Mafiascum.net

In post 274, Haschel Cedricson wrote:

In post 271, ac1983fan wrote:@Guyett it's called a gambit / reaction test. Not sure that that is really considered lying but ok.

What was the gambit here? What reactions were you looking for?

the gambit was acting like I was confident that someone was scum and seeing what would happen from that
I was looking for the reactionary reactions (i.e. none in particular)

First off

In post 276, ac1983fan wrote:

In post 274, Haschel Cedricson wrote:

In post 271, ac1983fan wrote:@Guyett it's called a gambit / reaction test. Not sure that that is really considered lying but ok.

What was the gambit here? What reactions were you looking for?

the gambit was acting like I was confident that someone was scum and seeing what would happen from that
I was looking for the reactionary reactions (i.e. none in particular)

Secondly, why would this garner anything at all?

In post 276, ac1983fan wrote:

In post 274, Haschel Cedricson wrote:

In post 271, ac1983fan wrote:@Guyett it's called a gambit / reaction test. Not sure that that is really considered lying but ok.

What was the gambit here? What reactions were you looking for?

the gambit was acting like I was confident that someone was scum and seeing what would happen from that
I was looking for the reactionary reactions (i.e. none in particular)

What a load of bullshit. Sheep me ppl

In post 277, MafiaSSK wrote:First off

Unvote

In post 276, ac1983fan wrote:

In post 274, Haschel Cedricson wrote:

In post 271, ac1983fan wrote:@Guyett it's called a gambit / reaction test. Not sure that that is really considered lying but ok.

What was the gambit here? What reactions were you looking for?

the gambit was acting like I was confident that someone was scum and seeing what would happen from that
I was looking for the reactionary reactions (i.e. none in particular)

Secondly, why would this garner anything at all?

Because it was a thing
and usually things cause reactions

Alright, what notable reactions did you see?

In post 280, Haschel Cedricson wrote:Alright, what notable reactions did you see?

'Testing for reactions' is always a codeword for 'i need to justify shitposting'. Its not a scum tell, though, I use the excuse all the time as both alignments.

In post 281, Natirasha wrote:

In post 280, Haschel Cedricson wrote:Alright, what notable reactions did you see?

'Testing for reactions' is always a codeword for 'i need to justify shitposting'. Its not a scum tell, though, I use the excuse all the time as both alignments.

VOTE: acfan

Also adding HC to the townlist.

Current townlist
(Me, Who, Natirasha, his mason buddy, Guyett, HC)

What exactly makes HC town, GIF?

In post 280, Haschel Cedricson wrote:Alright, what notable reactions did you see?

This.

Um, okay...

It might look like nothing context-wise, but this post just oozes town, and in perfect timing too.

In post 280, Haschel Cedricson wrote:Alright, what notable reactions did you see?

Guyett basically tried to just be all like, oh give reasons why he is scum
And then just says "oh there is zero scumhunting in his iso k i will vote him"
but that is a terrible reason for voting when day 1 started less than a week ago because like
how much scumhunting do you really expect players to have accomplished by that point?
Especially when it is wayyy more fun to derp around :3
So it seems like he is scum trying to push easy mislynches (like trying to push me being scum for my claims, then going on gaiden because hey it's a good way to get towncred if this ac guy who is town is so sure about this, then pushing me as scum for "lying")

Anyway Guyett is probably scum imho and votes on me are terribad k

He's a newb. Does that help?

I'll look through this later. Laziness is my forte.

In post 288, GuyInFreezer wrote:He's a newb. Does that help?

if anything that just makes him scummier

I recommend looking through the game I linked, ac. He did the same super derpy play there and was unequivocally town.

I can confirm GIF's result on Who. I've received a PM on Friday 12pm (EST) (that should have been sent straight after he sent it to GIF) which shows GIF's pm to the mod and the mod's response. It's exactly as he said it.

I was trying to get a cop investigation. Not whatever you would call this. My dream was along the lines of "searching in the dark. find spotlight. see GIF"

Oh great. This game is pretty insane.

@safety was it only that pm or have there been others?

Why wasn't that told earlier?

So either SD and GiF are scum together and town together neat

In post 294, Guyett wrote:@safety was it only that pm or have there been others?

I've only received one pm from the mod which has had any information in it and was labelled 'Dream Result'.

In post 295, MafiaSSK wrote:Why wasn't that told earlier?

What do you mean? I posted that I got the information when I read it. Why didn't Zaicon give me that info earlier?

In post 296, ac1983fan wrote:So either SD and GiF are scum together and town together neat

Although from my POV, it doesn't clear GIF's alignment, just what he did last night. But the important thing is that Who is clear.

So how exactly does this work then? Did you dream that you could spy on GiF's dream?
Also GiF was really poular lol

I am completely clear unless all 3 of us are scum, in which case that strategy would be extremely risky. Also, any investigation/flip of GiF or SD will completely clear me. Also, given how clear I am I'm just going to commute/BPize myself from now on if I can.

GiF is more town from this, but not completely clear. I see no reason why scum would actually perform that night action when lying would accomplish the same thing. WIFOM is possible, but he is very likely to be town.