i'm not trying to make you feel bad, RC. my saying that i'm not townreading you isn't some permanent thing – it's a reflection if my current read. it's not as if i don't intend to try to read you. it's not as if i don't
want
to townread you.
Posted: Wed Mar 20, 2019 10:18 am
by northsidegal
i would much rather you stay in this game regardless of your alignment and play it with me, especially if you're town.
Posted: Wed Mar 20, 2019 10:19 am
by RadiantCowbells
i'm not replacing out.
Posted: Wed Mar 20, 2019 10:19 am
by insomnia
that's not what i'm saying. i'm saying that it seems to me like the logic you're using with regards to yourself would apply elsewhere, and yet you're not applying it elsewhere – and that's what i'm somewhat confused on.
I'm not applying it elsewhere because the specific scenario that we're talking about didn't happen to other people except for you and RC. DrDo voted for himself, you voted for RC and Rui voted for you, and given my theory on how I want to keep you both alive for good reasons to town, I don't think I should've applied it to you two.
Posted: Wed Mar 20, 2019 10:21 am
by insomnia
i'm not townreading RC and my death would not confirm him as town.
Then why is your vote on him?
Posted: Wed Mar 20, 2019 10:22 am
by RadiantCowbells
like i'm happy that you're here. don't get me wrong. but your replace in completely destroyed my ability to play this game how i would have wanted to play it.
regardless of what you say I don't think that if I somehow survived night one you would ever be okay with me being access pointed when there's easier people to read around.
this game is making me feel really bitter about a situation where i'm expecting you to win this for us anyway, so i think it's better for me to just check out.
Posted: Wed Mar 20, 2019 10:24 am
by RadiantCowbells
I get it. i'm not unhappy with you, just the game.
Posted: Wed Mar 20, 2019 10:25 am
by RadiantCowbells
i'll be
really
unhappy with you if you lose though. don't do that.
Posted: Wed Mar 20, 2019 10:29 am
by RadiantCowbells
if you replace out in response to that i'll replace out too btw. don't do that. just play the game.
In post 237, RadiantCowbells wrote:the short answer is that i don't like the idea of you getting access pointed, me getting nightkilled, and then the remaining town being left to their own devices to determine who to send.
Isn't the point of the strat you laid out at the very beginning so that we'd know we were sending the survivor of our pool of three D2? That would leave only one more successful send left and statistically alone we're more likely to send town than scum D3.
In post 250, insomnia wrote:I have. My point was that I get sent today. On day 2 a vig shoots roster because he was the one who supported my vote without stating a reason and when he flips town, that clears me as town (or roster had bad reads and I'm scum, but, let's be honest). After vig shoots, they are confirmed 100% so they get sent day 2 and on day 3 it really doesn't matter who's sent because if we get to LyLo, we just lynch the last person. That was my plan.
If I'm pinging scum to you, vig can just shoot me since I suck anyways and that confirms roster as town so you can send him while keeping both you and NSG alive. One of you gets nked but we still have at least 1 experienced town.
This whole idea only works if we assume you and roster are the same alignment one way or the other. Roster has barely interacted with you, he townreads you and told you vigs couldn't go on the mission thats it. Pretty flimsy basis to make the assumption you're making
Posted: Wed Mar 20, 2019 11:28 am
by insomnia
Would a town vote someone that they feel is scum, especially in this setup? Question to Locke.
Posted: Wed Mar 20, 2019 12:19 pm
by FakeGod
Posted: Wed Mar 20, 2019 12:21 pm
by Locke113
No, though since I'm sure this is where you're heading, not only does being town not automatically make someone's reads be right so they could be voting scum anyway, scum in this setup are not incapable of voting town, especially at a time when that person has few votes on them.
RC why do you have such a high level of confidence that you are always right? Self doubt is natural, and helpful for others to read you. I just find you a bit jarring, but I'm 90% sure it's how you play.
Posted: Wed Mar 20, 2019 12:38 pm
by rosterfoster
Also me flipping town does not confirm insomnia. I can be wrong.
Posted: Wed Mar 20, 2019 12:39 pm
by rosterfoster
Like Insomnia is town, but townread him because he's town, not because I'm town.
You guys realize votes are to access point, not lynch?
RC are you joking or are you sure she's scum?
Yes I know, I'm saying I'd be comfortable with NSG being put up for access point
In post 217, DrDolittle wrote:I'm null against insomnia. He calls rc and me town, but votes nsg instead. But hes pretty clueless with 210 looks town
Same here, I think they're more likely to be town
Posted: Wed Mar 20, 2019 1:17 pm
by RuiRui
I think what town needs to be doing right now is getting the vig opinions on NSG/Insomnia and likely pushing one of them through to access point, I think talking about other reads hurts town by giving scum a guideline on who to kill
, what do you think of the setup? any reads so far?
It's pretty fun. It reminds me of Revolution.
I haven't seen anybody that I think is scum though. Anything that I think is scummy has been shown to be a mistake about the setup they didn't get. Right now I trust RC.
Posted: Wed Mar 20, 2019 1:36 pm
by RadiantCowbells
do you have any reads besides on me?
Posted: Wed Mar 20, 2019 1:50 pm
by RadiantCowbells
like you literally have not said anything about anyone who isn't me. I don't want to scumread you for correctly townreading you but you have to do more than have a read on me??
what are your thoughts on NSG, DDL, insomnia, whoever?
Posted: Wed Mar 20, 2019 1:54 pm
by RadiantCowbells
I take back my withdrawn townread on insomnia ftr.