Posted: Mon Oct 10, 2016 7:49 am
I will stop posting like you want. Good bye.
Not what I said. But if you do, please take care!In post 275, Yume wrote:I will stop posting like you want. Good bye.
we already gave you tons of chances and you didn't improve one bitIn post 267, Yume wrote:And how am I supposed to change my play if you won't even let me join? Here's an idea: you give me a chance for a month. If I don't show signs of improving by then, then you could continue doing this without me objecting.
then play in newbie queue on your main you can't get WOTCed, remember?In post 285, Yume wrote:Alts aren't allowed to play in newbie queue.
I'll even offer to play with you, if you like. The general newbie-friendly atmosphere of that queue means nobody will yell at you for making a mistake, and it's a great way to relearn the basics of the game for a fresh start.In post 286, Accountant wrote:then play in newbie queue on your main you can't get WOTCed, remember?In post 285, Yume wrote:Alts aren't allowed to play in newbie queue.
/inIn post 289, GuyInFreezer wrote:Until every newbies replace out and the game is now filled with grumpy oldies
BANANA SPLITIn post 289, GuyInFreezer wrote:Until every newbies replace out and the game is now filled with grumpy oldies
Last I heard, they could after meeting SE requirements.In post 285, Yume wrote:Alts aren't allowed to play in newbie queue.
Is this your idea of a joke? As soon as that game is done, I'll blow the notion that I ruin large games out of the water.In post 294, House wrote:By terrible players, I mean Yume.
By good games, I mean any outside of the newbie queue.
It's not a notion, it's demonstrable fact that you wreck games.In post 295, Yume wrote:Is this your idea of a joke? As soon as that game is done, I'll blow the notion that I ruin large games out of the water.In post 294, House wrote:By terrible players, I mean Yume.
By good games, I mean any outside of the newbie queue.
It's also demonstrable that I don't.In post 296, House wrote:It's not a notion, it's demonstrable fact that you wreck games.In post 295, Yume wrote:Is this your idea of a joke? As soon as that game is done, I'll blow the notion that I ruin large games out of the water.In post 294, House wrote:By terrible players, I mean Yume.
By good games, I mean any outside of the newbie queue.
In post 297, Yume wrote:It's also demonstrable that I don't.In post 296, House wrote:It's not a notion, it's demonstrable fact that you wreck games.In post 295, Yume wrote:Is this your idea of a joke? As soon as that game is done, I'll blow the notion that I ruin large games out of the water.In post 294, House wrote:By terrible players, I mean Yume.
By good games, I mean any outside of the newbie queue.
Your current rate of completion on games is about 20%.In post 297, Yume wrote:It's also demonstrable that I don't.