Posted: Mon Jun 06, 2016 11:10 pm
Sick I don't think you ever actually voted vandit so they're technically at L-3
There's no rules against this in general (although there is a privacy setting to counter it). I can't share my thoughts on it until after the game, unfortunately.
Do you think Vandit's 'flamey' behavior is scummy or that that's just their personality?In post 277, F-oh-ex wrote:smh my vote was to put a lil' pressure on sad, it was 2nd vote out of 5? Rask is just hardcore tunnelling and trying to create connections where there are none. Nice try, bud.
Zyf's a townread now, that post-hammer reaction felt really genuine and I don't see it being faked so well on spot.
Also, if I appeared so overwhelmingly scummy to you, why did you not vote me and continue your vote on Sad?In post 277, F-oh-ex wrote:smh my vote was to put a lil' pressure on sad, it was 2nd vote out of 5? Rask is just hardcore tunnelling and trying to create connections where there are none. Nice try, bud.
Zyf's a townread now, that post-hammer reaction felt really genuine and I don't see it being faked so well on spot.
Harassment of an individual player is NOT permitted. While this is a competitive game, no personal attacks will be tolerated.
It's L-2. It takes 4 to lynch.In post 275, Zyf wrote:Sick I don't think you ever actually voted vandit so they're technically at L-3
Ok.In post 283, Raskolnikov wrote:Ugh that hammer.
Ranger and sad both flipping town throws most of my theory out the window and I can't even assume vandits scum from that either.
100% agreeIn post 284, Raskolnikov wrote:As was said vandits pushing based on inactivity is incredibly shallow and directed at what could look like the easier targets to him in the game. Interestingly he doesn't seem to mind f-oh-x or dvd inactivity though which if anything has been more apparent than beeboy being sick and f-oh-x replacing in at the day's end (although scumreading on activity is bs to begin with). I thought about it and the epicmafia thing could explain some of his crap earlier this game but it's also experience I assume would affect his style as scum too so it's whatever. Even with the stylistic out I don't buy him being innocent around that hammer and he hasn't shown any remorse there either. There's so much inexplicable views and thoughts vandit expresses here that I don't know how he can't see or notice any of it.
The problem is with ranger having been town I have trouble being sure on the partner here. F-oh-x could technically fit through lack of mention both ways, but I really like the yesterday catchup post from him, and then going from all that to a townread of zyf today I think is indicative of read progression; very rare from scum. I doubt its beeboy either so at this point I'm thinking it's actually dvds just from vandit not mentioning her and some process of elimination, despite the lack of info we have there.
That said the alternative (to vandit) is some form of sickofit which isn't impossible but ehhh. Sick's been fairly reserved but there's nothing clearly malicious in his actions like with vandit.
Fox kinda jumped in, beeboy is kinda shot, and dvds is getting prodded and unfortunately may end up replaced e.eIn post 287, Raskolnikov wrote:I'd vote vandit right now except for the l-1. A concern for someone heavily scumread is a potential self hammer (if he thinks he's 100% getting lynched today) and another day ending early would be disastrous here.
Ideally we wait for beeboy fox and dvds to get involved and post their views (or replace) before we decide anything today so we aren't playing in the dark.
I actually love this honesty/admittance from sickofit here.In post 253, Sickofit1138 wrote:I had no argument as to why he was town and he was obviously the scummiest one to me.In post 251, Vandit24 wrote:@Sick i do not know why didnt you even changed your vote on sad (before night 1) and just went on going (since start of day 1)without any debates or knowning anything and till the end.
yep.In post 289, Raskolnikov wrote:I actually love this honesty/admittance from sickofit here.In post 253, Sickofit1138 wrote:I had no argument as to why he was town and he was obviously the scummiest one to me.In post 251, Vandit24 wrote:@Sick i do not know why didnt you even changed your vote on sad (before night 1) and just went on going (since start of day 1)without any debates or knowning anything and till the end.
Self analysing partner association is really not a thing..In post 288, Zyf wrote:Fox kinda jumped in, beeboy is kinda shot, and dvds is getting prodded and unfortunately may end up replaced e.eIn post 287, Raskolnikov wrote:I'd vote vandit right now except for the l-1. A concern for someone heavily scumread is a potential self hammer (if he thinks he's 100% getting lynched today) and another day ending early would be disastrous here.
Ideally we wait for beeboy fox and dvds to get involved and post their views (or replace) before we decide anything today so we aren't playing in the dark.
Do you have any evidence or reasoning that points to the fact that you are not as a matter of fact distancing from vandit as his scumpartner?
The fact that you mention offsetting protective action seems like Too Much Information for me. You seem to suggest Doctor/Jailkeeper would be on Ranger and that Mafia Roleblocker tried to target them (what else could be the "offset"?).In post 292, beeboy wrote:I don't think Ranger was killed for only being the IC she was probably also killed for having correct reads.
There had to have been something there to offset the chance she was targeted by a protective action last night.
How did I imply this?In post 293, F-oh-ex wrote:Mafia Roleblocker tried to target them (what else could be the "offset"?).
Corrected for you: If Mafia has 1x RB there is 100% chance there is a protection role. And why would you mention Ranger being targetted by a protection action out of a blue?In post 294, beeboy wrote:If mafia has 2x goons there is a chance there is a doctor.
If mafia has 1x RB there is a chance there is a doctor.
I believe this info is very public.
Because that is always a risk the scum team needs to consider regardless of whether or not they have a roleblocker.In post 296, F-oh-ex wrote:Corrected for you: If Mafia has 1x RB there is 100% chance there is a protection role. And why would you mention Ranger being targetted by a protection action out of a blue?In post 294, beeboy wrote:If mafia has 2x goons there is a chance there is a doctor.
If mafia has 1x RB there is a chance there is a doctor.
I believe this info is very public.
You didn't really answer my question. This brought nothing to the table, except maybe some Information Instead of Analysis right now. And IIRC Ranger wasn't such a strong general townread. Hell, she wasn't even #1 popular townread.In post 297, beeboy wrote:Because that is always a risk the scum team needs to consider regardless of whether or not they have a roleblocker.In post 296, F-oh-ex wrote:Corrected for you: If Mafia has 1x RB there is 100% chance there is a protection role. And why would you mention Ranger being targetted by a protection action out of a blue?In post 294, beeboy wrote:If mafia has 2x goons there is a chance there is a doctor.
If mafia has 1x RB there is a chance there is a doctor.
I believe this info is very public.