Mafiascum.net

In post 274, Infinity 324 wrote:That's shallow slandaar...

Undecided town doesn't have to ask questions to be undecided. I don't think there was a question he could've asked to help him figure out the situation more.

That is a perfectly valid reason that Slander has in my book.

VOTE: Infinity 324

There are other reasons to Scum read you, but the reason I gave is what I am going with at this point in time.

You're welcome to disagree, I don't see how that makes me scum...

In post 272, Slandaar wrote:Yes I did go and do something else. What's the issue?

the issue is the one others brought up earlier;

In post 173, rb wrote:I forgot why I was scumreading IPS tbh.

VOTE: Sladaar for reading 7 pages and not having much to add.

In post 174, Manuel87 wrote:Savage is replaced and Slandaar, JJD, Draynth have no content so far so nothing to add to that. But i dont think pressuring one of them will help us.

In post 196, Iprobablysuck wrote:Null: Everybody else (who are either aren't posting or aren't posting anything of note)

(This quote wasn't directed just at you, but still also covers you.

In post 259, Infinity 324 wrote:I don't find slandaar doing nothing scummy, it's not very helpful though. Town does that stuff all the time :/

In post 259, Infinity 324 wrote:I don't find slandaar doing nothing scummy, it's not very helpful though. Town does that stuff all the time :/

In post 265, JarJarDrinks wrote:Yeah he hasn't posted enough to scumread him yet. But yeah he needs to show up and explain his reads.

Very interested to know why he townreads Manuel since I'm kinda leaning scum there.

Any my veiw on you has also been kinda consistent and only getting worse;

In post 258, Naomi-Tan wrote:Just putting this out there; I find Slandaar really scummy right now; they lurked until we put votes on them and came back with; more content on monday. then when they returned on monday they havn't really mentioned the rest of the game and just tried to shade me :I

In post 152, Naomi-Tan wrote:Slandaar Who? They havn't posted yet so.. yeah

VOTE: Slandaar I feel its a good idea for me to put some pressure on this no posts lurker at this stage as its getting on into day 1

Finally As far as I remember you didn't post till after you had a vote on you on post 169 where you gave nothing.

@LicketyQuickety So if you disagree, give an example of a question Rask could have asked. Cause I agree w/ Infinitys assessment.

So yeah my issue with you is you've contributed nothing you've been saying things like X is town or Vote Y but your giving no reasoning. and when you said you'd give it later you vanished for 4 and a half hours returned and still didn't explain shit. It seems to me that your just lurking and not even trying to scum hunt / play.

In post 278, JarJarDrinks wrote:@LicketyQuickety So if you disagree, give an example of a question Rask could have asked. Cause I agree w/ Infinitys assessment.

I would have asked strait up what the purpose of the reacting test was and what they got out of it. All I see is that a reaction test was made and no results were produced.

In post 273, Naomi-Tan wrote:

In post 272, Slandaar wrote:I do believe the answer is no which is what you're implying, but, it was a simple question to see what your answer was. You can play differently as town.

No thats what your implying and im calling you out for.

For? saying you are playing differently? You said you don't know if you are.

Specifically what are you calling me out for?

In post 274, Infinity 324 wrote:That's shallow slandaar...

Undecided town doesn't have to ask questions to be undecided. I don't think there was a question he could've asked to help him figure out the situation more.

You can be undecided but normally when someone is unsure/undecided about something they have questions.

Asking for a link to why rb would think you would call it out would have been something.

In post 277, Naomi-Tan wrote:Finally As far as I remember you didn't post till after you had a vote on you on post 169 where you gave nothing.

I can't always be on ms. Are you trying to find scum or the players who don't have as much time as you?

In post 280, LicketyQuickety wrote:I would have asked strait up what the purpose of the reacting test was

In post 280, LicketyQuickety wrote:and what they got out of it

In post 280, LicketyQuickety wrote:All I see is that a reaction test was made and no results were produced.

Misrep

VOTE: LicketyQuickety

My memory is failing me. Shit.

In post 26, rb wrote:You really are a god.

I can't vote Manuel he's the mafia Role Cop. Draynth is my other scumbuddy.

This was the post I was remembering, not the one after.

VOTE: LQ

Proved wrong but then doesn't try to re-evaluate

ACTIVITY

and have not posted in the last 48 hours, and are being prodded.

In post 285, Infinity 324 wrote:VOTE: LQ

Proved wrong but then doesn't try to re-evaluate

I was just about to unvote you bro. Hold your horses, Jesus.

UNVOTE:

So, unless Slander votes me, I will prolly be sheeping them since I have proven to be pretty incompetent this game.

