Posted: Mon Aug 06, 2018 5:45 pm
In post 273, Poseidon wrote:
In post 273, Poseidon wrote:
I feel the same way about A50's case on me. BuJaber seems sufficiently paranoid to be likely town.In post 77, BuJaber wrote:I think A50 makes good points but it is the sort of policy case that can easily be pushed by scum.
I'm interested in following your read on him later as he's a decent scumspect, although I find it tricky to read him this game as this wouldn't be the first time A50 has tunneled someone over semantics as town.In post 86, BuJaber wrote:Unclear yet. I can't determine his intentions based on just this because like I said it is NAI. When he posts more and we get an idea what his motivation is we'll know if it's genuine or not.In post 79, Eragon wrote:So are you calling A50 mechanical? And is that the towny, scummy, or neither?? Just asking to see your pinion on A50
I feel like the openess to a read on Eragon is pretty townie from BuJaber here, disagree that fluff posting is a scum crime though. I also like how he probes others for their opinion in what looks like a way to get a read on the questionee.In post 89, BuJaber wrote:Agree on most posts but 54 feels kind townie. What are your thoughts on it?In post 85, Fromage wrote:A lot of Eragon's posts contain only fluff. (35, 60, 62) I don't like it. VOTE: Eragon
FOS: Inferno. I don't like how much time he spends defending himself and how little scumhunting he does.
Yuck Manatee looks like scum from the embedded quote alone. I'm liking egg for town even if he's wrong about my slot.In post 39, Egg wrote:Do you not have any scum reads yet? If not, why no vote on Inferno?In post 38, ManateeDude wrote:I was reffering to you making guesses on roles. Thats almost always proscum behavior, I'm not gonna push you for it tho.In post 33, Inferno390 wrote:Because I find it’s a good way to get out of RVS. Helps me judge interactions and gather info. It hasn’t failed me yet, and I doubt it will start now.
Egg is scum now btw.
VOTE: Egg
In post 54, Eragon wrote:>votes
>says "p.sure this is villa"
If you think someone is villa then why pressure them?
In post 89, BuJaber wrote:Agree on most posts but 54 feels kind townie. What are your thoughts on it?In post 85, Fromage wrote:A lot of Eragon's posts contain only fluff. (35, 60, 62) I don't like it. VOTE: Eragon
FOS: Inferno. I don't like how much time he spends defending himself and how little scumhunting he does.
In post 143, Fromage wrote:Eragon's wall feels townie btw. He sticks his head out and gives us something to discuss.
I'm gonna give BOTD to the first post as a pressure-vote, but then we continue onward to more flip-flopping. And then calling someone else inconsistent?In post 144, Fromage wrote:I don't like how Burger put Inferno at L-1 and is fine with quicklynching him. Yes, inferno's behaviour has been consistent but I doubt this is a scum tell. In 58 Burger says he wants to hear more from poseidon and me before he puts inferno at L-1. Poseidon posts hardly anything 76 and I post very little. Then he just puts inferno at L-1. In 58 he said he feels uneasy quicklynching. But I don't recognize any uneasiness in 130 .
I also don't like 97. It contains a lot of speculation and focuses on one single interaction between manatee and inferno. Imho it's WIFOM. In addition to that I don't understand why he looks at manatee's meta but not at inferno's 98. Other people mentioned the possibility of inferno being lynchbait. Burger just excludes this possibility. 114 I cannot follow his thought process.
To conclude, I think Burger might be scum due to his inconsistent behaviour.
VOTE: GameNBurger
Is your tier systemIn post 281, Wh4t wrote:After quickly skimming ISOs my reads are:
{BuJaber, Egg, Eragon, GameNBurger, Poseidon}
{A50}
{Manatee, Fromage}
GNB's long posts made me lazy so I haven't given transparency on that read or on poseidon, however I will do so on request at a later time if it helps you all to read me.
Would the majority still like me to claim?
That's fine, A50 can be very convincing and I'm not saying the reasons are complete rubbish however I cannot undo what my predecessor has done or speak on his behalf. I will say that before I replace into a game, that I skim the relevant ISO before replacing in as I'm a terrible scum player. Inferno's frustration and stubbornness read town to me and I was right so XDIn post 280, Poseidon wrote:That said, I'm still very sus of your slot @Wh4t due to Inferno's behavior.
I'll move my vote to VOTE: Fromage but I'd happily move to Manatee once Toranaga confirms he's scum.In post 270, LastManStanding wrote:
weeeeeeeeeeeeIn post 253, LastManStanding wrote:Inferno390 is being replaced.
Toranaga, ManateeDude's replacement, hasn't picked up his Role PM. He has (expired on 2018-08-08 05:00:00) to confirm his Role PM, or else the slot will be replaced by someone else in his stead.
you're the devilIn post 284, Wh4t wrote:I'll move my vote to VOTE: Fromage but I'd happily move to Manatee once Toranaga confirms he's scum.In post 270, LastManStanding wrote:
I made no reads and called the setup incredibly townsided to the point of it being almost broken
In post 144, Fromage wrote:I don't like how Burger put Inferno at L-1 and is fine with quicklynching him. Yes, inferno's behaviour has been consistent but I doubt this is a scum tell. In 58 Burger says he wants to hear more from poseidon and me before he puts inferno at L-1. Poseidon posts hardly anything 76 and I post very little. Then he just puts inferno at L-1. In 58 he said he feels uneasy quicklynching. But I don't recognize any uneasiness in 130 .
I also don't like 97. It contains a lot of speculation and focuses on one single interaction between manatee and inferno. Imho it's WIFOM. In addition to that I don't understand why he looks at manatee's meta but not at inferno's 98. Other people mentioned the possibility of inferno being lynchbait. Burger just excludes this possibility. 114 I cannot follow his thought process.
To conclude, I think Burger might be scum due to his inconsistent behaviour.
VOTE: GameNBurger
Don't you mean "we?"In post 290, Toranaga wrote:you get 2 PRs and possible guilties on mafia.
no, I mean "you"In post 294, Wh4t wrote:Don't you mean "we?"In post 290, Toranaga wrote:you get 2 PRs and possible guilties on mafia.
I believe you just scum slipped.
VOTE: Toranaga L-1.
A single post doesn't determine alignment. You'll notice he was pushed off his initial victim (Eragon) when his reasons were challenged, so sure he would try better with the next reasoning. A50 weakened my slot's position so the move onto me wasn't any less opportunistic than scumreading someone for fluff posting.In post 295, Toranaga wrote:in the context where you're actually inferno, that feels pretty bad
you have to realise that's town motivated posting, yes?
I didn't read anyone else's thoughts on that dudeIn post 298, Wh4t wrote:A single post doesn't determine alignment. You'll notice he was pushed off his initial victim (Eragon) when his reasons were challenged, so sure he would try better with the next reasoning. A50 weakened my slot's position so the move onto me wasn't any less opportunistic than scumreading someone for fluff posting.In post 295, Toranaga wrote:in the context where you're actually inferno, that feels pretty bad
you have to realise that's town motivated posting, yes?
What do you think of poseidons thoughts about him?