3dice wrote:Maybe not necessarily caught someone with it, but it has led to either a scummy reaction from them or town reaction, which has either led to the pursuit of their lunch or me backing off.
im reading into this interaction more and im really not seeing how maxous is being a hypocrite here.
to me it seems like hes saying that the majority of what spiff is doing comes across as him starting from a conclusion and working backwards, and despite agreeing that a point is valid, it doesnt discredit the rest of what maxous is saying and to boil down everything hes saying into "this is hypocritical!" comes across as reductive in a way i dont like.
talk to me about why maxous discredits his own case on spiff if hes scum whos grasping at straws.
Maxous's TLDR says that it appears Spiffeh is just trying to paint Itlepip as scum rather than determine his alignment. Spiffeh tells Maxous his main, (and from what I read)only point against Itlepip, and Maxous believes it is a good point. I don't think it makes sense to believe the only point on the wagon is good, and still believe it's only goal is to paint someone else as scum.
Posted: Sat Oct 31, 2015 7:17 am
by Spiffeh
Mario do you have any other reads?
3dice do you think it's likely scum would claim miller in their first post?
pocket wrote:erm...I naked vote all of the time? both of you shld know that.
it seems lazy.
pocket wrote:and notty is fine, does give you a way to tell us apart? then why are you complaining
because gimmicks like the one notty is using are annoying to decipher and are easy for scum to hide behind.
there is a method to my madness, as you well know!
so...did you look at my most recent scum game?
Posted: Sat Oct 31, 2015 7:38 am
by CharlotteBebe
yup!
its part of why i dont like your play thus far!
Posted: Sat Oct 31, 2015 7:39 am
by Spiffeh
CB I miss our back and forth
Posted: Sat Oct 31, 2015 7:43 am
by CharlotteBebe
i'll come back to it when i feel like following in-depth points that i dont feel strongly about.
slightly hungover today.
Posted: Sat Oct 31, 2015 8:08 am
by PocketFullofSunshine
↑CharlotteBebe wrote:yup!
its part of why i dont like your play thus far!
this tells me nothing
you are complaining that I naked voted when i have pretty much been doing that ever since I joined outside of rome. so your reason to scumread me seems fabricated.
do you think scum!notty or town!notty is more likely make a drastic change in his posting style? cos that sort of defeats the purpose of blending in yeah?
Posted: Sat Oct 31, 2015 8:10 am
by PocketFullofSunshine
In my battalion, such language is commonplace.
Maybe it could be a misunderstanding, but where my fealties lie I have not obscured.
Posted: Sat Oct 31, 2015 8:12 am
by CharlotteBebe
complaining that youre naked voting =/= me finding your play thus far plausibly coming from the same thread as the scumgame you linked.
i havent really articulated my thoughts there yet nor do i find them particularly compelling.
and the gimmick really isnt alignment indicative, im saying that its arguably a lot easier for scum to hide behind that kind of tactic, not that notty chose to use that tactic as scum.
Posted: Sat Oct 31, 2015 8:15 am
by CharlotteBebe
basically i find it questionable that i have so many things that you could be picking at right now.
youre picking at my response to you, but thats about it.
in ff it seemed like you did a similar thing with titus where you pushed her without really trying to figure her out.
in other games ive seen you ask scumreads questions.
where this reaction now is similar to what ive seen there, it seems reactionary, rather than proactive.
but im getting way too wordy and i kind of want to stop talking.
Posted: Sat Oct 31, 2015 8:17 am
by Spiffeh
Zexion is scum.
Discuss.
Posted: Sat Oct 31, 2015 8:21 am
by Spiffeh
Wagons need to happen and they are not.
I blame everyone not sheeping me.
Posted: Sat Oct 31, 2015 9:32 am
by PocketFullofSunshine
↑CharlotteBebe wrote:complaining that youre naked voting =/= me finding your play thus far plausibly coming from the same thread as the scumgame you linked.
i havent really articulated my thoughts there yet nor do i find them particularly compelling.
and the gimmick really isnt alignment indicative, im saying that its arguably a lot easier for scum to hide behind that kind of tactic, not that notty chose to use that tactic as scum.
so you read ALL 225 pages of the game I linked enough to try to drop a meta read?
tell me, what were my finer moments?
*cough BULLSHIT*
also I have naked voted in every single game I have been in since I have joined this site so in every game we have played together you shld be able to easily check.
if notty posting in Sir Lord Speak is not alignment indicative then why were you trying to paint him as scum for doing it?
can we lynch bebe now plz
Posted: Sat Oct 31, 2015 9:36 am
by PocketFullofSunshine
Posted: Sat Oct 31, 2015 9:41 am
by CharlotteBebe
wow yeah cause i claimed to read all of it.
are you intentionally trying to misrep me?
i havent said youre scum.
im just making a point that nothing either of you have done is reading as particularly town and it makes me wary
are you that incapable of reading into words that are coming out of my mouth?
fucking christ.
Posted: Sat Oct 31, 2015 9:43 am
by CharlotteBebe
like literally nothing youve done screams "i am trying to figure anything out right now" youre just waving big flashy bullshit around like it means something when you havent laid any groundwork for even pretending that youre actually trying to figure out which side of the alignment spectrum im on here.
Posted: Sat Oct 31, 2015 9:43 am
by CharlotteBebe
man i seriously hope youre scum right now.
because i'll be really fucking disappointed in you if you actually believe anything you just said.
Posted: Sat Oct 31, 2015 9:46 am
by CharlotteBebe
pocket wrote:if notty posting in Sir Lord Speak is not alignment indicative then why were you trying to paint him as scum for doing it?
like fucking seriously where did i do this.
please.
tell me.
im waiting.
what were my finer moments?