Posted: Mon Nov 13, 2017 6:22 pm
In post 200, Dunkerdoodles wrote:(5) Kokochi Oma: Lapsa, Lord Gurgi, northsidegal, mozamis, Impede L-2!
In post 200, Dunkerdoodles wrote:(5) Kokochi Oma: Lapsa, Lord Gurgi, northsidegal, mozamis, Impede L-2!
In post 66, Nero Cain wrote:My vote is semi-serious. I don't really have any strong reads yet. I mean I have all sort of gut reads but nothing I'd be willing to bet on yet.In post 65, Sunlit Diamond wrote:Nero, why'd you vote Impede? You quoted yourself which makes me think it was serious, and I'm wondering what you're basing it on?
I think sometimes scum make little cheerful friendlish posts like these.
I actually did not kinda like this. I really hate players that claim scum but I do believe that Oma was just "trying to start the game". Anyways, Impede sheeping my lols policy daykill and not really using any words kinda made me feel weird. Like did he think Oma was scummy? What?In post 25, Impede wrote:In post 12, Impede wrote:for effect
Kinda didn't like him getting all up in Oma's grill.In post 49, Impede wrote:Make up your mind. I wasn't the one who suggested a PL on you page 1.
I still don't know what you were hoping to achieve. I can't see any response to that, organic or fabricated, being AI... especially because anyone in their right mind already suspects that you only posted it to stir the pot, so any reactions you get are WIFOM.
Is this scum that knows Lord Gurgi is town? Also its like he's playing both sides from the middle and I can see scum making a post like that.In post 59, Impede wrote:Not to be devil's advocate, but tunneling is a valid town strategy too
Quoting my vote was just making fun of his quoting my policy daykill but I think my vote is kinda comfy and I'ma ride here for a bit until the next shiny object catches my attention.
In post 75, Nero Cain wrote:In post 41, Impede wrote:Did you neglect to read your first post? You basically baited everyone in this entire game. If anyone is sus, I'd be more inclined to think it's you.In post 39, Kokichi Oma wrote:Nero's vote didn't seem fabricated to me. And his was the second vote. Soooo~In post 37, northsidegal wrote:how does that make it opportunistic, or scummy? other people did the same thing or something similar, would you say the same thing about them?In post 36, Kokichi Oma wrote:Because he didn't even say anything about it, just voted.In post 49, Impede wrote:Make up your mind. I wasn't the one who suggested a PL on you page 1.In post 46, Kokichi Oma wrote:I just wanted to see who would have a weird reaction, and I think I found the person.
I still don't know what you were hoping to achieve. I can't see any response to that, organic or fabricated, being AI... especially because anyone in their right mind already suspects that you only posted it to stir the pot, so any reactions you get are WIFOM.So why bark at him for 3 posts if its WIFOM and you are leaning newbtown?In post 44, Impede wrote:Why would scum react to that post???In post 43, Kokichi Oma wrote: So baiting people to see their reactions is scummy? Got it.
"Oh ok, sounds good Kokichi. Thank you for the heads up!"
Who are they?In post 74, Impede wrote:when we could instead focus on more promising scumreads.
In post 78, Nero Cain wrote:I think this comes from scum alot. Attacking bad or poor play to make themselves look useful but it serves no purpose in scumhunting. I like my vote.In post 76, Impede wrote:It's not smart play and he was trying to defend his position against northsidegal's questioning.
In post 84, Nero Cain wrote:In post 78, Nero Cain wrote:look usefulof course you might argue that you were scumhunting but you were already said that you were leaning newbtown so...In post 78, Nero Cain wrote:serves no purpose in scumhunting
In post 85, Nero Cain wrote:and honestly? 41, 44 and 49 don't give me any scum hunting vibes. They just seem like you fussing at KO for "not smart play" but you've already admitted to that so....
Can you explain what the town motivation is here?
In post 217, Nero Cain wrote:attractive saleswoman: We're so glad you could join us on the mafiascum shopping channel. Today we have a very special guest for you, mafiascums very own Nero Cain!
Nero: Thank you for having me here today.
attractive saleswoman: I'm told that you have exciting news for us.
