Thoughts:
I don't think Mala is scum.
I don't think penguin is scum, but most of all, penguin is being more useful than most of you. I'd policy not-lynch her.
I don't want to vote pirate mollie
because I hate her
and voting out of emotion gets me lynched.
Arc is another possible vote.
Shos posting the roman guy and a big x is meaning that he is not roman, but instead an early scot, and so we should all vote him for being an anachronism.
have to get dressed & to the bus in ten minutes for school. two pages left to read.
In post 276, Wisdom wrote:Nah, that was a stupid thing for penguin to say. Mirari's post was null.
Also, the buddying here.
Posted: Mon Dec 02, 2013 8:03 am
by Wisdom
What buddying? And explain how anything penguin has said was useful in any way.
Posted: Mon Dec 02, 2013 8:06 am
by penguin_alien
In post 273, Desperado wrote:@ Penguin: Uh...no? I was coaching you to play less like WWE and more like Calvin and Hobbes.
Sorry, I was thinking of this:
In post 4487, Desperado wrote:PA is definitely playing different in this game. In WWE, PA never addressed someone individually unless it was to implicate them as scum.
In contrast, ISO her in this game and you see a lot of interactions initiated by her that never materialize into scum reads.
(Snipped for length)
If I based my read solely on this I would have PA as town this game.
Thoughts:
I don't think Mala is scum.
I don't think penguin is scum, but most of all, penguin is being more useful than most of you. I'd policy not-lynch her.
I don't want to vote pirate mollie
because I hate her
and voting out of emotion gets me lynched.
Arc is another possible vote.
Shos posting the roman guy and a big x is meaning that he is not roman, but instead an early scot, and so we should all vote him for being an anachronism.
have to get dressed & to the bus in ten minutes for school. two pages left to read.
Why were you thinking of that when I specifically said I coached you on that in Castle?
Posted: Mon Dec 02, 2013 8:17 am
by penguin_alien
Because I remembered finding the coaching ironic but I couldn't say anything due to the NY 164 game being ongoing.
Posted: Mon Dec 02, 2013 8:18 am
by ooba
Spoiler: Post 3.9
In post 284, penguin_alien wrote:I'll assume that's 'heresy' although now that I'm on my tablet I'll add that it's annoying not to be able to see the whole pic in the thread too.
I actually posted the images in spoiler tags because it would be irritating to have them load up every time you browse from a mobile device and need to scroll through them.
Posted: Mon Dec 02, 2013 8:21 am
by Grimgroove
I like the visual aspect of the pictures you post, especially seeing my avatar in a little circle has a strangely appealing effect.
But it doesn't make interacting with you, or about you, easy so I'd prefer a shift to more normal modes of communication.
In post 110, Malakittens wrote:78 isn't too long, really Shos? It's about the same size as your catch up.
Wisdom - his ISO the last few posts by him are reading as defensive. I can quote them if you like, but for me it makes me lean town on him.
I'm not criticizing the size of your post. I'm criticizing its content. having so many reads so quickly, that's a real feat. I had like, one, and it was weak.
this is a dumb tell that never works ever
In post 121, pirate mollie wrote:I was mostly trolling him and pushing his buttons and while I get why arc and mebbe even mala followed my push cos they he and I are pretty good friends and sometimes nacho can be a blank slate that is best observed through other people's eyes when all you see is an empty canvas but i find your push to be weird.
I agree.
In post 126, Whiskers wrote:I don't think he was being defensive either. My quote that made me think he was trying to play to that "relative tell" was "NO NO NO NO NO."
That's not a real defence. It's not real defensiveness. But is it "screaming his little head off"?
So I'm not trying to mimic town based on what I think townies should do, but instead am trying to mimic town based on what town-Wisdom would do?
I haven't even tunneled on you yet, so the fact you're making a huge deal out of it seems fake to me.
But sure, you're free to replace out any time. You know such threats don't work on me anyway.
The bolded is very much true.
@matt 157: why is mala town?
I am right in 158, and @159 wisdom: I'm not trying to discredit anyone; I'm wondering if these are reads 'just to have reads', or are those real reads coming from town. I see no reason for that read and entirely disagree with its existence. the fact that mollie is an early townread doesn't make her conftown.
I like whiskers' posts here. @164 tho - not necessarily. as town I do that to spot fails in the scums' fakeclaim if such is invented and not given. as scum I do it too, jsut to make perfect fakeclaims. usually it works - sometimes I get shat up by maestro... >_>
@165.
the first part with des - as I said I don't even understand dez's post so I'm totally not following.
regarding the second part - I don't get it, do you agree or not that it is a towntell? I think that it is. I thought that I'd invented that in oen of my last games - don't remember where - but I'd used it once and it worked, at least. That's not a something mainstream, as in, taht you'd expect people to actually follow an idea of 'if he says that being a horse is town and then bees( ) a horse then he is town', so I don't see scum being super cunning and plan it all ahead..
mollie explain your vote on 168 plzx
@mirari post 170: what made you decide that if nacho is scum then wisdom isn't??? that's liek totally out of the blue.
GG's 174 is a very good post.
next page.
Posted: Mon Dec 02, 2013 10:31 am
by shos
GG's 177: there's a difference between these two quotes - mala and nacho. both are not so bad imo. nacho's case is practically RVS so it's really uninteresting, not everything you do in RVS really has a purpose at first. mala's case is actually a legit question: why a person treats another differently than two others?
wow 188 is really bad
191 too. I don't remember even what my own alignment was in les mis, and I'm not reading you on gut here. and penguin?? the hell?
and see, GG, this is the kind of posts that you are actually right about. no reason at all to post stuff like this:
In post 188, Malakittens wrote:I have a decent way of reading pen. The more she doesn't post the more of a chance she's scum. So yes my vote was to bait her into posting (which worked the first time)
In post 193, Malakittens wrote:
It's not the lack of activity that's making me lean scum on her. It's the fact she appeared right after I voted for her that makes me really lean scum on her.
Hmm, it's not what you said before.
I want to see how your 1v1 with Penguin plays out when she gets here. But I don't see you initializing the conversation with her. Apart from that empty vote and a tongue-in-cheek comment that you'll leave that vote there I haven't seen any concrete effort from your side to spur Penguin into action.