In post 288, LicketyQuickety wrote:So, unless Slander votes me, I will prolly be sheeping them since I have proven to be pretty incompetent this game.

Why Slander?

LQ could be scum he has been a bit dopey/not really paying attention and agreeing with me is a good strategy but no-one 'misreps' like that without misremembering. It's more a question of if scumLQ/townLQ is more likely to do so.

In post 25, Infinity 324 wrote:

In post 23, rb wrote:Oh wait there's 3 scum. Forgot this is mini not micro.

Oh did you just try to fake townslip?

Why didn't you vote here?

I wanted to stay on the manuel wagon for pressure

In post 281, Slandaar wrote:

In post 273, Naomi-Tan wrote:

In post 272, Slandaar wrote:I do believe the answer is no which is what you're implying, but, it was a simple question to see what your answer was. You can play differently as town.

No thats what your implying and im calling you out for.

For? saying you are playing differently? You said you don't know if you are.

Specifically what are you calling me out for?

I'm calling you out for implying I was playing differently without backing it up or mentioning anything other than and I'm going to paraphrase how I interrupted it; 'I wonder if your playing any different than normal'

In post 281, Slandaar wrote:

In post 274, Infinity 324 wrote:That's shallow slandaar...

Undecided town doesn't have to ask questions to be undecided. I don't think there was a question he could've asked to help him figure out the situation more.

You can be undecided but normally when someone is unsure/undecided about something they have questions.

Asking for a link to why rb would think you would call it out would have been something.

In post 277, Naomi-Tan wrote:Finally As far as I remember you didn't post till after you had a vote on you on post 169 where you gave nothing.

I can't always be on ms. Are you trying to find scum or the players who don't have as much time as you?

No I'm calling you out for lurking and only posting when the spotlight was put on you and when not you just give nothing of substance at all. like if you can't post often at least comment about whats happening in the game not first post page 7 and only after a vote landed on you and literally say "I have nothing to add"

Ninja;

In post 290, Slandaar wrote:LQ could be scum he has been a bit dopey/not really paying attention and agreeing with me is a good strategy but no-one 'misreps' like that without misremembering. It's more a question of if scumLQ/townLQ is more likely to do so.

In post 25, Infinity 324 wrote:

In post 23, rb wrote:Oh wait there's 3 scum. Forgot this is mini not micro.

Oh did you just try to fake townslip?

Why didn't you vote here?

All aboard the wagon.

In post 289, JarJarDrinks wrote:

In post 288, LicketyQuickety wrote:So, unless Slander votes me, I will prolly be sheeping them since I have proven to be pretty incompetent this game.

Why Slander?

Cuz I played a game with Slander and know he's rock solid. IIRC he was one of the few that could read me that game. I was I think friendly neighbor that game and I was voted off day 1.

In post 290, Slandaar wrote:LQ could be scum he has been a bit dopey/not really paying attention and agreeing with me is a good strategy but no-one 'misreps' like that without misremembering. It's more a question of if scumLQ/townLQ is more likely to do so.

Its NAI, unfortunately.

In post 293, LicketyQuickety wrote:

In post 289, JarJarDrinks wrote:

In post 288, LicketyQuickety wrote:So, unless Slander votes me, I will prolly be sheeping them since I have proven to be pretty incompetent this game.

Why Slander?

Cuz I played a game with Slander and know he's rock solid. IIRC he was one of the few that could read me that game. I was I think friendly neighbor that game and I was voted off day 1.

Isn't he voting for Infinity for a reason that you now disagree with?

Actually I guess he's not voting for Infinity. But YOU voted for Infinity based on something Slander said that you've now learned is complete BS.

I think Lickety decided he should vote infinity and then came up w/ a shitty reason cause he didn't want to appear to sheep.

In post 284, LicketyQuickety wrote:

In post 26, rb wrote:You really are a god.

I can't vote Manuel he's the mafia Role Cop. Draynth is my other scumbuddy.

This was the post I was remembering, not the one after.

Like what is he even saying here?

In post 292, Naomi-Tan wrote: I'm calling you out for implying I was playing differently without backing it up

You seemed more confident in the others.

In post 292, Naomi-Tan wrote: No I'm calling you out for lurking and only posting when the spotlight was put on you and when not you just give nothing of substance at all. like if you can't post often at least comment about whats happening in the game not first post page 7 and only after a vote landed on you and literally say "I have nothing to add"

Not having time isn't lurking.

I posted when I posted what I wanted to post. Do you really think I post 'nothing to add' as scum but not as town