Posted: Sat Aug 27, 2016 11:22 am
I don't like when someone acts like "everything can be faked", how would the game work? Stay in the shadows and wait someone make a flaw?
In post 215, Transcend wrote:VOTE: IoIn post 182, Io wrote:Apparently I can't go to sleep after making 4 posts without being accused of being lazy and doing nothing.
VOTE: Io happy?In post 180, Creature wrote:The fact Io hasn't voted anyone isn't scummy.
I couldn't really care much less about RVS. I participate if someone actually looks overtly scummy, but most times I just don't care to do it.
This guy is hopping onto every wagon that gains tractionIn post 225, Transcend wrote:What.
Massive hasn't even posted and you scum read him?
Forget about you moving up in my books.
VOTE: Creature
In post 86, Transcend wrote:Kinda wanna lynch Naomi they're annoying
In post 88, Transcend wrote:Yeah i do not like gimmick accounts in these games
In post 110, Transcend wrote:they're prob town i agree, but their posting style annoys me. wouldn't mind a vig on them lol.
His first 10 posts are just him whining about how annoying Naomi is. He's not commenting on what's actually happening.In post 116, Transcend wrote:I don't like your gimmick and the way you post.
He says this and then doesn't push at all or ask xyzzy any questions.In post 124, Transcend wrote:In post 14, xyzzy wrote:Killthestory, of the players who haven't posted yet, which is the scummiest? thanksIn post 93, xyzzy wrote:can you confirm that you're being serious about this statement? BlackStar, what's your thoughts?
I don't like how Jordarrian responded to that wagon, but I'm definitely not putting someone at L-2 on page 4 because that would be irresponsibleposts like these don't sound genuineIn post 105, xyzzy wrote:care to offer anything else, pistachi0n?
And then there's a sudden town read on Naomi without any explanation. This stuff doesn't sit right with me and I think we should pressure Transcend
this post right here makes me very suspicious regarding Transcend's wagon habitsIn post 29, Killthestory wrote:VOTE: JordarrianIn post 26, Jordarrian wrote:Alright hello guys! This is technically my first game because both my newbie games I replaced out. Killthestory knows me on another forum which I prefer to play mafia from, but I think we only played 1 game with each other.
If you guys would like links to see my games from there then let me know
Yo Transcend wagon this w/ me
Well not to prove your point, but everything can be faked. The thing is that you really can't take everything at face value and say that every town slip must be from town and you can't be skeptical of every single thing posted. The point where the "everythign can be faked" comes in is when looking at a person as a whole through their ISO and interactions with others to reach a conclusion of "OK they are likely not to be faking this town slip because they've done this and that which x number of coincidences means it's more likely to not be scum faking a slip," or "OK they are likely to be faking this because of the way they approached it and this and that makes them look more consistently scummy even in smaller amounts so it probably is indeed scum faking it."In post 275, Creature wrote:I don't like when someone acts like "everything can be faked", how would the game work? Stay in the shadows and wait someone make a flaw?
This is also the view im coming from. I took so many posts and put them together not because one thing stood out but it was a slow slide of mounting things that piled up to make me think this way.In post 278, Io wrote:Well not to prove your point, but everything can be faked. The thing is that you really can't take everything at face value and say that every town slip must be from town and you can't be skeptical of every single thing posted. The point where the "everythign can be faked" comes in is when looking at a person as a whole through their ISO and interactions with others to reach a conclusion of "OK they are likely not to be faking this town slip because they've done this and that which x number of coincidences means it's more likely to not be scum faking a slip," or "OK they are likely to be faking this because of the way they approached it and this and that makes them look more consistently scummy even in smaller amounts so it probably is indeed scum faking it."In post 275, Creature wrote:I don't like when someone acts like "everything can be faked", how would the game work? Stay in the shadows and wait someone make a flaw?
I feel it was just RVS going onIn post 277, xyzzy wrote:this post right here makes me very suspicious regarding Transcend's wagon habitsIn post 29, Killthestory wrote:VOTE: JordarrianIn post 26, Jordarrian wrote:Alright hello guys! This is technically my first game because both my newbie games I replaced out. Killthestory knows me on another forum which I prefer to play mafia from, but I think we only played 1 game with each other.
If you guys would like links to see my games from there then let me know
Yo Transcend wagon this w/ me
i don't understand what is the point of this post...like what did you say that isn't textbook mafiascum wiki page material?In post 273, Io wrote:Theoretically, yes. Realistically, no.In post 270, Creature wrote:So how do you expect town to post? Like gods?
I mean it is a game so everyone should be playing towards their wincon and town usually sets the meta and mafia mimic the meta in theory.
But the problem with theory is that it doesn't apply in all cases as you have some people who play town differently than others and scum who play scum differently than others. When it comes to making posts someone's style of post is more often than not just going to be how they usually post no matter if they are scum or town, alignment comes into play when making reads and how they go about making accusations. Scum are at a disadvantage because they already know the players' alignments, outside of multiball, and that can show through when scum make reads as they have to pretend they don't already know a player is confirmed town.
the utter oblivious nature of it.In post 283, pistachi0n wrote:Wait, my post made you pause in shock?
This means it was NAI but just took me off balance like a swing I wasn't expecting, to use a fighting metaphor.In post 284, Naomi-Tan wrote:the utter oblivious nature of it.In post 283, pistachi0n wrote:Wait, my post made you pause in shock?
Well that is the point. Creature seamed completely confused that people would even consider doing that.In post 281, pistachi0n wrote:i don't understand what is the point of this post...like what did you say that isn't textbook mafiascum wiki page material?In post 273, Io wrote:Theoretically, yes. Realistically, no.In post 270, Creature wrote:So how do you expect town to post? Like gods?
I mean it is a game so everyone should be playing towards their wincon and town usually sets the meta and mafia mimic the meta in theory.
But the problem with theory is that it doesn't apply in all cases as you have some people who play town differently than others and scum who play scum differently than others. When it comes to making posts someone's style of post is more often than not just going to be how they usually post no matter if they are scum or town, alignment comes into play when making reads and how they go about making accusations. Scum are at a disadvantage because they already know the players' alignments, outside of multiball, and that can show through when scum make reads as they have to pretend they don't already know a player is confirmed town.
How?In post 286, Transcend wrote:Solid case
He was talking to me. And I'm pretty sure he was being sarcasticIn post 298, Creature wrote:How?In post 286, Transcend wrote:Solid case
I understand Naomi and Io are inexperienced and never played with me, but you are different.