Mafiascum.net

Yeah Yeah I'm here

↑ Lucky2u wrote:You seem to be assuming I was accusing you of being scum. I'm assuming you're being lazy.

I'm accusing you of ingenuine scumhunting. What did you expect to gain from calling me lazy?

↑ hi im Yakko wrote:I love flubbers response dude "reading is fundamental" holy shit dude. He doesn't realize we can read and are noticing that he has nothing. Lmao

Flubber you scum brah?

Considering I just said I, had no opinions on the thread to turn around and be asked if I have any opinions on the thread uhhh Yeah.

Also yes I am scum

↑ Davsto wrote:So there is a possibility of him being scum. Dammit.

shocker

↑ Klazam wrote:im considering this, and honestly,

if diego's town

, we have this game well in the bag- 5 votes between

diego and hermmm

. If we go to night, and all

protective roles

choose randomly between both of them, then i dont think that scum can win outside of a mislynch on diego, which could be incredibly hard to pull off.

Look at all those awful, awful conditions.

Explain, dram.

Red is a reasonable if-statement, and i've said i think its true, orange isnt a condition at all, and pink is me saying that so that scum now have to decide risk losing out on a nightkill or go elsewhere for the safe kill. It doesnt ha e to be true- no protective roles in the game is very possible, but it still should influence scum, to the point where theyre likely to shoot elsewhere, if the majority of the town thinks that protective roles should target diego/hermm. Which is a very positive thing because it leaves 5 votes in the hands of town.

Whats so awful about those

↑ Flubbernugget wrote:

↑ hi im Yakko wrote:I love flubbers response dude "reading is fundamental" holy shit dude. He doesn't realize we can read and are noticing that he has nothing. Lmao

Flubber you scum brah?

Considering I just said I, had no opinions on the thread to turn around and be asked if I have any opinions on the thread uhhh Yeah.

Also yes I am scum

VOTE: flubber cool

Still like my Yakko vote. Too much wagon hopping, and not useful to town at all.

Not lynching Diego today, because he is a forced kill from scum if actually town (and if he is scum he'll be killed from another scum faction anyway).

↑ Skybird wrote:Not sure which way to go on Diego. It would be great to have a town quad voter but if he's scum, ugh.

I didn't like his post where he stated he was going to build a town block, like he was encouraging us to believe him to be town.

VOTE: Diego

If you're not sure which way to go, then why did you place a vote in the same post?

dramonic wrote:

↑ Davsto wrote:So there is a possibility of him being scum. Dammit.

shocker

↑ Klazam wrote:im considering this, and honestly,

if diego's town

, we have this game well in the bag- 5 votes between

diego and hermmm

. If we go to night, and all

protective roles

choose randomly between both of them, then i dont think that scum can win outside of a mislynch on diego, which could be incredibly hard to pull off.

Look at all those awful, awful conditions.

How is "diego and hermmmm" a condition?

Would you have rather my vote go to you SirCakez?

If he is a scum quad voter, he is too dangerous to keep in the game. That's why I voted.

What a cowardly reason.

How the hell is that snide comment productive?

Back at you :p

↑ Skybird wrote:Would you have rather my vote go to you SirCakez?

If he is a scum quad voter,

he is too dangerous to keep in the game. That's why I voted.

Do you actually believe he is scum though?

↑ Klazam wrote:Red is a reasonable if-statement,

It's a pretty big if. He plays like scum, he smells like scum, his role is scummy, but hey, IF HE IS TOWN YA KNOW!

orange isnt a condition at all

If you want diego and Herm to control the gamestate, which is also a pretty big if.

pink is me saying that so that scum now have to decide risk losing out on a nightkill or go elsewhere for the safe kill.

IF we have a valid protective role, IF that protector is even interested in Diego/Herm. IF this weren't GIM

It still should influence scum, to the point where theyre likely to shoot elsewhere

If scum is even worried about diego.

if the majority of the town thinks that protective roles should target diego/hermm.

If the majority of the town is a credible source

Which is a very positive thing because it leaves 5 votes in the hands of town.

If the votes are used intelligently.

You could have infinite votes, if they're constantly on the wrong people it's just mislynching for scum without them getting their hands dirty.

Dram is right. I think I would eventually policy lynch a innocent child, master-scumhunter quad voter eventually. That role as any alignment can majorly help scum. One wrong read and whole game is lost.

Huh.

I see now.

But is this a valid d1 lynch? Because it kind of generates no information, due to-according to you- both scum and town has reason to lynch him, meaning that the day ends up a bit of a waste?

wait no

it doesnt make sense

thinking about it in the shower- scum has the most to gain from pushing through a mislynch on a town quadvoter.

VOTE: dram

I have to disagree with you there. I'm not seeing Dram as scum right now.

↑ Klazam wrote:wait no

it doesnt make sense

thinking about it in the shower- scum has the most to gain from pushing through a mislynch on a town quadvoter.

VOTE: dram

you need to take another shower.

Merry Christmas everyone!

Merry Christmas all!

Since I am stuck at my parents with nothing but a laptop, here comes my post spam of catch up posts!

It's always nice to see a town Davsto. You may have something on sircakez here, but how do you feel about the fact that one of your scum reads is scum reading the other (klazam)? Are you operating under the assumption that they are opposed scum to each other if both your reads are right?

↑ SirCakez wrote:The Vedith wagon doesn't exist anymore. If I wanted to vote on an "easy" wagon, then why didn't I vote for Diego or Lucky?
And I already gave an explanation for the Vedith wagon hop on and hop off in 204 and 217

Was I considered an easy wagon at any point in this game?

↑ HERRMMMMM wrote:ika's flub vote was shit. the guy is just naturally scummy, I'm not sure why but he is the scummiest player on this site no matter what.

VOTE: diego

this is where we should go, I think. Quad voter is dangerous as fuck, and he comes off as scummy.

I'm going to use this quote from the IC to discuss my feelings on the Diego situation lately. My initial thought was only scum would push the Diego wagon, since essentially the wagon exists because his ROLE is powerful, NOT that he has done anything scummy, just that his ROLE his powerful. Since our IC seems to also be afraid of it, I guess I can't use it as alignment indictive to read those on the Diego wagon. I have moved my read on Diego over to leaning town for the moment. I think scum would have handled this power differently day 1. I will also ask that we don't lynch Diego based on fear of his power.

↑ Klazam wrote:Lucky- your "look, everyone's busy, lets get someone lynched and go to night before christmas"-(i dont care who youre talking about here, the fact that you wanted it to be me is immaterial) i think this is a horribly lazy push, trying to find a easy wagon to push through, espically since a lot of players has expressed suspicion of me. That post reeks of lazy scum looking for easy way to get night, to me.

It's easy because your scum. The part in parenthesis clarifying that you'd feel this way regardless if it was you or not is a scum thing to say, as you are essentially saying "this totally isn't a omgus read guys, I really feel this way". should have left it out.