I don't know that you're town. I was about to add " OR YOU'RE SCUM " to that, but I was considering the possibility that this turns out to be one of those Energizer bunny TvTs that happens a lot between us.
It's like you want me to wagon you.
implosion wrote:
Unvote
VOTE: boem
Are you going to... explain this? Was boem even on your radar prior to th-
HEARD HE BE SNITCHING, WELL LET ME FIND OUT HE POINTING FINGERS I BRING HIS HAND BACK PROMO VAN BLAM THAT WHOLE FUCKING FAM WHACKED, WIFEY DUCT TAPED SARAN WRAPPED AND AMTRAK'D
This is going to get really annoying if we have to deal with it all game. I don't know how many townies there are here, but can we afford to lose one if it helps the sanity of the rest of us?
If I was a mafia team with him I'd have replaced out by now, I can only imagine how annoying mafia chat must be
scumslip
I read shannon's post as "I want to policy lynch Zach." I don't agree with doing that, but I don't think it's a scumslip. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think that you're hearing "Zach's town, but can we kill him anyway," and I think it's, "I don't care if he's scum or town."
In my experience, scumslips are more overt than this.
Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2016 9:33 am
by Dunnstral
That's not a scum slip any way you slice it
Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2016 9:33 am
by Lapsa
In post 223, Titus wrote:
Wait, they actually bothered to interview a witness for DUI?
yeah, because my buddies were "smart" enough to give out false testimonies.
driver switched seats with passenger who took the blame.
(aiming to lower penalty which would hit driver much harder including potential loss of his job)
their bluff was far from convincing, shit was blatantly obvious so police interrogated us all.
as for me - got off the hook in a flash. told that i was sleeping in a car and woke up when guys already were talking to cops.
didn't even have to lie (police lady funnily called it so)
anyway - it was fun ride. some "good cop, bad cop" action. some appeal to authority stuff. shaming, scaring.
too bad penalty is pretty much inevitable - would have laughed my ass off like a madman
HEARD HE BE SNITCHING, WELL LET ME FIND OUT HE POINTING FINGERS I BRING HIS HAND BACK PROMO VAN BLAM THAT WHOLE FUCKING FAM WHACKED, WIFEY DUCT TAPED SARAN WRAPPED AND AMTRAK'D
This is going to get really annoying if we have to deal with it all game. I don't know how many townies there are here, but can we afford to lose one if it helps the sanity of the rest of us?
If I was a mafia team with him I'd have replaced out by now, I can only imagine how annoying mafia chat must be
scumslip
I read shannon's post as "I want to policy lynch Zach." I don't agree with doing that, but I don't think it's a scumslip. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think that you're hearing "Zach's town, but can we kill him anyway," and I think it's, "I don't care if he's scum or town."
In my experience, scumslips are more overt than this.
She says "I can only imagine how annoying mafia chat must be", which reinforces the belief that I am scum. It is not " I don't care if he's scum or town ". It would be without that sentence.
In post 67, Titus wrote:My vote on Wake is serious based on group dynamic.
I find this pretty scummy considering he hasn't even posted, so he has not contributed to the group dynamic.
Then vote me.
For someone who was thrilled about joining and recruited a few of us, why hasn't he posted? Why has there been so much defense of him (chainsaws, painting as a quicklynch)?
Who knows?
Probably because you are voting to lynch a person upon whom
you have zero information
.
That is the definition of
not scumhunting
.
Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2016 10:00 am
by PeregrineV
In post 99, Wake1 wrote:PeregrineV ———✶ Peregrine, what do you think of Agar's current posts?
So far, nothing. (as in does not indicate towards sum or town.)
In post 67, Titus wrote:My vote on Wake is serious based on group dynamic.
I find this pretty scummy considering he hasn't even posted, so he has not contributed to the group dynamic.
Then vote me.
For someone who was thrilled about joining and recruited a few of us, why hasn't he posted? Why has there been so much defense of him (chainsaws, painting as a quicklynch)?
Who knows?
Probably because you are voting to lynch a person upon whom
you have zero information
.
That is the definition of
not scumhunting
.
I mean it isn't zero information... the information that existed was that he had not yet posted. It might not be particularly good/strong information but it is information.
In post 248, Zachstralkita wrote:I have a scouter-type ability for finding scum (which people....don't really put faith in... but it works)
when i was 4 years old and got asked what i'm gonna be when i grow up, i said: 'SPACESHIP'
i believe i've succeeded
That's inspirational.
Hey, are you making fun of me?
Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2016 10:06 am
by Lapsa
In post 262, podoboq wrote:You have opinions. How about explaining them?
yes. of course. no problemo
Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2016 10:09 am
by implosion
I also need to figure out a way to sort Nos; in the game performer mentioned he was a scumread of mine who scum killed n1 and iirc part of it was lack of content. But I'm actually a little skeptical of both of those two right now. Performer is (at least not yet) giving me the same :townvibes: from that game. Though there was the NL vote which is still a bit town but not strongly. W/e I guess I probably shouldn't worry too much about him if he's town he'll make it apparent to me. But Nos is worrisome.
Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2016 10:11 am
by Lapsa
In post 270, Zachstralkita wrote:Need I remind you that you have literally no argument against me? Are you sure you're not on drugs? You've never shared with me
that would be awesome. dial it up once you figure it out
Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2016 10:25 am
by Almost50
In post 207, Performer wrote:...............I would think it'd be harder to win after you fake claim, then hard claim on day 1. I believe Aeronaut hosted a game this year where PRs outed themselves early on . Scum won that game.
I don't wish to distract or interrupt the game here, so here's the story of THAT game if you're interested:
Spoiler:
I was a BodyGuard, and we had 12 possible setups. I claimed something else to trick the scum into outing themselves by claiming that role didn't exist in that game (due to them knowing their own roles). Due to my own role I knew we only had 3 possible setups. Long story short, I did figure out the exact setup through my play, but the TOWN gave in to SCUM!Ranger rather than listen to me. It was hard to face both Ranger and Titus (albeit Titus was in a hydra) as scum, but my point stands: I tend to do "what appears to be illogical" moves at times, but I do have a very good logical reason behind them that is not (and should not be) apparent to everyone else.