Posted: Wed Apr 25, 2018 4:46 pm
Getting a free town lunch day one.In post 274, Gorkington wrote:what exactly is the tactical advantage that you think i was going for?
Getting a free town lunch day one.In post 274, Gorkington wrote:what exactly is the tactical advantage that you think i was going for?
In post 179, Stop Getting Banned Again wrote:VOTE: Gorkington
He had mod send us a warning.
Trying to make a big deal over nothing. Classic scum move.
Real talk: instead of trying to make us play a certain way - which I can guarantee that some heads will probably do the exact opposite for trolling purposes - why don't you quit the LAMIST business and focus on scum hunting or town hunting?In post 276, Gorkington wrote:i also dont think asking that your hydra commits to having its heads answer questions directed at posts they specifically made is an unreasonable request/making a big deal out of nothing?
p-edit: you really think that either question is me trying to get you lynched?
Yeah, we know you're not annoyed, because your entire interaction chain with us has been fake.In post 282, Gorkington wrote:im also not really annoyed, so comparing me to cheeky is kind of not applicable
(:
weeeeeeeeeeeee
vote: porkens
If you were actually playing the game, we might. But we don't, because you aren't.In post 284, Gorkington wrote:ooo nice lamist thats a good one.
got any other nifty buzzwords for me?
Why?
Presumably something about the interaction made Gork ping town for him, or at least not-scum. I would also like to know what it was.
A true clue, a clue that you don't care about finding alignment, one would think.In post 291, Gorkington wrote:im voting porkens, does that give you a clue?
I think arrest of the players can tell this is town. If need be, I can Retrieve my data on why I hold this opinion.In post 7, Stop Getting Banned Again wrote:fuck yeah we claim doctor
Power to you, my friend. I believe you have no place in a penitentiary.In post 28, PenguinPower wrote:Yea, but...I'm policy lynching...uh....
I'd say your ping is possibly true, but it's a bit early to say for sure. Tentatively, I want to say you ring the right bells.In post 72, Jingle wrote:Mulch please be scum. Please.
I'd say you're nearly a townread. I sure hope you don't plead the 50th.In post 41, Almost50 wrote:I Korina doesn't behave I might seriously consider it.In post 13, Porkens wrote:Who's in to policy lynch the stupid megahydra?
VOTE: stopgettingbannedagain
For now I wanna say hello to VOTE: Ginngie cuz we didn't get to talk much in the "Worst Game Ever"
This is a pile of garbage I'm not sorting through right now.In post 40, Mulch wrote:I'm actually a paranoid cop btw
I take beef with this post, but I admit I might be a little heavy-hamded in my read there.In post 13, Porkens wrote:Who's in to policy lynch the stupid megahydra?
VOTE: stopgettingbannedagain
A little bit of a schaddy entrance.In post 18, schadd_ wrote:back of the napkin if you get two different checks on two different people it's 75% they're different alignments
VOTE: stop getting banned again
Though tons of fun, this gorram player is the king of scum.In post 17, Gorkington wrote:counterclaiming vigIn post 15, Stop Getting Banned Again wrote:we'll vig you porkens
vote: stop getting banned
why did you unvote me here?In post 259, Stop Getting Banned Again wrote:The part about Creature being a borderline trust tell, or how Townhunting is preferable to scumhunting, or how everyone is going to alignment check on us n1 and flip us d2? Because I agree with all of the above. The only thing making this play suboptimal is that it would, in fact, be best to lynch us D1 considering how some of the other heads are treating this as an excuse to completely disregard the rules, the warning I got for cussing notwithstandingIn post 258, Jingle wrote:tn, you read my theory post yet?(couldn't have reasonably expected that to be against the rules)
UNVOTE:
~tn5421
Wasn't sure who we were voting; had a reasonable belief that we were self voting.In post 295, Gorkington wrote:why did you unvote me here?In post 259, Stop Getting Banned Again wrote:The part about Creature being a borderline trust tell, or how Townhunting is preferable to scumhunting, or how everyone is going to alignment check on us n1 and flip us d2? Because I agree with all of the above. The only thing making this play suboptimal is that it would, in fact, be best to lynch us D1 considering how some of the other heads are treating this as an excuse to completely disregard the rules, the warning I got for cussing notwithstandingIn post 258, Jingle wrote:tn, you read my theory post yet?(couldn't have reasonably expected that to be against the rules)
UNVOTE:
~tn5421
UNVOTE: