankamius wrote:Or.

We could get a scumflip off of BROseidon today.

Then tomorrow, we nuke T S O or Stevie.

Sounds like a better plan to me.

I am happy that you are so eager to bus your buddies.

All in good time, my pretty.

lol

In post 279, Ankamius wrote:lol

I would like to start a poll. The question:
What should I reply to this post with?

Possible choices:
"DIESCUMDIE"
"Weak."
"I'LL GET YOU MY PRETTY, AND YOUR LITTLE DOG TOO"
"unvote, vote: Ankamius"
Various assorted gifs.
All of the above.

Poll will close in (expired on 2013-06-15 00:00:00)

All of the above
VOTE: Ankamius

Yes, sheep the slot that is voting me for literally one post and has spent half his ISO doing nothing but tunneling me for it while giving virtually no other reads worth anything.

Bravo, TIP. Bravo.

This is even after the only thing you've ever said about me was stating I was a town read AFTER the scum read on me was explained. That vote is literally retarded.

In post 198, Nero wrote:good work comrades, pile the votes on stevie. if required, i will hardclaim my role to get him lynched.

Just pointing out while I read the rest of the pages how retarded this post is.

Butthurt much?

Butthurt over what?

ISO'd Ank. Don't see anything scummy and I don't get the wagon on him at all.

That was directed at Ank, but I guess it applies to you as well. You have many voters. You seem to be popular. So you use the "retarded" excuse instead of addressing what has been thrown at you.

You're not reading the thread if you think I haven't addressed what was thrown at me.

In post 250, Ankamius wrote:Also, finally looked at Stevie. Scumread.

What do you think of Ank's read on you, Stevie?

Err, 287 was at Stevie, pretty clear

In post 282, Ankamius wrote:Yes, sheep the slot that is voting me for literally one post and has spent half his ISO doing nothing but tunneling me for it while giving virtually no other reads worth anything.

Bravo, TIP. Bravo.

This is even after the only thing you've ever said about me was stating I was a town read AFTER the scum read on me was explained. That vote is literally retarded.

Why hello there. Most of that ISO is mine.

I am not a he.

"while giving virtually no other reads worth anything"

That just might be sig-worthy.

In post 287, TheIrishPope wrote:That was directed at Ank, but I guess it applies to you as well. You have many voters. You seem to be popular. So you use the "retarded" excuse instead of addressing what has been thrown at you.

I addressed what was thrown at me. Scum softclaiming some BS when we STARTED ON A DAY! That is straight retarded.

PEDIT: @TiP well I think he's wrong, obviously....I like his other scumreads though.

You he's wrong? lolwut

In post 284, TheIrishPope wrote:Butthurt much?

Really annoyed, yes.

In post 293, TheIrishPope wrote:You

think

he's wrong? lolwut

is this what qualifies as analysis on this site these days?

I didn't say it was of substance
But your latest post worries me

In post 238, Zdenek wrote:Could everyone just vote Stevie. Guy's flipping scum.

What happened to your tunnel on me? Do you think that Stevie and I could be scum together?

In post 244, Calcifer wrote:It's likely this is from a difference in site meta as opposed to any sort of real scum motivation. Do you really think that he thinks he can suddenly convince us to drop townreads forever? No.

I didn't realize that Stevie was coming from another site. Will reevaluate him with this in mind.

In post 262, Ankamius wrote:I mean, I agree that the plan was terrible (which I've already said a couple times), but this explanation of it is just plain bad. The part directly before it WOULD set up a connection, since scum trying hard enough to set up a specific townie being wagoned first can bite them in the ass later. Naturally town are just going to put whoever the fuck they want in the list too, since there's literally no information outside of that plan's existence at all that would change the lists.

The connections would be invalid because scum can tailor them based on statistical blips in how town does shit. It creates WIFOM that is scum-controlled.

In post 262, Ankamius wrote:I can easily see scum doing this. I've done something similar in a recent scum game. I was the first wagon of the game and I self-voted because it was safer than responding normally; it has a higher chance of appearing scum in a reaction test.

Basically, scum paranoia.

Or me being sarcastic that nobody was actually presenting a case on me.

In post 270, Brian Hollywood wrote:Hola I'm still here.

Vote: TheIrishPope

Simply bc it sounded like a good idea at the time.

Post something useful.

In post 286, StevieT92 wrote:ISO'd Ank. Don't see anything scummy and I don't get the wagon on him at all.

What do you think of Nacho and ffery's arguments?

Reread Steve with the consideration that he comes from another site meta and I don't like his reaction to pressure. His response has been OMGUS and a bunch of weak posts. His scumhunting is weak.

Nero is irking me but I don't think he's scum. He's in the null-town range for me. TSO's case is shit, but I feel like it's null unless one of the people who was under pressure when he posted it (letters, stevie, or nero) flip scum, in which case I'll definitely want to pressure TSO. Also, TSO has done jack for providing anything except for his case. Like Zdenek's response to TSO's case.

Ank's case on me is shit but the shit case and tunneling is null. At least he's trying to scumhunt despite being under pressure, which is more than can be said for Stevie.

In post 263, TheIrishPope wrote:Alright, so you all think I'm Town. That's good. I think we should lynch Stevie.
VOTE: Stevie
Whoever doesn't vote Stevie is either scum or a tree stump

Stevie is town, he acts with consistency, and I'm pretty sure there is scum on his wagon right now

In post 274, Rift Adrift wrote:We recommend you not lynch Nero, TIP.

Nero I agree with. TIP, sure.

In post 257, Rift Adrift wrote:I guess it wasn't persuasive.

Trust me.