Nero: That's right! I'm here to offer you guys a one-time limited offer on a scum lynch. It is SOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO easy. All you have to do is type V-O-T-E I-M-P-E-D-E and bold it by using either the vote button or wrapping it in the BB code.
attractive saleswoman: And don't forget the colon after the word vote
Nero: It should look likevote: ImpedeThis is a great offer. Its low risk and high reward and it comes with some great benefits. Firstly you'll get the adrenaline rush of being right and I'll be extremely grateful. Not only that, we'll be down one scum and closer to a town win.
attractive saleswoman: So you get the adrenaline rush, your gratitude, and a scum down all for a vote on impede? I don't know about anyone else but that is agreatdeal.
Nero: I know right? You'd have to be acompletemoron to pass this deal up.
BUT WAIT THERE'S MORE!
be on of the next 4 voters and you get town cred.absolutely free
attractive saleswoman: Wait, hold on. Did you just make an already great deal even better? Nero, I have to ask, are you crazy.
Nero: When it comes to lynching scum perhaps.
In post 238, Nero Cain wrote:I never left.In post 237, Impede wrote:Nero, mind explaining why you're back on the Impede wagon?
In post 237, Impede wrote:Not a very towny way to get a wagon formed.
not really linking the limp-wristed pushback.
In post 241, Nero Cain wrote:the case on Impede is pretty much the same thing it was on page 4.In post 229, mozamis wrote:but what is the case on impede?
though I guess I will add that
In post 83, Impede wrote:I'm curious to hear how questioning anti-town play is scummy.seem like a contridiction.In post 96, Impede wrote:I definitely wasn't scumhunting with those posts
I'm also not really a big fan of the "It's not a contradiction 'cause I already pointed it out!" argument. The bolded seems kinda hollow. I felt like the vote was a bit opportunistic and the area of his vote (as is yours) seems like prime real estate for a scum vote.In post 192, Impede wrote:I have to agree that this is really a stretch. I saved you the time of pointing out the contradiction byIn post 186, Kokichi Oma wrote:How is it scummy? Read that contradiction within his whole post.pointing it out myself. I even qualified the entire thing by saying you could be annoyed town.
The very fact that you'd jump on this with a statement like "this one needs rope" is so incredibly scummy.
VOTE: Kokichi
KO at L-2(provided I'm not terrible at math)
You managed to use two buzzwords to completely dodge the point.Transcend wrote:Lining up lynchesIn post 267, Shinobi wrote:Transcend is confirmed mafia until further notice.
Let's all abandon these wagons now and go back to lynching ASP so we can lynch Transcend afterwards.
Pedit: lol?
:Lethinque:
Honestly it's not even your reasoning that I'm attacking - it's the fact that people just kind of sheeped you after you posted some nonsense sales pitch. I remember there being reasons for Impede but the wagon really only showed up after you posted...That. I'll take another look at your case but the way people hopped on with you looked downright ridiculous.Nero Cain wrote:but real talk Shinobi, it's not like my reasons for voting impede are reasonless. So why are you trying to strongarm a not impede lynch as opposed to debating my reasons?
my sales pitch was gold. TBH, it could have been better but I got tired writing it.In post 279, Shinobi wrote:some nonsense sales pitch.
I think it is. If he's saying "hey, I'm questioning this anti-town play" he's arguing that he's scumhunting. Then he caved in to pressure and was like "opps, I wasn't scumhunting, just barking at him."In post 283, Shinobi wrote:though I might disagree with the point you made about him questioning anti-town play and not scumhunting being a contradiction.
In post 246, A Simple Plan wrote:and I dislike the high and mighty "I hope you're ready to get scumread..." in 237. Classic Scumstrat.
so I'm prob wasting my words, right?In post 280, Transcend wrote:But this flips red
Tbh I'd appreciate it if you came up with some good analysis on the two of them.In post 294, Transcend wrote:but then again your perspective on tis game is probably a lot more broader than mine
you acknowledge that the lynch is going to be between impede/kokichiIn post 296, Shinobi wrote:Tbh I'd appreciate it if you came up with some good analysis on the two of them.In post 294, Transcend wrote:but then again your perspective on tis game is probably a lot more broader than mine
If you want, KO is the only other lynch for today that's probably going to happen.
I thought I listed ASP as a lynch candidate.In post 297, Transcend wrote:you acknowledge that the lynch is going to be between impede/kokichiIn post 296, Shinobi wrote:Tbh I'd appreciate it if you came up with some good analysis on the two of them.In post 294, Transcend wrote:but then again your perspective on tis game is probably a lot more broader than mine
If you want, KO is the only other lynch for today that's probably going to happen.
yet here you are still vanity voting
rofl