Mafiascum.net

Why is NMSA at L-2 already?

In post 272, skitter30 wrote:i basically wanted to know if you thought this about branson's vote on me

I'm expecting a solid explanation when she catches up. There are a few reasons I can see for someone 1/3 of the way through the game thread to vote you, and the way she posted made me feel like I could expect thoughts from her upon catching up. I didn't feel like I could expect more out of NMSA after his post, his seemed to be an attempt to avoid discussion, hers might be an attempt to generate it.

In post 273, Brigitte wrote:Well this is going to be my last post of the night. might be gone until friday, I know you all will miss me
Got about a third of the game sorted? 3-4 players sorted. Maybe when I get back I will have the rest sorted.

Cheers!

Have a good week!

In post 274, skitter30 wrote:i do kinda want to know why she's scumreading me tho

Patience. I think most of us are as curious as you.

In post 273, Brigitte wrote:Well this is going to be my last post of the night. might be gone until friday, I know you all will miss me
Got about a third of the game sorted? 3-4 players sorted. Maybe when I get back I will have the rest sorted.

Cheers!

have a good week!

In post 275, Lady Angel wrote:Why is NMSA at L-2 already?

how do you read him?

In post 277, Enter wrote:Patience. I think most of us are as curious as you.

yeah i basically have something i want to ask her about her read on me but i want to know why she's reading me that way first

In post 275, Lady Angel wrote:Why is NMSA at L-2 already?

Why is that a surprise? What do you think of the wagon?

I am sorry, I'm going to have to wait until tomorrow to get more into this game.

This alt requires more thinking than my main does and I've been sleeping very badly lately, so I need to catch up on that before I try forming thoughts that may not even be coherent.

In post 282, Branson wrote: This alt requires more thinking than my main does

What do you mean? Why would that be?

In post 283, tris wrote:

In post 282, Branson wrote: This alt requires more thinking than my main does

What do you mean? Why would that be?

Ankamius is my "play by intuition" account.
Branson is my "play by logic" account.

Hi everyone. Just based on skimming the thread, NMSA’s posts are pinging me the most. Not voting yet, because I’m concerned about the speed of that wagon.

Also, can someone please explain the votes on Brigitte, Skitter? Thanks.

In post 285, Nimueh wrote:Hi everyone. Just based on skimming the thread, NMSA’s posts are pinging me the most. Not voting yet, because I’m concerned about the speed of that wagon.

This is just WIFOM.

Also, can someone please explain the votes on Brigitte, Skitter? Thanks.

Everyone else is waiting on explanations on those as well.

Not JUST WIFOM, I mean, but it wouldn't surprise me if we've got some hard bussers that don't trust a buddy in this one.

In post 286, Enter wrote:

In post 285, Nimueh wrote:Hi everyone. Just based on skimming the thread, NMSA’s posts are pinging me the most. Not voting yet, because I’m concerned about the speed of that wagon.

This is just WIFOM.

Also, can someone please explain the votes on Brigitte, Skitter? Thanks.

Everyone else is waiting on explanations on those as well.

You don’t think it’s relevant? I always get nervous when wagons form really fast without a hard guilty, don’t you? Like he could still be scum, I just prefer not to rush my vote.

Because both read pretty townie to me.

In post 288, Nimueh wrote:

In post 286, Enter wrote:

In post 285, Nimueh wrote:Hi everyone. Just based on skimming the thread, NMSA’s posts are pinging me the most. Not voting yet, because I’m concerned about the speed of that wagon.

This is just WIFOM.

Also, can someone please explain the votes on Brigitte, Skitter? Thanks.

Everyone else is waiting on explanations on those as well.

You don’t think it’s relevant? I always get nervous when wagons form really fast without a hard guilty, don’t you? Like he could still be scum, I just prefer not to rush my vote.

Because both read pretty townie to me.

Anyone else you wanna vote?

In post 287, Enter wrote:Not JUST WIFOM, I mean, but it wouldn't surprise me if we've got some hard bussers that don't trust a buddy in this one.

Fair, I’ve definitely seen that happen.

In post 289, tris wrote:

In post 288, Nimueh wrote:

In post 286, Enter wrote:

In post 285, Nimueh wrote:Hi everyone. Just based on skimming the thread, NMSA’s posts are pinging me the most. Not voting yet, because I’m concerned about the speed of that wagon.

This is just WIFOM.

Also, can someone please explain the votes on Brigitte, Skitter? Thanks.

Everyone else is waiting on explanations on those as well.

You don’t think it’s relevant? I always get nervous when wagons form really fast without a hard guilty, don’t you? Like he could still be scum, I just prefer not to rush my vote.

Because both read pretty townie to me.

Anyone else you wanna vote?

No, because NMSA is currently the slot that’s pinging me the most, so if there aren’t any slots I find scummier, that’s probably where my vote’s going to go. Which is why I’m not voting yet.

[quote="In [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.p ... #p10759465]post 269[/url], xRECKONERx"]empty reads are worthless[/quote]
Idk they're suggesting your anger is fake

Anyway skitter and brigette are gut town

Reck/Enter I'm not 100% sure what to make of. Reck's gripe that Enter's reads were inconsistent on page 2 is just as contrived as Enter defending himself

NMSA's vote on urap is awful. OMGUS isn't AI in and of itself, but not being able to explain a scum read you OMGUS is. Scumreading his wagon without getting into specifics is an idle threat. Playstyle excuse doesn't justify a lack of reads and a lack of advancing the game. And I don't get the Brigitte vote at all. Looks like we bagged a newbscum here.

In post 287, Enter wrote:Not JUST WIFOM, I mean, but it wouldn't surprise me if we've got some hard bussers that don't trust a buddy in this one.

I have no clue how you're reading that as a bus. I'm keeping them off L1 to keep the day from ending early

In post 250, northsidegal wrote:NotMySpamAccount (5): u r a person 2 5, tris 62, tictac 67, Brigitte 144, Enter 207

I'm town reading everyone on this wagon to some extent except enter.

I'm a little surprised that no one has been willing to bring this to l-1. I see both town and scum motivations for voicing support for the wagon without getting on. I would not be surprised in the slightest if there is scum in that group.

I can get a better grip on the game when I'm actually posting.

Who else are you scum reading?

I have no other scum reads to share atm.

-

-