In post 279, Skullduggery wrote:Belisarius has not pushed a case of any sort yet. I don't understand why he's being lumped in with the other two.
Because I supported wayne, and never said outright that my initial vote was for high word count:content ratio. She could be forgiven for thinking that I was sheeping wayne, and since I voted first I could only sheep wayne if I knew in advance what he'd do, like scum that planned this shit ahead on N0. Somehow.
No, lumping me in with wayne was not scummy. Her reaction to the wagon, however,
was
. I also don't like how her first vote on wayne, although supposedly in agreement with SD's logic, was written to look like she was sheeping Jason and then the story later changes to be supporting SD. If you look at the whole post in context:
In post 28, Sakura Hana wrote:Looks like he also has to rhyme or sound like a song or something in addition to capitalizing the last word, also I agree with that vote
[post=waynegg]waynegg[/post]
Why do I feel like i'm the only Normal person here?
So "Looks like he also has to rhyme or sound like a song ...." is clearly talking about Jason, and the clause "also I agree with
that vote
" (emphasis mine) is
in the same sentence
as her comment on Jason's post restriction, posted immediately after Jason's vote, and makes no reference to SD. She doesn't say she agrees with any reasoning, she says she agrees with
that vote
. Devoid of any other context, one would expect to believe "that vote" would refer to the vote immediately beforehand (Jason's), and in context it's part of a sentence that is talking about Jason. Both tell us she's talking about Jason's vote.
People say what they mean, even when they don't mean to. SH was piling onto Jason's vote, not SD's, or she would have said "I agree with SD's reasoning," most likely in a separate sentence from talking about Jason.
There. Now I've made a case.