In post 259, Formerfish wrote:Kor, what is your read on Lam so far? I keep going back and forth on her.
On one hand I can see where she is coming from, because Ive made those bad pushes as new town and I get it. On the other hand I feel like she is being intentionally abrasive to try and get a rise out of me (this happens in a lot of my games for some reason...). Like I just feel as if there is a lot of shade being thrown in her posts without a lot of substance to back and of it up.
Sorry for late reply, was out at a local fur-meet all of yesterday.
Looking back through Lam's ISO, I don't really like the back-and-forth voting on Kald/Brae slot in #90, #108, and #118.
It just feels weird to me to have someone be like "Ok, this person isn't talking, let me vote them" to go to "ok they talked, let me unvote" to finally "they're the only lurker, let me vote them".
I liked #137, (the "what if kald is actively lurking" part), mainly because that's a good thought-process. I also understand that scum could fake that thought-process, however, that doesn't stop me from liking it.
#166 also feels weird to me with the "Oh this could be LAMIST". I don't really see that as
LAMIST, (which means Look At Me, I'm So Town). I can kinda see where the LAMIST angle could come from, but, that's not what I originally got.
I saw it as "I'm TRing Kor because his playstyle is similar to my town playstyle".
The very bottom part of #170 also feels weird to me. "If we have kald late-game, that only helps scum. Scum would defend kald, and if kald's town, you waste a lynch when it matters".
We wouldn't have Kald late-game is the problem. Kald would get hanged before that point of the game simply as policy. In this case as well, FF even said that he'd bus Kald, and play as SK instead. Hell, I'd do the same exact thing too.
#211 also feels wrong to me. The whole "we have a subbed player, but I'm gonna keep my vote on them to see if they do anything" doesn't really sit right with me. I'm personally not a fan of voting players who just subbed in, unless they are confirmed to be scum in the first place.
If it's getting close to EOD, and we don't have a better lynch, sure, I'd be fine with lynching the subbed player, however, this isn't the case.
Votes are an easy way for town to quickly see who is scum-reading who. Keeping a vote on a player who just subbed in doesn't really tell us a whole lot. You would re-vote them once they did something suspicious, not once they subbed in.
I also don't really like #260, the "Well if you're scum-reading me, I don't really care" part in particular.
I don't think town, especially newb!town would follow that sort of playstyle. I know when I first started out, if someone scum-read me, I was instantly trying to figure out why, and what I could do to change that. I never had a "well i don't care if I'm being scumread" attitude when I originally started.
I also don't really like the "oh well flavor delayed the hammer" posts. Flavor saying that he doesn't think Dojaj isn't the D1 lynch means very little. I could say the same thing and it'd carry the same weight. He's the IC, he's here to help instruct you guys on how to play, but that doesn't mean he's any more likely to be town or scum.
To answer your questions on if Lam is being abrasive or just newb!town, I feel like it could be a bit of both. Some of the things, I could see newb!town doing, however, some of the others I don't really see newb!town doing, (the "I don't care you're SRing me", mainly). I'm also currently scum-leaning Lam. There's a few points that I brought up that I'd be fine with dismissing as newb!town, however, there are others I can't really say the same for.
I'll post the rest of my catch-up in a bit.